Institutions as battleground. Democratic implications of initial institution building in post-communist regimes (original) (raw)
Related papers
Institutional Choice in New Democracies
Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2001
Institutions shape political outcomes, yet institutions themselves are endogenously shaped outcomes of political choices. Such choices are especially significant during transitions to democracy, when initial institutional designs fundamentally structure the path of democratic development. Most theories of institutional emergence, however, focus on stable contexts rather than on the conditions of acute uncertainty identified in the standard transitions literature. Our article attempts to bridge the two subfields by outlining and applying a model of institutional choice as the outcome of a struggle between fledgling opposition parties and the authoritarian regime wherein each side struggles to gain the greatest distributive payoff. We examine the creation of the Hungarian electoral system of 1989, linking the positions of the participants to the institutional alternatives which they expected to maximize their expected seat shares in the election to take place under those rules. The ev...
Introduction: On the Politics, Concepts and Histories of European Democratization
Ashgate Research Companion to the Politics of Democratization in Europe: Concepts and Histories, 1-14, 2008
Democratization' is a frequently encountered concept in academic book titles, often used under the assumption that Western democracies should be the normative reference regarding democratization elsewhere. Yet only a handful of studies deal with the initial breakthrough of democratization in europe more than two hundred years ago, or with the fairly recent changes in democratic ideals and practices due to social movements and gender issues. This research companion presents a complementary view that questions the validity of the ready-made model of Western democracy. it studies the details of political struggles that have led to the present-day situation within the processes of democratization in europe. reading history this way highlights neglected features of democratization, such as rhetorical manoeuvres by political agents, conceptual changes, gender struggles and time conditions for political action -all of which are aspects that reveal the history of democratization to be much more contingent than it is usually taken to be.
2010
Institutional democratization has made considerable progress in the history of the European Union. Mainstream theories of democratization, however, fail to capture this process because they are wedded to the nation-state context. This paper therefore proposes a transformationalist theory of democratization beyond the state. EU democratization results from conflict about the redistribution of political competences between institutional actors in a multi-level system, in which liberal democracy is the shared norm of legitimate authority. To the extent that institutional actors, who push for further integration in order to increase efficiency, undermine existing democratic institutions at the national level, their competitors can put into question the legitimacy of integration by invoking the shared liberal democratic community norms and shame them into making democratic concessions. The normative origins of democracy in the EU are illustrated in case studies on democratic membership conditionality, legislative rights of the European Parliament, and the institutionalization of human rights in the EU.
Introduction: From democracy decline to democracy renewal
Declining Democracy in East-Central Europe, 2019
The dramatic decline of democracy in East-Central Europe (ECE) has attracted great interest worldwide, both in the circle of leading politicians and among social scientists. Going beyond the usual narrow spectrum of the extensive literature on this topic, this book offers a comprehensive analysis of the ECE region, covering the three big social subsystemsthe socioeconomic , legal-political and cultural-civilizational dimensions-in their interactions to explain the reasons for the collapse of ECE democratic systems in the 2010s. The book does not deal with the individual ECE countries-the Czech Republic (CZ), Hungary (HU), Poland (PL), Slovakia (SK) and Slovenia (SI)-separately, but outlines the general features and the historical trajectory of the ECE region in last 30 years, from the very beginning of systemic change in 1989 until the end of 2018, in the two big stages of 'chaotic democracy' and 'authoritarian populism', with a turning point around 2010. Finally, starting from the decline in democracy, the book indicates the perspectives for democracy renewal in ECE in the period of the New World Order and the continued federalization of the EU. This Introduction gives the theoretical summary of the whole book, the 'bare bones' or description of its conceptual framework and basic terms in outline, focusing on Europeanization and democratization in ECE. It turns against the 'Western fallacy' as an easy dream of creating a carbon copy of the West through a relatively short and painless evolutionary catching-up process. My earlier books (Ágh, 1998a, 1998b) were written in a rather optimistic mood about the enormous historical progressive transformations in ECE in the years of democratic transition when the focus was on the big legal-constitutional transformations. No doubt the Great Transformation-using the term of Karl Polanyi ([1944] 2001)-in ECE has meant a progressive historical turning point for Euro-Atlantic integration, as has been discussed in a literature of library size. But this
Democracy and Institutional Political Subjectness: Comparative Study for Europe and Central Asia
Przegląd Politologiczny
This article presents the results of a comparative analysis of political institutions in different types of regimes through indicators of their political subjectness, namely governance effectiveness, government’s future orientation and institutional trust. The correlation between these indicators and the level of democratisation for 50 countries in Europe and Central Asia as of 2021 and in the dynamics of the last 15 years is calculated on the basis of a broad empirical database. The influence of new world order trends, such as the development of a network society, the digitalisation of the political field and the influence of international financial institutions, on institutional political subjectness is explored. The author concludes that consolidated democracies and autocracies have a higher level of political subjectness than hybrid regimes. Democracies are more effective in governance, but autocracies are more perceived by their citizens as capable of providing political stabil...
2010
The paper lays the theoretical and methodological foundations of a new historically-minded approach to the comparative study of democratization, centered on the analysis of the creation, development and interaction of democratic institutions. Historically, democracy did not emerge as a singular coherent whole but rather as a set of different institutions, which resulted from conflicts across multiple lines of social and political cleavage that took place at different moments in time. The theoretical advantage of this approach is illustrated by highlighting the range of new variables that come into focus in explaining democracy's emergence. Rather than class being the single variable that explains how and why democracy came about, we can see how religious conflict, ethnic cleavages, and the diffusion of ideas played a much greater role in Europe's democratization than has typically been appreciated. Above all, we argue that political parties were decisive players in how and why democracy emerged in Europe and should be at the center of future analyses.
Institutional Design and Democracy in Post-Communist Countries
Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 2005
In this paper, I present a theory about the institutional determinants of democracy, arguing that the party system format is a central determinant of democracy. In turn, institutional engineering largely shapes the party system. Parliamentary systems and party list proportional representation are more conducive to a strong party system with competitive, programmatic and institutionalized political parties, and consequently to democracy. To show this, I look at a subset of post-Communist polities, those with a majority Orthodox population, thus controlling for the effect of religion. When we look at the relationship between economic development (another important explanatory variable) and democracy, we see that in this group the relationship is actually negative. I offer an institutional explanation for this paradox: less economically developed Orthodox countries have made better institutional choices than more economically developed Orthodox countries.