In search of a governance framework for responsible research and innovation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Responsible Research and Innovation as a governance paradigm: what is new?
This chapter frames RRI as an emerging governance approach in the EU regulatory context. We argue that reference to fundamental rights makes RRI a distinctive approach to responsibility compared to other existing paradigms and that human rights, in particular those laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, are not necessarily a constraint but can instead be a catalyst of innovation. Eventually we maintain that a governance framework based on the complementarity between legal norms and voluntary commitments might successfully combine the respect of fundamental rights with the openness and flexibility of the innovation process. Published in: Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation. Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project, Karlsruhe 2016. Editors: Ralf Lindner, Stefan Kuhlmann, Sally Randles, Bjørn Bedsted, Guido Gorgoni, Erich Griessler, Allison Loconto, Niels Mejlgaard
Institutional Governance of Responsible Research and Innovation
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2023
In this chapter, we analyse the debate around the implementation of responsible research and innovation (RRI) in Higher Education, Funding and Research Centres (HEFRCs). We will illustrate some proposals about how to implement RRI in HERFCs in a good way. Open and inclusive governance is key to fruitful implementation of RRI in these organizations. Governance in this context refers to ways of steering processes in a desirable direction, in this case in the direction of responsible research and innovation that is ethically acceptable and socially desirable. We will present and assess different models of governance and aim to provide ethical governance of research and innovation (R&I) inspired by the most convincing ideas emerged in the current debate.
RECERCA. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi
Responsible research and innovation (rri) imposes normative requirements on research and innovation processes resembling three successive steps, each more ambitious than its predecessor, with distinct features. For the research dimension the distinct features reflect the normative requirements of, first, credible research (through, for example, codes of conduct and standards for scientific integrity); second, responsive research (by opening up science to societal demands); and third, responsible research (which includes the anticipation of socially desirable outcomes). Equally distinct features reflect the requirements of credible innovation, responsive innovation, and responsible innovation (Von Schomberg, 2019).
Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation
This book is the result of the Resagora Project (Responsible Research and Innovation in a Distributed Anticipatory Governance Frame. A Constructive Socio-normative Approach) aiming at developing a normative and comprehensive governance framework for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). List of authors (in alphabetical order): Simone Arnaldi, Bjørn Bedsted, Nina Bryndum, Stephanie Daimer, Davy van Doren, Jakob Edler, Cheng Fan, Adolf Filacek, Sally Gee, Guido Gorgoni, Clair Gough, Erich Griessler, Pierre-Benoît Joly, Stefan Kuhlmann, Alexander Lang, Philippe Laredo, Ralf Lindner, Allison Loconto, Saulė Mačiukaitė-Žvinienė, Christoph Mandl, Niels Mejlgaard, Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros, Elena Paiotti, Sally Randles, Gema Revuelta, Sarah Seus, Élise Tancoigne, Loreta Tauginienė, Morten Velsing Nielsen, and Bart Walhout
2016
Introduction 9 1 Introduction 21 Part 2 Approaching RRI Governance 23 2 RRI as a governance paradigm: What is new? 31 3 Framings and frameworks: six grand narratives of de facto rri 39 4 Evolution of a concept: a scientometric analysis of RRI 47 5 Res-AGorA concepts and approach 55 6 The Res-AGorA Co-construction Method 63 Part 3 Empirical programme 65 7 Res-AGorA case studies: drawing transversal lessons 77 Case Study 1 Fracking 85 Case Study 2 Danish priority-setting for strategic research 93 Case Study 3 NanoNextNL 101 Case Study 4 Critical organisations 109 Case Study 5 Synthetic biology 115 8 Monitoring RRI in Europe: approach and key observations 121 9 RRI at European universities 127 10 RRI in European member states: the case of Germany 133 Part 4 Governing towards responsibilisation 135 11 Responsibility Navigator 161 12 Conclusion: making responsibility an institutionalised ambition 169 References 181 Authors 184 The Res-AGorA project consortium 185 Acknowledgement 186 Imprint 4 N a v i g a t i n g t o w a r d s s h a r e d r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i n r e s e a r c h a n d i n n o v a t i o n P r e f a c e 5
In European science and technology policy, various styles have been developed and institutionalised to govern the ethical challenges of science and technology innovations. In this paper, we give an account of the most dominant styles of the past 30 years, particularly in Europe, seeking to show their specific merits and problems. We focus on three styles of governance: a technocratic style, an applied ethics style, and a public participation style. We discuss their merits and deficits, and use this analysis to assess the potential of the recently established governance approach of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’ (RRI). Based on this analysis, we reflect on the current shaping of RRI in terms of ‘doing governance’. Keywords: Policy; Governance of S&T; Technocracy; Public participation; Ethics expertise; ELSA/ELSI; RRI; New and emerging science & technology
Relations
In last years, the European Commission has promoted an approach that seeks to anticipate and assess potential implications and societal expectations with regard to research and innovation, with the aim to foster the "design of inclusive and sustainable research and innovation". The approach, called Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), has become a crosscutting theme of Horizon 2020, the most important European research funding system. RRI has its roots in a longstanding debate on the sense of techno-scientific innovation and its power to produce both benefits and harm, producing risks, arising ethical dilemmas and controversial questions. It proposes a framework for governing the innovation process asking all actors to become mutually responsible and responsive in order to reach "socially desirable" and "acceptable" innovation goals. Years after its emergence as a policy concept, studies and reports have evaluated the efforts to mainstream RRI in the national policies, revealing that questions still remain open to discussion. In this paper we will give a brief overview of RRI approach, what it is, why and how it emerged and developed within the policy discourse in the European context. We will then review some key lessons concerning opportunities and challenges embedded in this approach, focusing on the role of science.
4. Choosing freedom: ethical governance for responsible research and innovation
2019
Is responsible innovation a paradox given their apparently clashing objectives? Is innovation an act of freedom? Has freedom only meaning? What kind of freedom is then suitable for responsible research and innovation? And what kind of responsibility, given that there can't be any responsibility without a corresponding freedom? This analysis will help us in understanding what kind of governance can be named as ethical and provide an appropriate support to implement RRI.