Divining and Knowing: Karl Sudhoff's Historical Method (original) (raw)
This article investigates the historical method of Karl Sudhoff (1853– 1938), Germany’s first professor of medical history. It argues that in order to understand his ideas more fully, we need to step outside the historiography of medical history and assess his methodology in relation to the norms and ideals of German academic history writing in general. The article demonstrates that the philology-based “critical method” of Leopold von Ranke (1795–1886) was central to Sudhoff’s methodological thinking. It investigates the underlying philosophi- cal and epistemological assumptions of Ranke’s method, which tend to be less appreciated than his overt empiricism and explores how Sudhoff applied these to the new professionalizing subdiscipline of the history of medicine. The article argues that Sudhoff’s concerns with the methodology of history, which involved a particular conception of the relationship between the human sciences and the medical sciences, offers compelling addresses to our times.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Max Weber, historiography, medical knowledge, and the formation of medicine
2008
This paper applies Max Weber's proposition regarding the differences between the 'sciences' to the 'historicist controversy': the problems emerging from opposing approaches to understanding the past. The historiography in question is the development of the 'biomedical model' of health and disease, and the rise of 'medicine' in the course of 19 th century Europe and Britain. While Weber's theoretical framework does not answer the questions posed by present-day scholars about specific historical events, it enables a critique of the process through which history is 'constructed', and offers an alternative approach to the 'transformation' of 19 th century medicine.
Looking for trouble: medical science and clinical practice in the historiography of modern medicine
The relationship between the pursuit of science and the practice of medicine has been a theme of abiding interest among medical historians. For the past 30 years or so, historians have characterised that relationship largely in terms of divergence, tension and conflict. My contention is that that tension has been over-stated. In this paper, I show how the narrative of conflict came to dominate historians' accounts of science–medicine relations, and suggest some reasons why that narrative, rather than a more mutualistic understanding of science and medicine, enjoys such credibility among historians of medicine.
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science,, 2017
This article reflects on the history of medicine as an academic discipline. It analyzes in particular the debates that took place in France between the second half of the 20 th and the beginning of the 21 st century. The first part recalls the main features of the discussions about the history of medicine since it was identified as an autonomous discipline up to the epistemological turn that, in the middle of the 19 th century, opposed partisans of a " philological and scientific " to partisans of a " heroic " history of medicine. The second part deals with the debates that began in France in the 1960s-1970s over the legitimacy of a history of medicine written by physicians, and the foundation of a history of medicine written by professional historians. The third part proposes a reflection on the future of research and teaching in this field in France, and highlights the need for cooperation between physicians and specialists in the human and social sciences.
Modern German Doctors: A Failure of Professionalization?
Public Health and Medical Care in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Germany
This conference would perhaps not have come into being were it not for the nagging and still inadequately answered questions raised by the Nuremberg Tribunal about the "perversion", as Michael Kater has aptly called it, of German medicine. Perhaps the major question still looming over the history of medicine in twentieth-century Germany was succinctly put in the title of Alexander Mitscherlich's 1947 book on the Nuremberg physicians' trials, Medizin ohne Menschlichkeit, also translated as Doctors of Infamy. i How could a modern medical community with a tradition of classical as well as scientific learning, the descendants of Hippocrates and the collective bearers of scientific professionalism, ignore the admonition in the Hippocratic oath to "maintain the utmost respect for human life from the time of its conception"? ii How could the German medical profession, the peer if not the envy of its colleagues abroad at the outbreak of World War
History and Philosophy of Medicine, 2024
Dietrich von Engelhardt and the history of medicine Dietrich von Engelhardt (1941-) is a German scholar who has devoted his life to research and teaching in the history of medicine and the sciences, literature and medicine, and ethics in medical and scientific research. He studied philosophy, history, and slavistic at the universities of Tübingen, München and Heidelberg and received his doctorate from the last one with a thesis on Hegel and chemistry.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.