Fair Use in The Netherlands - A Renaissance? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Exceptions and Limitations in European Union Copyright Law
2012
Most countries, including all those in the EU, provide for exceptions and limitations to copyright by exhaustively listing and defining in their copyright laws all such permitted exceptions and limitations. The United States has been an exception in this respect, having instead a so called ‘fair use’ approach which provides four parameters for its courts to apply. Some EU Member States, unhappy at the inflexibility of their respective approaches to this issue are now starting to explore to what extent they can move towards a ‘fair use’ approach. This article considers why this issue has become a particular problem in the EU, what sort of scope EU Member States have to amend their national laws in such circumstances, and where further flexibilities might develop in the case law as a result of the courts applying principles from outside copyright law, notably on the basis of fundamental human rights.
Bridging the Differences between Copyright's Legal Traditions – The Emerging EC Fair Use Doctrine
2010
In the current online environment, more flexibility in the field of copyright limitations is a legislative necessity rather than a mere regulatory option. From a social and cultural perspective, the Web 2.0, with its advanced search engine services, interactive platforms and various forms of user-generated content, is central to the promotion and enhancement of freedom of expression and information. From an economic perspective, it creates a parallel universe of traditional content providers relying on copyright protection, and emerging Internet industries whose further development depends on robust copyright limitations. In particular, the newcomers in the online market -social networking sites, video forums and virtual worlds -promise a remarkable potential for economic growth that have already attracted the attention of the OECD. 1
A Wave of Fresh Air in Copyright Regulation
2013
Loreto Corredoira, Professor of Communication Law at Complutense University of Madrid, shares some initial observations from a wider research project[1] looking at the evolution of legal and political IP regimes at both international and national levels. She argues that there is potential for European countries to adopt new approaches to protect content industries, focusing more on user rights, fair use and personal freedoms.
Remix prohibited: how rigid EU copyright laws inhibit creativity
2015
With the emergence of the digital environment, the issue of “transformative uses” in copyright law has gained renewed interest in legal literature. While many authors emphasized the challenge that these transformative practices constituted for copyright law, there has been a clear lack of comprehensive study of the extent of copyright law's (in)hospitality to such practices. In addition, too little attention has been paid to possible solutions to resolve this conflict inside the copyright regime. This paper aims to contribute to fill these two gaps. In this first paper, we will provide a comprehensive assessment of the status transformative uses in EU, Belgian and French law, informed by a vast body of case law. In a second paper, we will discuss potential solutions drawing inspiration from Canadian copyright law, which has recently experienced both the introduction of a legal exception for user generated content, and a court-led shift from a traditional closed-list fair dealing system to a broader, semi-open system of exceptions and limitations..
The Restricted Acts of Reproduction and Distribution in EU Copyright Law
2015
Most, but not all, types of act restricted by copyright or related rights in works or other matter are harmonised at an EU level. Thus, along with the restricted act of communication to and making available to the public, the restricted acts of reproduction, distribution and rental are also expressly harmonised at an EU level. Although such other restricted acts have occasioned considerably less case law in the Court of Justice of the EU than the restricted act of communication and making it available to the public, their case law provides an insight into many live issues of EU copyright law, such as the degree of originality required for copyright to subsist and the scope of the doctrine of exhaustion of rights. In some areas, such as originality, the Court has been prepared to extend the ambit of the EU harmonising legislation into areas which the legislature did not purport to harmonise; but there have been others where it has not been prepared so to do, thereby flagging up lacun...
EU Copyright law, an ancient history, a contemporary challenge, 2022
in past evolutions. In the process of establishing modern copyright law, the influence of technological changes appears to be an intrinsic element of the regulation of copyright law. Indeed, rather than being external to copyright law, technology forms an integral part of the very fabric of law. 1 A dialectic relationship between copyright law and technology is generally accepted. Technology poses new challenges to copyright
The Future of Copyright Protection in the European Union
2013
National laws within the EU as to copyright and related rights have been extensively harmonised over time. One of the main drivers for this harmonisation has been the aim of establishing a single European market in goods and services. But harmonisation alone can only achieve so much, and its limits are now being experienced. This article discusses the degree to which harmonisation alone has not been able to achieve a single market in products and services that are the subject of copyright and related rights, and what further legislative responses could seek to address this.