Thailand's contentious referendum spells uncertain political future (original) (raw)
AI-generated Abstract
The 2016 referendum in Thailand, concerning the draft of the country's twentieth constitution, serves as a pivotal test of the military junta's power and legitimacy. The new constitution aims to entrench military control at the expense of democratic processes, and its rejection could significantly diminish the junta's status. Despite promises of returning to democratic elections, actual political stability remains uncertain as the military's dominance persists and public dissent is suppressed.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Thailand four years after the coup: The struggle against the dissenters
After the 2006 coup d'état, there were many unusual incidents in Thailand, some of which involved considerable bloodshed, which originated from clashes between those in power and dissenters. This article examines how political institutions in Thailand are structured, and the author argues that, in order to effectively assess the state of Thai politics after the coup, an analysis of the structures of political legitimacy in the country is essential. The author will be exploring the way in which political legitimacy is generally determined by the established power holders, especially the monarchy and its allies. The ideologies and beliefs of recent dissenters will also be examined in detail.
2015
In this paper, Dr. Prajak argues that the failed 2 February 2014 election produced critical and deep implications for the future of Thailand’s political development. The PDRC was the first social movement in Thailand that mobilized mass support against electoral process and institutions. Their animosity towards the election marked an unprecedented development in the country’s prolonged political conflict. The PDRC’s rejection of the election escalated the deep-seated political conflict to another level from which it will be difficult for the country to recover.
The 2014 Military Coup in Thailand: Implications for Political Conflicts and Resolution
In 2014, the Thai army staged its thirteenth coup claiming to resolve the decade-long political conflict. This article seeks to analyze conflict resolution efforts by Thailand’s incumbent military regime and the way in which these efforts actually affect the trajectory of the conflict. Drawing on the Thai case, I argue that the junta’s conflict resolution efforts aggravate the conditions conducive to conflict entrapment because: (1) military rule closes down a channel for meaningful dialogue among conflict parties; (2) the army’s association with Thailand’s traditional elites implies the continuation of socio-economic inequality underpinning the current crisis; (3) military rule undermines Thailand’s development of democratic institutions needed to overcome the ongoing power struggle; and (4) the junta’s political partisanship is likely to exacerbate social division in Thailand.
The Land of Forced Smiles: Military Rule in Thailand and its Discontents
2016
ince the military coup of 2014, Thais have been living under one of their most repressive regimes in decades. Various junta appointed bodies are currently working in accordance with a 'roadmap' they claim will restore democracy to the country -but what kind of democracy remains to be seen. This discussion paper places the recent coup in a historical context, arguing that it was a way for traditional elites to gain the upper hand in a decades-long struggle against elected politicians. With this in mind, it seems clear that the 'roadmap' and any constitution drafting overseen by the junta and their allies will actually be a way to reduce the power of elected politicians to the detriment of Thai democracy. The paper then turns its attention to those who opposed the coup, asking to what extent opposition to the junta has been possible in Thailand and what conditions might lead to a mass mobilisation against it.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.