Privatization and Regulation: A Review of Airport Industry Practices (original) (raw)
While airports were seen as purely public establishments for many years, today approaches to airport governance have been changing in many countries and private participation has become a part of many governments’ agenda. This study aims to examine methods, incentives and outcomes of private participation in airport management and operations and different regulation applications in different countries. Findings show that there are many similarities between countries both in incentives and outcomes of airport privatization. On the other hand, some country-specific reasons and results need to be examined in their contexts.
Related papers
Privatizing airports - options and case studies
1996
Traditionally, the air transport sector--airlines, airports, and air navigation services--has been in state hands. The private sector became involved in the sector only recently, beginning with the airlines. Privatization of airport infrastructure and private sector participation in air navigation are also at an early stage. The air transport sector will require large capital investments over the next fifteen years to modernize aircraft fleets, improve airport infrastructure, introduce more sophisticated air navigation systems, and meet the demand of new markets. There is no doubt that governments will be unable to fund all necessary investments, and that the private sector will therefore play an increasing role in meeting the sector's needs. Table 1 in this Note presents three options of private sector participation in airports. Table 2 presents two options most suitable for transferring airport activities to the private sector. The Note also outlines cases of airport privatiza...
Airport governance reform: a strategic management perspective
Reform of airport governance structures through corporatization, privatization and other approaches to commercialization is intended to attain a number benefits for air transport system stakeholders. While reformers often want managers to bring a commercial and strategic orientation to the operation of an airport they often create regulatory and governance structures that inhibit such an approach. This paper shows how different modes of governance tend to create trade-offs between stakeholder outcomes. It is suggested that different governance modes embody constraints and incentives that determines the type and quantity of managerial and financial resources that private sector agents will bring to the operation of airports. Additionally, the effectiveness of particular governance modes depends upon national institutional context.
This paper focuses on measuring and comparing productive efficiency and profitability among airports owned and operated by government departments, 100% government-owned corporations, independent airport authorities, mixed enterprises with government majority ownership and mixed enterprises with private majority ownership. The analysis is based on a cross-sectional, time-series dataset (2001–2003) for the major Asia-Pacific, European and North American airports. There is strong evidence that airports with government majority ownership and those owned by multi-level of government are significantly less efficient than airports with a private majority ownership; there is no statistically significant evidence to suggest that airports owned and operated by US government branches, independent airport authorities in North America, or airports elsewhere operated by 100% government corporations have lower operating efficiency than airports with a private majority ownership; airports with a private majority ownership achieve significantly higher operating profit margins than other airports; whereas airports with government majority ownership or multi-level government ownership have the lowest operating profit margin; and generally, airports with a private majority ownership derive a much higher proportion of their total revenue from non-aviation services than any other category of airports while offering significantly lower aeronautical charges than airports in other ownership categories excluding US airports. The results suggest that private–public–partner- ship with minority private sector participation and multi-level governments’ ownership should be avoided, supporting the majority private sector ownership and operation of airports.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.