The Universal Fuel at Sea: Replacing F-76 with JP-5 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Improved Navy Ship Fuel Systems
Naval Engineers Journal, 1999
The forward deployment of a naval task force is dependent upon the performance of the Underway Replemshment (UNREP) systems, especially Fueling At Sea (FAS). A series of office of Naval Research (ONR) sponsored developments are reviewed that will help Navy ships to achieve current and future FAS requirements with reduced manning, Life Cycle Cost (LCC), and risk of pollution. The following developments are presented I DDG 51 class Improved Fuel Fill Control System (IFFCS) development and DDG 57 at sea demonstration. Combat Logistic Force (CLF) Fuel 'Ikansfer Recording System and the AOE 8 installation and operating experience. CV/CVN Fuel Tank Monitoring and Display System development. I Improved UNREP Phone, Distance, and Data Link System development. I Tensioned Hose Fueling At Sea System (THFASS) Development.
WMU journal of marine affairs special issue
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2015
They cover issues of considerable importance in the maritime industry and reflect new developments in the industry of interest to shipping lines, the ports that serve them and governments seeking to bring policy in line with modern shipping practice. More specifically, the first four papers discuss the environmental aspects ranging from environmentally-friendly technologies in shipping and designing for emissions allocation in container shipping to the use of LNG-fueled vessels in China and the development of LNG bunkering facilities in North European ports. These four papers indicate the significant interest in new technologies, emissions calculations, and the greening of the industry and are particularly relevant for readers interested in what the future may hold. Those developing new technologies have long considered how to improve technology uptake and ensure that technologies become more widely adopted, eventually becoming mainstream. The first paper titled Towards understanding the stepwise dissemination of shipping technologies suggests that adoption does not follow a logical and incremental path but rather a stepwise one where shifts in adoption are significant and abrupt. It provides food for thought to those seeking to understand the conditions by which technologies are adopted, and the concerns that face those with new technologies and hoping for their adoption. There are many in the industry that believe that the impacts should be obvious and that the uptake of new concepts will be logical and predictable. This paper, by arguing for an alternative adoption trajectory, provides insights into what is more likely to happen. It suggests that those with new technologies in development might consider building a program that enhances the probability of
Production of JP-8-Based Hydrogen and Advanced Tactical Fuels for the US Military
2009
Government agencies only (fill in reason) (date of determination). Other requests for this document shall be referred to (insert controlling DoD office) • DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C. Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (fill in reason) (date of determination). Other requests for this document shall be referred to (insert controlling DoD office) • DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D. Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and U.S. DoD contractors only (fill in reason) (date of determination). Other requests shall be referred to (insert controlling DoD office). • DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT E. Distribution authorized to DoD Components only (fill in reason) (date of determination). Other requests shall be referred to (insert controlling DoD office). • DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT F. Further dissemination only as directed by (inserting controlling DoD office) (date of determination) or higher DoD authority. Distribution Statement F is also used when a document does not contain a distribution statement and no distribution statement can be determined. D DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT X. Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and private individuals or enterprises eligible to obtain export-controlled technical data in accordance with DoDD 5230.25; (date of determination). DoD Controlling Office is (insert controlling DoD office).
Feasibility of using alternate fuels in the U.S. Antarctic Program : initial assessment
2017
Currently, the U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) has standardized using AN8 fuel for all air operations and the majority of its ground based operations. The freeze-point (FP) specification for AN8 is −58°C. The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) conducted an analysis of the air temperature history at McMurdo, South Pole, and the WAIS (West Antarctic Ice Sheet) Divide camp to determine if USAP could feasibly use alternate, less expensive aircraft fuels. Also, to provide context, this report details the USAP fuel purchasing methodology and price calculation. JP-8 (and Jet A-1) has an FP specification of −47°C, which is well below the minimum average daily air temperature at McMurdo (−40°C) and is also below the storage temperature of the fuel at South Pole (−45°C). The estimated fuel temperature at the WAIS Divide camp is above the FP of JP-8 during the operational season. Based on these findings, it may be possible to use JP-8 to replace ground-based applications where AN8 is currently used. Evidence suggests that JP-8 can replace the AN8 used for all flight operations, also. DISCLAIMER: The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. All product names and trademarks cited are the property of their respective owners. The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents.
IRJET- APPLICATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS IN MARITIME INDUSTRY
Alternative Fuel, means fuels or power sources which serve, at least partly, as a substitute for fossil oil sources in the energy supply to transport and which have the potential to contribute to its decarbonization and enhance the environmental performance of the transport sector. The development and use of alternative fuels as well as appropriate infrastructure in the European territory are essential to meet the requirements of the Directive on Sulphur content in marine fuels and to reduce the dependence of transport on oil. Fossil-based fuels, such as LNG will have limited contribution to greenhouse gas reductions, while biofuels have the potential to lead to drastic reductions. On a technical level, the introduction of alternative fuels will be accompanied by additional complexity, in the areas of fuel supply infrastructure, rules for safe use of fuels on board, and operation of new systems. It is expected that a number of different fuels may become important in different markets around the world, depending on local availability of fuels, which will add to the complexity
Drop‐in alternative jet fuels: status of DoD's RDT&E, interagency initiatives, and policies
The U.S. military has been investing in drop-in alternative fuels production research and development, and testing and evaluation (in laboratories and test engines), for decades. As the Department predominantly consumes jet fuel, the Department of Defense's alternative fuel efforts largely follows the work of the commercial aviation industry. This talk will provide an update on alternative drop-in fuel qualification efforts being pursued by ASTM and the Military Services; recently codified DoD policies that impact the Department's investments in and usage of alternative fuels; the Defense Production Act Advanced Drop-in Biofuels Production Project (ADBPP), in which DoD and DOE are investing in construction of commercial biofuel production facilities; the Navy's Great Green Fleet initiative and Farm-to-Fleet partnership with USDA to support procurement of drop-in biofuels for the Navy; and findings from a recent GAO report on the DoD's alternative fuel initiatives.
2009
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.