Linking Instruction and Assessment in Science: Science Learning Opportunities and Student Performance on a Set of Open-Ended Science Questions (original) (raw)

Fifth graders' science inquiry abilities: A comparative study of students in hands-on and textbook curricula

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2006

A large number of American elementary school students are now studying science using the hands-on inquiry curricula developed in the 1990s: Insights; Full Option Science System (FOSS); and Science and Technology for Children (STC). A goal of these programs, echoed in the National Science Education Standards, is that children should gain ''abilities to do scientific inquiry'' and ''understanding about scientific inquiry.'' We have studied the degree to which students can do inquiries by using four hands-on performance assessments, which required one or three class periods. To be fair, the assessments avoided content that is studied in depth in the hands-on programs. For a sample of about 1000 fifth grade students, we compared the performance of students in hands-on curricula with an equal number of students with textbook curricula. The students were from 41 classrooms in nine school districts. The results show little or no curricular effect. There was a strong dependence on students' cognitive ability, as measured with a standard multiple-choice instrument. There was no significant difference between boys and girls. Also, there was no difference on a multiple-choice test, which used items released from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). It is not completely clear whether the lack of difference on the performance assessments was a consequence of the assessments, the curricula, and/or the teaching. ß

Effects of Formative Assessment Probes Integrated In Extra-Curricular Hands-On Science: Middle School Students' Understanding

This study had three main purposes, to (a) determine students' understanding of basic physics concepts, (b) analyze the science concepts and their connection to real-life context in science curricula and teaching materials, (c) evaluate effect of formative assessment probes on students' understanding of selected key concepts. Subjects were 197, 8th grade students who had studied five basic physics concepts. To evaluate students' understanding, a questionnaire consisting of formative assessment probes was administered with 4 multiple choice and 4 open-ended questions. Findings indicated that students had poor conceptual understanding of the concepts. Science curriculum, analyzed in terms of application to real-world contexts, indicated that textbooks included few practical explanations. In an intervention, one public school received formative assessment probes integrated with extra-curricular hands-on science instruction. Pre-post data showed significant increases in students' understanding of basic physics concepts. Finding that these students significantly out-performed other groups implies: (a) the need to include students' prior learning in instruction and (b) the need for more learning time to apply understanding of concepts to real-world contexts.

Development and Validation of a Science Inquiry Skills Assessment

Journal of Geoscience Education, 2015

This paper reports on the development and validation of a science inquiry skills assessment for Earth science (iSA-Earth Science) in middle schools that classroom teachers can use to assess and monitor their students' science inquiry skills. An assessment framework with six primary inquiry skills, each with three to six subskills, was developed based on a comprehensive review of the literature and following the recommendations of the National Science Education Standards (NSES; NRC, 1996) and A Framework for K-12 Science Education (FSE; NRC, 2012). The six primary skills are: (1) identify questions for scientific investigations, (2) design scientific investigations, (3) use tools and techniques to gather data, (4) analyze and describe data, (5) explain results and draw conclusions, and (6) recognize alternative explanations and predictions. The assessment development and validation process followed guidelines from the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Educational Research Association [AERA], American Psychological Association [APA], and National Council of Measurement in Education [NCME], 1999). Psychometric analysis using both classical test statistics and Item Response Theory showed the instrument was internally consistent, reliable, and did not function differentially for male and female students. Implications for science education practice and research are discussed.

Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms

Educational Assessment, 1997

The improvement of science education in accord with the current science reform agenda requires the development of sophisticated instructional strategies that are grounded in a clear recognition of student understanding. We describe a pedagogical strategy, the assessment conversation, that helps teachers elicit student understanding and then use elicited and diverse student understanding as the instructional basis for achieving conceptual and reasoning goals in the classroom. We then illustrate the potential and challenges of using the assessment conversation through examples that have emerged from Science Education through Portfolio Instruction and Assessment (SEPIA), a project attempting to reform practices of assessment and mstruction in middle school science classrooms. We conclude with a discussion of issues facing any substantial reform of science education A goal of the science education reform agendas (cf. American Association for the

“Doing Science” in Elementary School: Using Digital Technology to Foster the Development of Elementary Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry

EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

National efforts have described the need for students to develop scientific proficiency and have identified informal learning environments, interactive technologies, and an understanding of inquiry as ways to support this development. The Habitat Tracker project was developed in response to this need by developing a digitally-supported, inquiryoriented curriculum focused on engaging elementary students in science practices in formal and informal settings. This study employed a mixed methods approach to explore how engagement in the project affected 125 fourth and fifth grade elementary students' views of scientific inquiry and if certain aspects of scientific inquiry were shaped by student participation. The Views of Scientific Inquiry-Elementary School Version (VOSI-E), was administered before and after students had engaged with a three week Habitat Tracker curriculum and assessed aspects including the role of questions, diversity of methods, experiments and investigations, developing scientific explanations, supporting scientific explanations, predictions and hypotheses, role of subjectivity, role of creativity, and goal of science. VOSI-E responses were analyzed using a mixed methods approach. Chi-squared test results suggest that classroom learning coupled with visits to a wildlife center can help improve student understanding of scientific inquiry when integrated with technologyenhanced, field-based inquiries that emphasize the practices of science.

Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students' prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science

Journal of Research in Science …, 2008

Contextualizing science instruction involves utilizing students' prior knowledge and everyday experiences as a catalyst for understanding challenging science concepts. This study of two middle school science classrooms examined how students utilized the contextualizing aspects of projectbased instruction and its relationship to their science learning. Observations of focus students' participation during instruction were described in terms of a contextualizing score for their use of the project features to support their learning. Pre/posttests were administered and students' final artifacts were collected and evaluated. The results of these assessments were compared with students' contextualizing scores, demonstrating a strong positive correlation between them. These findings provide evidence to support claims of contextualizing instruction as a means to facilitate student learning, and point toward future consideration of this instructional method in broader research studies and the design of science learning environments.

INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE LEARNING AND STUDENT OUTCOME 1 Inquiry-Based Learning Strategies in Science Classrooms and Student Outcome

This paper addresses the discussion about the convenience of adopting student centered models for the study of natural science where the students play an important role in the learning process through inquiry. Recent results of science performance in PISA 2015 show a negative relationship between student performance and inquiry-based science instruction while, on the other hand, school systems that focus on teacher-directed science instruction have better outcomes . At first hand it would seem incorrect to shift science instruction to more cooperative and inquiry-based environments, but more indepth analysis shows there are two factors that have a positive impact in student performance in exams: one is the blending of student centered and direct instruction during the process of teaching and learning and the other is the school environment and classroom discipline . Since inquiry-based learning is a relatively new approach in the school environment, there are several years ahead to have conclusive evidence about the best practices in science instruction.

Developing and Assessing Elementary Teachers’ and Students’ Understandings of Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry

2000

Effective instruction related to nature of science (NOS) and scientific inquiry (SI) require teachers to develop a knowledge base as well as purposeful intentions to address NOS and SI within classroom instruction. Project ICAN: Inquiry, Context, and Nature of Science, an NSF-funded teacher enhancement project, aims to enhance teachers' abilities to improve students' understanding of NOS and students' understanding of, and ability to perform SI, within a context of standards-based instruction. In its fourth year, 58 teacherparticipants participated in the project that included three phases with the following sequence: summer orientation, monthly academic year workshops, and a three-week summer institute. Questionnaires, video-taped lessons, lesson plans, instructional materials/assessments, classroom observations, and student achievement comprised the data for examining the teaching and learning of NOS and SI. Participants demonstrated major enhancements in their understandings and their classroom applications of NOS as demonstrated in gains in their students' views. This report focuses on a case study of the knowledge and progress of a grades 1-2 teacher and the subsequent learning of her students. The particular reason for focusing on this case study is the continuing debate about the developmental appropriateness of NOS and SI outcomes for early elementary level students.

Develop a tool to measure the conceptual understanding of eighth grade science and determine its relationship with the academic performance of the experimental sciences course

Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 2016

The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and valid test to measure students' conceptual understanding in science course of eighth grade and investigate the relationship between conceptual understanding and academic performance in science among eighth grade students. The research method is descriptive that performed via survey. The study population consisted of all secondary school eighth grade students in the academic year 2015-2016 in Darab city. Using multi-stage random sampling method, 396 students, including 189 girls and 187 boys were selected. To collect data, a tool called Eighth Grade Science Conceptual Understanding Test (EGSCUT) was made in collaboration with eighth grade science teachers. It consists of 15 multiple-choice questions that have been prepared according to the eighth grade science book. To evaluate the test questions, difficulty level and discrimination index was calculated. And to check the TEST validity, content validity, CVR (0.59) and confirmatory factor analysis were used. The results showed that the test is valid enough. The test reliability using internal consistency, Kuder Richardson 20 and split-half obtained 0.86 and 0.83 respectively. The result showed that “Eighth Grade Science Conceptual Understanding Test (EGSCUT)” was appropriate to assess conceptual understanding in science among eighth grade students and has required validity and reliability. As a conclusion, conceptual understanding of eighth grade students in science can be accessed via assessment of their ability to apply and use knowledge. In addition, results showed that there is a significant positive relationship between academic performance and conceptual understanding of science. When students learn content conceptually, they can apply them in new situations and respond appropriately to different questions. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and valid test to measure students' conceptual understanding in science course of eighth grade and investigate the relationship between conceptual understanding and academic performance in science among eighth grade students. The research method is descriptive that performed via survey. The study population consisted of all secondary school eighth grade students in the academic year 2015-2016 in Darab city. Using multi-stage random sampling method, 396 students, including 189 girls and 187 boys were selected. To collect data, a tool called Eighth Grade Science Conceptual Understanding Test (EGSCUT) was made in collaboration with eighth grade science teachers. It consists of 15 multiple-choice questions that have been prepared according to the eighth grade science book. To evaluate the test questions, difficulty level and discrimination index was calculated. And to check the TEST validity, content validity, CVR (0.59) and confirmatory factor analysis were used. The results showed that the test is valid enough. The test reliability using internal consistency, Kuder Richardson 20 and split-half obtained 0.86 and 0.83 respectively. The result showed that “Eighth Grade Science Conceptual Understanding Test (EGSCUT)” was appropriate to assess conceptual understanding in science among eighth grade students and has required validity and reliability. As a conclusion, conceptual understanding of eighth grade students in science can be accessed via assessment of their ability to apply and use knowledge. In addition, results showed that there is a significant positive relationship between academic performance and conceptual understanding of science. When students learn content conceptually, they can apply them in new situations and respond appropriately to different questions.