Mechanical evaluation of six types of reconstruction following 25, 50, and 75% resection of the proximal femur (original) (raw)
Related papers
Revision of the Deficient Proximal Femur With a Proximal Femoral Allograft
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
Substantial bone loss is frequently encountered with revision hip arthroplasty. A proximal femoral allograft may be used to reconstitute bone stock in the multiply revised femur with segmental bone loss of greater than 5 cm. We retrospectively reviewed 92 patients (93 hips) who underwent such proximal femoral allografts. The average age at the surgery was 61 years. The average number of previous revision procedures was 2.5. Six patients were lost to followup. Thirty-four of 36 deceased patients had the original proximal femoral allograft at the time of death. The minimum followup for the 50 remaining patients was 15 years (average, 16.2 years; range, 15-22 years). Analysis included survivorship and radiographic assessment. Of the 50 patients reviewed, two had a failed reconstruction due to infection, six for aseptic loosening, three for nonunion, and four for dislocation. Revision of the proximal femoral allograft for all reasons excluding the acetabulum was performed in seven patients. At last followup, 42 patients (84%) had a well-functioning construct. Proximal femoral allograft for revision hip arthroplasty in femoral segmental bone loss is a durable alternative in most patients for a complex problem.
Proximal Femur Reconstruction by an Allograft Prosthesis Composite
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002
Twenty-seven patients who had resection of the proximal femur for bone tumors and reconstruction with an allograft prosthesis composite are reported. In most of the patients, the prosthesis was a long-stem revision type, cemented in the allograft and uncemented in the femoral shaft. The abductor muscles and iliopsoas were sutured to the corresponding tendons on the allograft. Implant-related complications and functional results were evaluated and are reported. Twenty-two patients achieved a minimum followup of 36 months (range, 36-126 months; average, 58 months). The implant was removed in two patients (one for infection, one for intraoperative fracture of the allograft). One patient experienced nonunion, whereas in the remaining 24 patients, the allograft eventually united to the host bone. A frequent late complication (17 patients) was fracture of the greater trochanter of the allograft. In the whole series, only four new operations were done for implant-related complications. In 22 patients who could be evaluated, the functional evaluation according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society System was excellent in 16 (73%) patients, good in four (18%), and fair in two (9%). These results compare favorably with those of megaprostheses for tumor resection of the proximal femur, where a Trendelenburg gait almost always is present.
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2018
Background: Large bone deficiencies are a challenging problem, historically treated with an allograftprosthetic composite (APC) or megaprosthesis. There were several advantages of the APC compared with early megaprostheses, including the theoretical benefit of restoring bone stock. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have evaluated this claim. Our purpose was to review our institution's experience with APCs of the proximal femur that underwent revision for an aseptic cause and determine if the allograft bone was retained or removed during the revision procedure. Methods: We identified 203 proximal femoral allograft prosthetic composites placed from 1988 through 2014. Twenty-seven of these patients underwent a revision because of an aseptic cause. Three categories were devised to classify the amount of allograft retention: type A, complete allograft retention; type B, partial retention; and type C, no allograft retention. Results: The mean time from the initial APC to revision surgery was 5 years. The most common indication for revision included failure of the allograft (loosening or fracture). At the time of revision, there were 3 type A cases (11%), 4 type B cases (15%), and 20 type C cases (74%). Three of the 4 type B cases used the retained allograft as a strut graft around a newly inserted megaprosthesis. Conclusion: The results of this study are contradictory to previous literature that suggests APCs restore bone stock. In this series, the allograft was retained in only a small percentage of cases when the APC was revised for an aseptic cause. Level of Evidence: IV.
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2014
revision hip replacement allograft prosthesis composite major segmental bone loss proximal femur This study assessed failures of allograft prosthesis composites (APC) and revisions with a new APC. Twentyone patients with failed APC's after revision hip arthroplasty with severe proximal femoral bone loss underwent revision with a new APC. Causes of failure were aseptic loosening (18 patients), infection (3 patients). Of these 21 APC revisions, two patients failed (after 60, 156 months). The 5 and 10 year survival rates were 83.5% (95% CI, 79-100%, number at risk 12 and 6 accordingly). In addition, two patients had nonunion at the host-allograft bone junction and were augmented with bone autograft and plate. These results suggest that failed APCs may be revised to a new APC with a predictable outcome.
Long-Term Followup of Proximal Femoral Allografts
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002
Between 1972 and 1999, the orthopaedic service at the authors' institution treated 137 patients with proximal femoral bone lesions by resection and reconstruction with frozen allografts from cadavers. The data were entered into a computer program allowing a comprehensive analysis. Thirtyeight patients had proximal femoral osteoarticular allografts, 69 had allograft-endoprosthesis composites, 22 had intercalary allografts, and eight had an allograft arthrodesis. There were 74 complications in 54 of the 137 patients with allografts, which included 26 allograft fractures (19%), 15 infections (11%), and 20 nonunions (15%). The overall success rate for the patients with these procedures was 103 of 137 (75%) at a mean followup of 7.9 years ؎ 5.6 years. If the eight patients with tumor recurrences (surgical failures rather than allograft failures) are not included, the success rate is 103 of 129 (80%). Eighty-three of these patients (55%) without any allograft complications who have been treated and followed up for at least 2 years had a 92% success rate. It is concluded that although allograft reconstruction after resection of the proxi-mal femur for patients with aggressive or malignant tumors has a high complication rate, approximately 80% of the patients have a successful outcome.
Extensively coated revision stems in proximally deficient femur: early results in 15 patients
Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2008
Hip replacement following failed internal fixation (dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures) or previous hip arthroplasty presents a major surgical challenge. Proximal fitting revision stems do not achieve adequate fixation. Distal fixation with long-stemmed extensively coated cementless implants (like the Solution system) affords a suitable solution. We present our early results of 15 patients treated with extensively coated cementless revision stems. Fifteen patients with severely compromised proximal femora following either failed hip arthroplasty or failed internal fixation (dynamic hip screw fixation for intertrochanteric fractures) were operated by the senior author over a two-year period. Eight patients had aseptic loosening of their femoral stems following cemented hip replacements, with severe thinning of their proximal cortices and impending stress fractures. Seven had secondary hip arthritis following failure of long implants for comminuted intertrochanteric or ...
Cementless Femoral Reconstruction in Patients With Proximal Femoral Deformity
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2011
Distorted proximal femoral anatomy can pose a great technical challenge during total hip arthroplasty. Fifty-eight total hip arthroplasty were performed in 51 patients with proximal femoral deformity from 1998 to 2006. All hips except 2 were treated with cementless prosthesis. Twenty-three patients had a retained hardware that had to be removed. Nonprimary cementless components were used in 22 (25%) femurs. In 21 (23%) hips, osteotomy was required to properly fit the cementless stem in the femur. At the time of latest follow-up (4 years on average), functional scores showed significant improvement. Radiographically, all femoral components showed stable bone ingrowth except 2 hips (3.5%) with stable fibrous ingrowth and 1 hip (2%) with loosening. There were 2 (3.5%) revisions in 2 patients for periprosthetic fracture and femoral loosening. The mechanical failure rate was 9% (5 hips). Despite technical difficulties, cementless femoral reconstruction provides a reliable and durable result in patients with proximal femoral deformity. Keywords: reconstruction, femur, proximal femoral deformity.
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 2012
Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic results from patients who underwent femoral reconstruction secondary to loosening of total hip arthroplasty, using circumferential proximal femoral allografts and cemented implants. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 32 patients (33 hips) who underwent femoral reconstruction secondary to loosening of total hip arthroplasty, using circumferential proximal femoral allografts and cemented implants. Among these patients, 28 (29 hips) fulfilled all the requirements for this study. The mean follow-up was five years and two months. The clinical evaluation was done in accordance with the Harris Hip Score. Radiographically, the patients were assessed regarding reabsorption and consolidation of the allograft, migration of the greater trochanter, stability of the femoral component and heterotypic calcification. Results: The average preoperative Harris Hip Score was 32 points. At the last postoperative follow-up, the average score was 82 points. Allograft resorption of some degree was seen in nine hips (31%). Regarding consolidation, 24 cases (82.8%) showed full consolidation, three (10.3%) showed partial consolidation and two (6.9%) showed pseudarthrosis. All femoral components were stable. According to the criteria established, 27 cases (93.1%) were considered to be successful reconstructions after a mean follow-up of five years and two months. Conclusion: From the results obtained, it was concluded that use of circumferential proximal femoral allografts in selected cases of femoral reconstruction secondary to loosening of arthroplasty presented a high survival rate from the reconstruction over an average follow-up of five years and two months.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 2010
We report the use of an allograft prosthetic composite for reconstruction of the skeletal defect in complex revision total hip replacement for severe proximal femoral bone loss. Between 1986 and 1999, 72 patients (20 men, 52 women) with a mean age of 59.9 years (38 to 78) underwent reconstruction using this technique. At a mean follow-up of 12 years (8 to 20) 57 patients were alive, 14 had died and one was lost to follow-up. Further revision was performed in 19 hips at a mean of 44.5 months (11 to 153) post-operatively. Causes of failure were aseptic loosening in four, allograft resorption in three, allograft nonunion in two, allograft fracture in four, fracture of the stem in one, and deep infection in five. The survivorship of the allograft-prosthesis composite at ten years was 69.0% (95% confidence interval 67.7 to 70.3) with 26 patients remaining at risk. Survivorship was statistically significantly affected by the severity of the pre-operative bone loss (Paprosky type IV; p = 0.019), the number of previous hip revisions exceeding two (p = 0.047) , and the length of the allograft used (p = 0.005).