Liberal Theology in the Weimar Era: Schleiermacher and the Question of Religious Subjectivity in the Methodenstreit between Georg Wobbermin and Karl Barth (original) (raw)
Related papers
Historiography and Theology. Theology in the Weimar Republic and the Beginning of the Third Reich
Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte 20:1, 2007.
The interpretation of the different roles played by Christian theology during the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich is deeply intertwined with current understandings of the nature and role of church and theology. This article is a critical discussion of the attempt of the “Munich school” centered around Trutz Rendtorff to liberate Protestant liberalism from the history writing of Karl Barth and the Barthian tradition. It discusses concrete issues of historiography dealing with Barth and liberal Protestants such as Ernst Troeltsch, Emanuel Hirsch, and Martin Rade, at the same time as it discusses how historiography is interrelated with theology, sociology, and politics.
Catholic Anti-Liberalism in Weimar: Political Theology and its Critics
Paper presented at a 2008 University of Wisconsin conference on "The Weimar Moment" and later published in the proceedings. The focus is Catholic opponents of the Nazis who were also ambivalent at best about liberal democracy. Primary attention to the neglected figure of the cultural historian Alois Dempf.
The Continuing Relevance of Karl Barth's Critique of Liberal Theology
The development of Karl Barth's theology – his disenchantment with liberalism and movement towards dogmatism, as well as the dialogue sparked by this development in the 20th century, speaks to the church of the 21 st century. This paper explores some dynamics of Barth's engagement with his liberal theological predecessors and neo-orthodox contemporaries in an effort to construct the beginnings of a critique of the Mainline Protestant Church today.
Church and Nation-State: Karl Barth and German public theology in the Early 20th Century
Ned Geref Teologiese Tydskrif 46:3-4, 2005.
This article deals with “1914” as both a paradigmatic and a formative moment for twentieth century theology. It was the failure of Protestantism, and Protestant public theology, but also of socialism, in the face of nationalism and war, that prompted Karl Barth to develop an alternative theology that came to be the most important alternative to the type of liberal Protestant public theology that dominated at that time and in various forms still dominates. The article describes how people like Ernst Troeltsch, Wilhelm Herrmann, Martin Rade, and Friedrich Naumann inscribed Christian theology into a nationalistic and agonistic socio-political imagination. Responsibility was seen as being responsible to reality so described. The role of this theology in 1914 forced Barth to a radical rethinking. The issue was the nature of reality, what it means to live in a world constituted by Jesus Christ.
Rudolf Otto and the Protestant Liberal Theology of His Age
The Holy in a pluralistic world. Rudolf Ottos legacy in the 21st Century, 2022
In the following chapter, I focus on Otto’s relation to the liberal tradition of Protestantism: after a brief overview of the basic motifs of the so-called Liberal Theology in Germany, I will discuss the relations between Otto and Liberal Theology, examining his biographical background, key aspects of his theological works, and passages from Otto’s correspondence that convey some apprehension about Liberal Theology. I claim that that, in the end, Otto was both inside and outside of the Liberal Theology tradition, and his relationship toward it is ultimately ambivalent: as a liberal thinker who found his academic home in the liberal climate of Göttingen, Otto finally became what can be called a crisis diagnostician of Liberal Theology, pitting the irrational and mysterious dimensions of Christian piety against the later so-called liberal Cultural Protestantism. In this way he became a key figure in the transformation of theology in the early 20th century and in the crisis of German Liberal Theology after the First World War that is still relevant for the debates about the future of theology today.
Dialog-a Journal of Theology, 2006
This essay, the third in a series introducing "the veritable renaissance" of scholarly attention to Protestant theology in Germany in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, examines the larger context of Protestant theology in the 1920s and the question of whether it was now continuous or discontinuous with what had gone before. Then, using the study by Matthias Wolfes, Protestantische Theologie und moderne Welt, we look at the work of three hitherto and long forgotten theologians-Horst Stephan, Georg Wehrung, and Georg Wobbermin-each of whom developed distinctive approaches to theology and ask about their significance for us in the present.
The debate about theology as science in Germany: 1835 to 1848
In this article, I argue that the roughly ten years following the publication of D.F. Strauss' Life of Jesus had far-reaching consequences for the German debate about theology as science. I suggest that Strauss modifies the previous status quaestionis by (1) making the scientific character of theology a matter of public concern; (2) aligning the Hegelian emphasis on science as knowledge with the emerging imperative of science as procedural research; and (3) indicating that this question was further connected with societal and political modernisation. The result was an explosive mixture as is evident from the passionate responses to Strauss' publication. His most extreme opponents, such as E.-W. Hengstenberg, were eager to accept his claim that modern theology = Hegelian 'pantheism' = political reform. Those closer to Strauss, on the other hand, notably other members of the Tübingen School, sought to moderate his claims by restricting the problem of theology's scientific character to an inner-university affair. On the other hand, more radical thinkers, such as Ludwig Feuerbach and Karl Marx, soon moved beyond Strauss' original proposal of a modern, philosophical Christianity. While Strauss' own position was thus repudiated on the right and the left, his main significance was as a catalyst for fundamental theological and intellectual transformations.