Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: The need for assessment and education (original) (raw)
Related papers
Contraindicated NSAIDs are frequently prescribed to elderly patients with peptic ulcer disease
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2002
Aims To establish the frequency with which NSAIDs were prescribed to elderly patients after admission to hospital for serious gastrointestinal complications and to study which factors are determinants of the prescription of these contraindicated drugs. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients from The Rotterdam Elderly Study, a prospective population-based cohort study of people older than 55 years of age was carried out. Elderly patients with a hospital admission for serious gastrointestinal complications were followed until prescription of an NSAID, death, removal to another area or end of the study period, whichever came ®rst. The following baseline determinants for receiving a contraindicated prescription were studied: gender, age, presence of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, number of GP visits, number of visits to a medical specialist, cognitive function and the prescriber being a GP or a medical specialist. Results Prescriptions of an NSAID after discharge from hospital, were identi®ed in 73 patients (73%). Fifty-one percent were prescribed aspirin of whom the large majority used it as an antithrombotic agent, and 49% were prescribed a nonaspirin NSAID after discharge from hospital. Twenty percent of the patients used more than one NSAID on one or more occasions after discharge. For patients who were prescribed NSAIDs before admission as well as after discharge, the proportion of contraindicated prescriptions with concomitant use of antiulcer drugs rose signi®cantly from 0.19 before discharge to 0.60 after discharge for aspirin and from 0.11 to 0.61 for nonaspirin NSAIDs. In the multivariate analysis the only remaining factor with prognostic in¯uence on prescription of NSAIDs was a history of NSAID use before cohort enrolment. A history of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis was not associated with NSAID prescription after discharge. Conclusions Contraindicated NSAIDs are prescribed to a great extent in elderly patients, despite their greater vulnerability for life-threatening gastrointestinal blood loss. It is remarkable that a history of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis is no signi®cant determinant for receiving a contraindicated prescription, which suggests that these drugs are mainly prescribed for uncomplicated arthralgia.
Rheumatology, 2005
Objectives. To examine prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in general practice and to compare the results with a 1993 study. To assess numbers at risk of gastrointestinal adverse events using the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on the use of cyclo-oxygenase (Cox) II selective drugs. Methods. Patients currently prescribed a NSAID for 2 months or more were identified from practice records. Demographic information, indications, previous gastrointestinal disease, serious co-morbidity and concomitant prescriptions were recorded. Data were compared with the 1993 survey and the NICE guidance. Results. Seven thousand nine hundred and fifty-eight patients were registered with the practice in 2003. Two hundred and four patients were receiving repeat prescriptions for conventional NSAIDs and 63 for Cox II selective drugs. As in 1993 diclofenac (38%) and ibuprofen (24%) were the commonest individual agents and the main indication was regional pain. Seventy-three per cent of patients prescribed Cox II selective drugs and 64% of patients prescribed conventional NSAIDs had at least one NICE risk factor for gastrointestinal adverse events. Frequency of co-prescription of aspirin or antacids was similar for conventional NSAIDs and Cox II selective drugs, but prescription of antacids was higher with NICE risk factors. Conclusion. The indications for NSAIDs have not changed since 1993. Cox II selective drug prescribing was within the NICE guidance but a substantial proportion of patients taking other NSAIDs had risk factors for gastrointestinal adverse events. Discussion with the GPs highlighted the difficulties of balancing perceived risk of gastrointestinal adverse events with cardioprotection and further guidance is urgently needed.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2002
Aims To establish the frequency with which NSAIDs were prescribed to elderly patients after admission to hospital for serious gastrointestinal complications and to study which factors are determinants of the prescription of these contraindicated drugs. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients from The Rotterdam Elderly Study, a prospective population-based cohort study of people older than 55 years of age was carried out. Elderly patients with a hospital admission for serious gastrointestinal complications were followed until prescription of an NSAID, death, removal to another area or end of the study period, whichever came ®rst. The following baseline determinants for receiving a contraindicated prescription were studied: gender, age, presence of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, number of GP visits, number of visits to a medical specialist, cognitive function and the prescriber being a GP or a medical specialist. Results Prescriptions of an NSAID after discharge from hospital, were identi®ed in 73 patients (73%). Fifty-one percent were prescribed aspirin of whom the large majority used it as an antithrombotic agent, and 49% were prescribed a nonaspirin NSAID after discharge from hospital. Twenty percent of the patients used more than one NSAID on one or more occasions after discharge. For patients who were prescribed NSAIDs before admission as well as after discharge, the proportion of contraindicated prescriptions with concomitant use of antiulcer drugs rose signi®cantly from 0.19 before discharge to 0.60 after discharge for aspirin and from 0.11 to 0.61 for nonaspirin NSAIDs. In the multivariate analysis the only remaining factor with prognostic in¯uence on prescription of NSAIDs was a history of NSAID use before cohort enrolment. A history of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis was not associated with NSAID prescription after discharge. Conclusions Contraindicated NSAIDs are prescribed to a great extent in elderly patients, despite their greater vulnerability for life-threatening gastrointestinal blood loss. It is remarkable that a history of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis is no signi®cant determinant for receiving a contraindicated prescription, which suggests that these drugs are mainly prescribed for uncomplicated arthralgia.
Drugs & Aging, 2007
associated with gastrointestinal (GI) complications and potential mortality, these medications continue to be widely prescribed in the elderly. Age is a significant risk factor for NSAID-induced GI events; indeed, patients >75 years of age carry the highest risk and are similar in this respect to patients with a history of peptic ulcer. Prevention of NSAID-induced gastropathy is indicated in patients at risk. It is accepted that patients >60 years of age taking NSAIDs should participate in prevention strategies such as co-therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or misoprostol, or use of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective NSAIDs (also called coxibs). Although up to 33% of subjects with no risk factors who receive NSAIDs over-utilise GI preventive therapies, under-utilisation of gastroprotective therapy is more prevalent among those with risk factors, of which the most frequent is age. At least half of those at risk do not receive appropriate preventive therapy, either because they do not receive co-therapy with PPIs or misoprostol or are not treated with COX-2 selective NSAIDs, or because they receive co-therapy with antacids or histamine H2 receptor antagonists, which are not effective. Adherence to the prescribed preventive therapy is an additional problem for those who are prescribed a PPI or misoprostol. Over 30% of patients are non-adherent and the lowest rate of non-adherence is associated with the first NSAID prescription,
Age and Ageing, 2007
Objectives: the objectives of this study were to (i) survey the risk factors for NSAID gastropathy in outpatients (elderly patients in the community), compared to those living in old people's homes or nursing homes, (ii) study the prescription of medication prophylaxis during use of NSAIDs conform the current national guidelines and (iii) survey the influence on gastrointestinal symptoms and safety of pantoprazole 20 mg as prophylaxis for NSAID gastropathy. Methods: patients over 65 years of age, using an NSAID without prophylaxis or newly starting NSAID treatment were included in the study. Pantoprazole 20 mg was prescribed as prophylaxis. Patients using an NSAID with prophylaxis being a proton pump inhibitor at the first visit were registered for epidemiological reasons. Demographic data, risk factors, gastrointestinal complaints, and adverse events were collected at t = 0, t = 2 weeks, t = 3 months and t = 6 months. Differences between groups were analysed with Chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests; changes in time in GI symptoms were tested using Wilcoxon signed ranks tests and McNemar tests. Results: one hundred eighty one general practitioners (treating outpatients and patients in old people's homes) and five nursing home physicians participated in the study and a total of 615 patients were included (522 patients treated by general practitioners (GP) and 93 patients in nursing homes). Four hundred thirty two patients were using NSAIDs without prophylaxis or started using an NSAID at the first visit; 269 (62.1%) and 163 (37.9%) patients respectively. 65.3% of the outpatients (224 out of 343) did not receive indicated prophylaxis, versus 76.2% (16 out of 21) in old people's homes and 42.6% in nursing homes (29 out of 69) (P<0.001). Patients in nursing homes had more risk factors for gastrointestinal complications (2.94 ± 1.3 versus 1.77 ± 0.9) than outpatients. More patients using an NSAID prior to the study complained of gastrointestinal symptoms compared to new users (P<0.001). This seems to indicate that NSAIDs caused these symptoms. After 2 weeks of treatment with pantoprazole, there was no statistical difference between the two groups. Moreover, both groups showed improvement in complaints (P<0.001). Only nine patients in the study population (3.1%) reported mild adverse events (e.g. nausea, headache) with an average of 1.1 adverse events per patient. Five patients (1% of the included population) died during the study period, but there was no relation to the NSAID or pantoprazole. Discussion and Conclusion: patients in nursing homes had more risk factors for NSAID gastropathy than patients in old people's homes or outpatients (>65 years). Although in nursing homes co-prescription of prophylaxis during NSAID use is more common, in general the Dutch guidelines on adequate NSAID use are still not fully implemented at this moment. The results also showed that pantoprazole was effective in diminishing gastrointestinal complaints, as well as preventing symptomatic NSAID gastropathy. Moreover, pantoprazole showed to be a safe and well-tolerated drug in our treatment group.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2011
Objective To assess the appropriateness of gastroprotective agents (GPA)\ NSAID use in patients' access medication through community pharmacy and the factors associated with any inappropriateness found. Methods A cross-sectional study in which patients requesting NSAIDs through community pharmacy was undertaken. Information was collected through a structured questionnaire included data of patients' pharmacotherapy and gastropathy risk factors. Patients were classified as ''overprotected'' or ''underprotected'' according to the use of gastroprotective-drugs and presence/absence of gastropathy risk factors. We calculated the risk for under-or over-protection using logistic regression controlling for potential confounders. Results Twenty-seven community pharmacies of Southeast of Spain participated in the study. Out of 670 NSAID users recruited in the study, 243 (36.3%) were not appropriately protected: 197(81.1%) patients were underprotected, and 46 (18.9%) patients were overprotected. Compared to patients with ulcer history, patients with cardiovascular disease or chronic morbidity (aOR 18.55; 95% CI l 3.68-93.52, P \ 0.001) and aged over 60 years (aOR 23.97; 95% CI 3.93-145.9) were associated with underuse of gastroprotective-drugs. OTC-NSAID-users were more likely to be underprotected than those with medical prescription (aOR 3.47; 95% CI l 1.84-6.55). Conclusions Inappropriate GPA use is relatively frequent among NSAD users, especially in those using OTC-NSAIDs. Community pharmacists should be aware of factors contributing to NSAID-induced GI complications and assess its presence in the consumer when dispensing an OTC-NSAID. Keywords Community pharmacy Á Gastroprotective drugs Á Non Steroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs Á OTCdrugs Á Risk factors Á Spain Impact of findings on practice • 36.3% of NSAID users in Spain are not appropriately protected against potential gastrointestinal toxicity: 29.4% are underprotected and 6. 9% are overprotected. • Self-medication users tend to be underprotected while medical prescription users have more risk of being overprotected. • Educational programmes for doctors and pharmacists are needed to improve the use of gastroprotection with NSAID use, where appropriate. • Community pharmacists should ultimately be responsible for the educational programs, especially with regard to the self-medication of patients.
Prescription audit of NSAIDs and gastroprotective strategy in elderly in primary care
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 2017
BACKGROUND: The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) is deemed a major risk factor for peptic ulcer disease in elderly population that requires concomitant therapy with gastroprotective agents (GPAs). OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the rational prescribing of NSAIDs and GPAs, and extent of adherence to the guideline recommendations in primary care. METHODS: Nationwide audit of prescriptions issued to elderly patients (≥65 years) with hypertension or diabetic hypertension in primary care. RESULTS: Among 2090 elderly, 45.9% were on low-dose aspirin, and 13.5% on other NSAIDs. Diclofenac-XR was the most frequently prescribed NSAIDs to three-quarter patients whereas naproxen, the safest NSAID for patients with high cardiovascular (CV) risk, was rarely prescribed. Among those on NSAID, 82.9% were on a scheduled dosing regimen; of these 78.8% received long-term NSAID therapy (3.9 ± 0.9 months). The prescription rate of GPAs was low: 29.2% for aspirin and 33.3% for other NSAIDs. A quarter of the patients on histamine type-2 receptor antagonists received ranitidine at subtherapeutic single-dose for gastroprotection. Approximately half of the patients on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were prescribed supra-therapeutic double-dose regimen: omeprazole and esomeprazole accounted for 63.2% of overall prescribed PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: The rational choice of NSAIDs and physicians' adherence to gastroprotective measures was suboptimal in primary care. The choice of NSAIDs and gastroprotective strategy in elderly be guided by the CV and gastrointestinal adverse events likelihood due to the NSAIDs and risk profile of patients for such adverse events.
Underutilization of preventive strategies in patients receiving NSAIDs
Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2003
Multiple treatment guidelines for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) suggest that patients with one or more risk factors for NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal (UGI) ulcer complications should be prescribed preventive strategies such as acid-suppressive drugs, misoprostol or cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitors to reduce their risk of serious ulcer complications. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the extent to which new NSAID users receive recommended preventive strategies and to assess the association between risk factors and a prescription of acid suppressive drugs or misoprostol. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database, a longitudinal database of electronic general practitioner patient records in The Netherlands. The study population comprised all new NSAID users, defined as users of non-specific NSAIDs, COX-2-preferential NSAIDs and COX-2-specific inhibitors, duri...
Practice Advisory on the Appropriate Use of NSAIDs in Primary Care
Journal of Pain Research
Cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are important in managing acute and chronic pain secondary to inflammation. As a greater understanding of the risks of gastrointestinal (GI), cardiovascular (CV) and renal events with NSAIDs use has emerged, guidelines have evolved to reflect differences in risks among NSAIDs. Updated guidelines have yet to reflect new evidence from recent trials which showed similar CV event rates with celecoxib compared to naproxen and ibuprofen, and significantly better GI tolerability for celecoxib. This practice advisory paper aims to present consensus statements and associated guidance regarding appropriate NSAID use based on a review of current evidence by a multidisciplinary group of expert clinicians. This paper is especially intended to guide primary care practitioners within Asia in the appropriate use of NSAIDs in primary care. Following a literature review, group members used a modified Delphi consensus process to determine agreement with selected recommendations. Agreement with a statement by 75% of total voting members was defined a priori as consensus. For low GI risk patients, any nonselective NSAID plus proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or celecoxib alone is acceptable treatment when CV risk is low; for high CV risk patients, low-dose celecoxib or naproxen plus PPI is appropriate. For high GI risk patients, celecoxib plus PPI is acceptable for low CV risk patients; low-dose celecoxib plus PPI is appropriate for high CV risk patients, with the alternative to avoid NSAIDs and consider opioids instead. Appropriate NSAID prescription assumes that the patient has normal renal function at commencement, with ongoing monitoring recommended. In conclusion, appropriate NSAID use requires consideration of all risks.
Current gerontology and geriatrics research, 2012
Optimization of current pain management strategies is necessary in order to reduce medication risks. Promoting patient and healthcare provider education on pain and pain medications is an essential step in reducing inadequate prescribing behaviors and adverse events. In an effort to raise awareness on medication safety, the FDA has launched the Safe Use Initiative program. The program seeks to identify areas with the greatest amount of preventable harm and help promote new methods and practices to reduce medication risks. Since the establishment of the program, FDA's Safe Use initiative staff convened a panel of key opinion leaders throughout the medical community to address pain management in older adults (≥65 years of age). The aim of the expert panel was to focus on areas where significant risk occurs and where potential interventions will be feasible, implementable, and lead to substantial impact. The panel suggested one focus could be the use of NSAIDs for pain management i...