Organized economic interests: Diversity and change in an enlarged Europe (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Place of Organized Interests within the European Institutions
Interest group regulation in European governance is crucial to a full understanding of how power is exercised within the European Union (EU) and for a more accurate description of how the EU political system functions (and of its underlying principles). One of the main issues here is how private or specific interests engage with a general or public interest embodied in one way or another by those acting for the EU. Given the range of sensitive issues at stake, it is hardly surprising that the question of regulation meets with considerable resistance, especially in the Commission. However, recent obstacles to European integration have had the effect of relaunching a debate that makes ethics and transparency core parts of the agenda. Current political dynamics seem to testify to a growing EU receptiveness to the claims of the ALTER-EU movement which seeks a more highly regulated environment for EU lobbyists and officials.
The Changing Politics of Organised Interests
West European Politics, 2008
Since the mid-1970s, Western European politics have undergone significant changes – and this has been particularly marked in the arena of ‘interest politics’. In this article I list some apodictic statements about these changes and speculate about their potential explanations. To the extent that these descriptive generalisations have some accuracy and that the potential explanations have some validity, we can then conclude that the hegemony of political parties is declining. This is not to say that parties will be replaced by either associations or movements. These three forms of representation are not locked into a zero-sum game. In the past, they have grown together and supported each other. Nothing says that they cannot also decline together in the present. What we can say, however, is that there has been a generalised loosening of the links between interests and organisations.
Journal of European Public Policy, 2015
The number of interest organizations (density) varies across policy domains, political issues and economic sectors. This shapes the nature and outcomes of interest representation. In this paper, we explain the density of interest organizations per economic sector in the European Union on the basis of political and economic institutional factors. Focusing on business interest representation, we show that economic institutions structure the 'supply' of interest organizations by affecting the number of potential constituents, the resources available for lobbying and the geographical level of collective action of businesses. In contrast, we do not find consistent evidence that political institutions produce 'demand' for interest organizations by making laws, developing public policy or spending money. This is in contrast to the extensive evidence that such factors affect lobbying practices. The EU interest system is (partially) shaped by economic factors, relatively independent from public policy or institutions.
The Europeanization of interest groups: Group type, resources and policy area
European Union Politics, 2014
Large variation exists in the extent to which national interest groups focus on European Union (EU) legislation and carry out their political activities in Brussels and Strasbourg. What explains this variation? We propose a series of hypotheses that suggest that business groups, and groups active in policy areas with high EU competence, are more Europeanized than other groups. The effect of group type, moreover, is conditional on the material resources a group possesses: we expect the difference between business and non-business groups to be largest for actors that are well endowed with material resources. Using novel data on 880 national associations, gained from a survey of interest groups in five European countries, we find support for these hypotheses. The article has implications for the literatures on lobbying, Europeanization, and theories of European integration.
The Europeanization of Interest Groups: National Associations in Multilevel Europe
Early theorists of European integration expected that political actors such as interest groups would shift their political activities towards the new centre, leading to further political integration in Europe. Half a century later, we assess this expectation and find large variation in the extent to which national interest groups focus on European Union (EU) legislation and have shifted their political activities to Brussels and Strasbourg. What explains this variation? We propose a series of hypotheses that focus on group type, group resources, policy field and the size of the group's home country. Using data on 880 national associations, gained from a survey of interest groups in five European countries, we find support for these hypotheses. The paper has implications for the literatures on lobbying, decision-making in the EU, Europeanization and theories of European integration.
Who lobbies the European Union? National interest groups in a multilevel polity
Journal of European Public Policy, 2012
What explains variation across national interest groups in their amount of lobbying on legislative proposals in the European Union (EU)? We present an argument that leads to the expectation that resource-rich associations engage in more lobbying on EU legislation than other associations. Moreover, we expect business associations to have privileged access to the European Commission and national governments; and citizens' groups to parliaments. Using original data from a survey of 1417 interest groups in Germany, Ireland and Spain, we find support for these expectations. We conclude that national associations are heavily involved in EU lobbying, but that resource-endowment and type matter for access. The paper is of relevance to the literatures on interest groups in the EU, the EU's (alleged) democratic deficit, and the role of civil society in governance beyond the nation state.