From Hard History to Soft History: Cultural Histories of the Korean Working Class (original) (raw)
Related papers
Review of Hyung-A Kim's Korean Skilled Workers: Toward a Labor Aristocracy
Journal of Social History, 2021
Hyung-A Kim's Korean Skilled Workers: Toward a Labor Aristocracy tells the story of South Korea's first generation of skilled industrial workers and their sociopolitical transformation over four decades. Kim explains how these "industrial warriors" were originally recruited through an authoritarian system for stateimposed skills training, through technical high schools and vocational training programs, and then served as the bulwark of state-led heavy and chemical industrialization (HCI). They were employed by the most prominent Korean, family-owned conglomerates called chaebȏl in the 1970s and thereafter. These industrial warriors, however, evolved into self-proclaimed "goliath warriors" and led the democratic labor union movement in a working class struggle against the state and chaebȏl from 1987 to the early-1990s. By the early 2000s, they emerged as the "labor aristocracy," distinguishing themselves from other lower-tier workers of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and contingent nonregular workers, and enjoying privileges that included superior wages and guaranteed job security. https://academic.oup.com/jsh/article-abstract/55/2/551/6041751
2014
Les relations du travail en Corée en transition: flexibilité autoritaire? Dae-oup Chang Le but de cet article est d’examiner la signification des changements dans les relations de travail avant et après la crise économique au regard des nouvelles formes émergentes de subordination des tra-vailleurs au capital à travers diverses mesures de flexiblilisation, cela tant au niveau national qu’au sein des milieux de travail. La période comprise entre 1987 et 1996 fut marquée, dans l’histoire du développe-ment capitaliste coréen, par la confrontation entre le capital et le travail, rapport qui s’est cristallisé dans la formation d’un « mouvement de syn-dicats démocratiques » hautement politisé. Ce n’est qu’à partir de la crise économique de 1997 que l’État capitaliste et les entrepreneurs privés ont pu regagner un contrôle effectif sur le facteur travail en soumettant ce dernier aux impératifs de la logique marchande. En d’autres termes, c’est le marché du travail flexiblilisé, basé sur un...
Mass Dictatorship: Collusion and Evasion in Everyday Life, 2016
Japanese colonial bureaucrats in Korea made frequent references to ‘industrial warriors’ and announced special material provisions and awarded medals to Korean workers during WWII. The Japanese hoped to solve the empire-wide labour shortage through the mobilisation of workers, and the paise given to labour heroes was a part of this broader campaign. The Japanese used both coercion and material incentives for their mobilisation. A careful focus on the theme of ‘industrial warriors’ can be useful in highlighting the complexities of the mobilisation system. The fact that so many Korean workers had been mobilised so far away from their homes meant that the Japanese had to pay special attention managing their 'leisure time'. In essence, they had to devise a way of keeping the Korean workers preoccupied and entertained when they were outside the factories and mines. Therefore, behind the rhetoric of the ‘industrial warriors’ was an attempt to restructure everyday life and introduced a more totalistic conception of industrial labour management under a ‘rationalised’ modernity.
A Socialist Century? Socialism as the Main Counter-Hegemonic Ideology of Contemporary Korea
Korea Journal, 2020
Some scholars have recently discussed the supposed failure of socialism in South Korea. By failure, they tend to refer to the low parliamentary representation of social-democratic parties in today's South Korea, as well as a high degree of working-class fragmentation. I argue here that the rhetoric of failure does not do justice to the entirety of socialist experience in post-division South Korea. It is undeniable, of course, that the degree of working-class self-representational capacity was greatly affected by both hard-core Cold War anti-communist policies and the neoliberal fragmentation of wage laborers into many divergent, sometimes even mutually antagonistic, groups. However, the noteworthy revival of autochthonous socialist politics and ideology in the 1980s, as well as socialist success in entering mainstream electoral politics in the 2000s, reveals the potential of political socialism in South Korea. Moreover, I argue that socialist/Marxist influence on South Korean intellectual paradigms and debates is significantly more pronounced than research suggests. Rather than a failure, socialism in South Korea represents a continuum of struggle. Socialism did not triumph on the Korean Peninsula in the twentieth century. However, the struggle continues, and constitutes perhaps the principally important part of Korea's modern and contemporary history.
Strategies, Struggles, and Sites of Transformation in Korean Political Economy
Journal of Korean Studies, 2019
Korean political economy as a field of study is interdisciplinary in nature, com- prising research by scholars within development studies, heterodox economics, politics, geography, sociology, anthropology, and beyond. By extension, its bound- aries are often disjointed, fuzzy, and overlapping. This situation raises challenges for tracking progress and taking stock of the field in a manner that renders this material coherent for area studies in general and Korean studies in particular. Nonetheless, four recent books provide the rare opportunity to raise a number of salient issues regarding the orientation of this inchoate field for a Korean studies audience. While by no means representative of the broad swath of work that might fall under the category of Korean political economy, these books nonetheless raise a number of important questions about what has been missing in the study of Korea’s political economy, how the field and the phenomenon itself are changing, and where it might go in the future. These are timely questions given recent events such as Korea’s recent Candlelight revolution, which led to the impeachment of Park Geun-hye and the election of a new administration promising to tackle cor- ruption and inequality. Taking stock of the processes that led to these protests, the power of the actors involved in them, and the challenges faced by popular actors who have sought to institutionalize a more egalitarian political economic model in Korea are important concerns for those interested in political and economic trans- formation on the peninsula. In their own way, these books can help deepen ongo- ing scholarship on these issues and more.