Living Situations: Combining Households and Overcrowding in the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area (original) (raw)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VIETNAMESE AND SALVADORAN REFUGEE GROUPS IN THE NATION'S CAPITAL, MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA: SOCIOECONOMIC CAPITAL, SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES, AND ASSIMILATION PATHS

2009

The Vietnamese and Salvadoran refugees compose the largest percentages of foreign-born immigrants in Washington D.C. Virginia and Maryland are also included in this research due to recent increase of Salvadoran and Vietnamese populations. However, Virginia is seen as a new settlement hub for both ethnic groups. The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics and socioeconomic status of these two groups in Washington D.C., Virginia, and Maryland. A comparative analysis of their socioeconomic status will reveal any similarities and differences between these two refugee groups. The 1980-2000 U.S. Census data will be used to compare settlement patterns of both ethnic groups. This research will heavily stress the role of socioeconomic as an interdependent on immigrant’s settlement pattern and path of assimilations. Thus, spatial analysis theories will be applied to an interpretation of their settlement types.

The Color of Wealth in the Nation's Capital

The 2007–09 Great Recession and housing crisis erased approximately half of Black and Latino households’ wealth, while Asians suffered the largest absolute lost in wealth (McKernan et al. 2014). Asian and Lation households tended to live in geographic areas that were hit hardest by the housing crisis (De La Cruz-Viesca, Hamilton, and Darity 2015). But the dramatic wealth disparities between White communities and communities of color long predate the dramatic economic downturn. This report explores racial and ethnic differences in net worth, focusing on Black families in Washington, DC, and shows, through a chronicle of their history in the city, how discrimination and systemic racism have contributed to today’s wealth gap in the nation’s capital.

Small and Medium Multifamily Housing Units: Affordability, Distribution, and Trends

Housing units within small and medium multi-family (SMMF) properties, defined as buildings with 2 to 49 units, comprise over 20% of the U.S. housing stock and are located primarily within the central cities or suburbs of metropolitan areas. However, this category of properties has sometimes been overlooked both in the media as well as in research, which have focused instead on the single-family and large multi-family (over 50 units) categories. Amalgamating the American Community Survey, American Housing Survey, and DataQuick databases, this study situates this segment of the U.S. housing stock in context by looking at cross-category comparisons and change over time. We map the geographic distribution of SMMF properties, describe their characteristics, and evaluate the degree to which they contribute to affordability within their specific market areas. Our data sets allow a rich examination of the variations both within the SMMF category and in comparison to the single-family and large multi-family property categories. The resulting analyses allow us to draw policy-relevant conclusions about this large segment of the housing stock and its importance in shaping housing supply and affordability at a national and regional level. *Email: yeokwana@usc.edu (University of Southern California), bostic@usc.edu (University of Southern California), ajakabovics@enterprisecommunity.org (Enterprise Community Partners), aorlando@usc.edu (University of Southern California), and rodnyans@usc.edu (University of Southern California). This research was funded in part by a generous grant from the JPMorgan Chase Foundation, and we gratefully acknowledge their support, as well as the University of Southern California's Bedrosian Center on Governance and the Public Enterprise. All errors are ours alone. 1