Social Entrepreneurship and Performance: The Role of Perceived Barriers and Risk (original) (raw)
Related papers
Predictors of Social Entrepreneurship Success: A Cross-national Analysis of Antecedent Factors
Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2014
ABSTRACT Even though the practice of social entrepreneurship has a long history, the field has only begun to gain academic attention in the past few decades. However, most of the literature to date focuses on theoretical and conceptual issues, and there continues to be a paucity of empirical work in this discipline. Using the number of social entrepreneurs in a country as a proxy for prevalence of the phenomenon is a strong predictor – the validity of the results was confirmed using two reputable databases of social entrepreneurs, i.e., the Ashoka and Schwab Foundations. Furthermore, the components of national-level attitudes for general entrepreneurship, i.e., perceived opportunity, no fear of failing, and aspirations of new technology, were found to be positively correlated with social entrepreneurship at the country level. Yet, national-level attitudes for networking and opportunities for start-ups, generally correlated with general entrepreneurship, were negatively correlated with social entrepreneurship. We also discuss the implications of our findings and discuss their consequences as well as suggestions for future research.
What distinguishes social entrepreneurs from business entrepreneurs? Insights from GEM
2010
Objectives: What sort of people become social entrepreneurs, and in what way do they differ from business entrepreneurs? This question is important for policy because there has been a shift from direct to indirect delivery of many public services, requiring a professional approach to social enterprise. Yet we know little about who sets up social enterprises. Prior work: Much prior work on social entrepreneurs has been based on small and convenience samples, and this is true in the United Kingdom as elsewhere. An exception is work based on annual UK Global Entrepreneurship monitor (GEM) surveys (e.g. Levie et al., 2006). Approach: Defining and distinguishing business from social entrepreneurs is problematic. However, inclusion of items that measured the relative importance of economic, social and environmental goals in the 2009 UK GEM survey enables us to compare business and social entrepreneurs based on two different definitions: activity-based (setting up or running a new business...
Social Entrepreneurship in the Modern Economy: Warm Glow, Cold Feet
This study tests and extends current knowledge on the causes of social entrepreneurship: a type of entrepreneurship that concerns the process of discovering, evaluating, and pursuing opportunities aimed at the creation of social value. In contrast to what is common in this research domain, this study applies a research design based on unique, large-scale and internationally comparable survey data. Various research themes are addressed such as the occurrence and drivers of social entrepreneurship at the macro-level, factors that influence the survival of social ventures at the firm level, and the differences and commonalities between social and commercial entrepreneurs at the individual level. At the macro-level it is concluded that social entrepreneurship clearly is a global phenomenon with a prevailing role for the level of income in a country as one of the drivers of its occurrence. At the micro-level results indicate a deviating entrepreneurial profile for social entrepreneurs th...
The purpose of this research paper is to look on social entrepreneurship and people's perception on social entrepreneurship in the Sultanate of Oman. This study took the perceptions of 100 Omani people, through semi-structured interviews and survey, in Sultanate of Oman on social entrepreneurship. Majority of the survey/interview respondents think that business entrepreneurs are more challenging than social entrepreneurs but the challenges that are the social entrepreneurs facing are very distinctive and it is not that easy for social entrepreneurs to find out a spectrum where we can create social value with profit. The study results show that Omani people rather prefer more innovative social entrepreneurs than normal social entrepreneurs. People presumed that many social enterprises in Oman are with inherent vision of sustainable growth that is environmentally friendly that are well equipped to balance growth with ecological concerns in the country as carbon emissions can be threat in Oman because of the economy's high dependency of oil sector. Besides, the respondents call on the Government's crucial role in the social entrepreurship arena.
SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS: A CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISION
2011
Social entrepreneurship is a subject of growing interest for both academics and governments. However, from the quantitative approach, little is known about the environmental factors that affect this phenomenon. For this reason, the main purpose of the present study is to statistically explore the relationship between environmental factors and social entrepreneurship, as seen through a cross-country comparison and in the light of institutional economics as the conceptual framework. Linear regression analysis is used over a sample of 49 countries to study the impact of formal institutions (public spending, access to finance and governance effectiveness) and informal institutions (social needs, societal attitudes and education) on social entrepreneurial activity. The main findings suggest that, while societal attitudes increase the rates of social entrepreneurship, public spending has a negative relationship with this phenomenon. Contributions of the research are both conceptual, in terms of development in the field of social entrepreneurship from an institutional perspective, and practical, in terms of designing policies to promote social enterprise creation.
Vital to economic growth and inclusion, especially for developing economies, social entrepreneurshipa fast-emerging discipline that generates social impact through an entrepreneurial approach-helps to boost a country's economy, as well as its social fabric. Social enterprises can create jobs, provide innovative services and products, promote sustainability, and give hope for the future. Social entrepreneurship is growing rapidly in size, scope, and support. An unprecedented number of organizations are using it as a strategy to address social problems across emerging markets. Many of these projects are improving people's health, safeguarding the environment, and creating more economic opportunities. It was found pertinent to explore the relationship between drivers and derived benefits of social entrepreneurship. A total of 186 respondents with specific characteristics of social entrepreneurs were selected through purposive sampling. Data was collected through a structured questionnaire. It was found that risk-taking attitudes among social entrepreneurs and growth opportunities for social entrepreneurship impacted inclusive job creation. There was also a significant correlation between the drivers and benefits of social entrepreneurship.
Indicators of the behavior of social entrepreneurs at the individual level
2022
This research aims to identify the indicators of the behavior of social entrepreneurs at an individual level to propose a conceptual framework associated with the subject. It adopted a descriptive and exploratory qualitative-quantitative approach, consulting databases used were the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The research sample consisted ofarticles published between the years 2000 to 2020. It found three main research lines: entrepreneurial social intention, behavioral characteristics, and entrepreneurial social orientation. Among the indicators, the most prominent are: entrepreneurial self-efficacy, social support, previous experience, moral obligation and empathy
Characteristics of Social Entrepreneurs and How to Foster Them
Asian Journal of Business and Management, 2018
The purpose of this study is to find the characteristics that affect social entrepreneurs' level of social contribution, and what should be done to empower social entrepreneurs with the observed characteristics to fulfill the needs of social welfare in Indonesia. In total, 106 valid units-of-research from a survey with a base response number of 5,620, provided by the GEM report of 2015, are analyzed, using a multiple linear regression method to find the characteristics of the social entrepreneurs. Previous literature is used to provide suggestions for practical implication. Based on the Five Social Entrepreneurial Characteristics, it is found that the only characteristic which significantly affects social entrepreneurs' level of social contributions is perseverance. To nurture this attribute, social entrepreneurs could be driven to develop active partnerships with NGOs. Active partnerships would make social entrepreneurs develop not only perseverance, but also become more competent in contributing to social issues. This research is very specific for social entrepreneurs in Indonesia, and points to the possibilities of resorting to social entrepreneurs for fulfilling the demand of social welfare support rather than only depending on the government or NGOs. In addition, instead of encouraging the establishment of more social entrepreneurs, this research aims to foster their potential.
How to Turn Entrepreneurs into Social Entrepreneurs? A Challenge for Developing Countries
Journal of Social Business, No. 2, July 2011, 2011
In developing countries, entrepreneurial skills would play an essential role in the creation of successful social businesses. Because there are no better people than existing entrepreneurs when developing new businesses, we argue that governments and multilateral organisations should rely on them to promote the concept of social business. But, are existing entrepreneurs ready to turn into social entrepreneurs? In this article we analyse the characteristics of entrepreneurs in developing countries, provide insight into their mindset toward social entrepreneurship, and produce policy recommendations that may help persuade them to become social entrepreneurs.
Two Paths Diverged: Examining the Antecedents to Social Entrepreneurship
Management Communication Quarterly, 2014
This research examines the antecedents that motivate and prepare social entrepreneurs to begin social ventures. Drawing from in-depth interviews with 20 social entrepreneurs, this research reveals that there are two paths to social entrepreneurship: the activist path and the business path. Both activist and business social entrepreneurs were motivated by a family legacy or a transformative early adulthood experience as the moral basis for forming a social venture, and both suggested that prior work experience was instrumental in helping them launch their social venture. However, activist social entrepreneurs were likely to form their social venture as a continuation of their ongoing work on a social issue. In contrast, business social entrepreneurs' first activity on a social issue was to form a social venture. This research suggests that these two different paths to social entrepreneurship result in different types of social ventures.