Country Environmental Legal Framework - Russian Federation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Critical Policy Analysis - Russian State Programme: Environmental Protection 2012-2020
University of Glasgow, 2019
Environmental issues have been a concern for many nations as it is threatening human life through climate change, earth pollution and natural resource scarcity. As the largest country in the world, it is believed that the Russian Federation has an important role in protecting the environment globally as it has a vast area of ‘carbon sink’ forest. However, Russia is also contributing to be a major emitter of greenhouse gases and a leading global supplier of fossil fuels (Korppoo, et al., 2015: 25). Thus, it is interesting to discuss the Russian policy on climate change. “Environmental Protection 2012-2020” that was signed and approved on 27th December 2012 was Russian policy as the continuation of Climate Doctrine of Russian Federation 2009. It consists of 5 sub-programmes, aiming to improve environmental safety and to preserve natural systems. Although the Russian government has facilitated some research and industry to support sustainable development, the actions are not enough to protect the environment in Russia. This paper seeks to analyse Russian policy towards climate change through the fifth sub-programme of Environmental Protection policy, which is about the facilitating implementation of the programme.
Environmental Issues in Russia
Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2008
This review examines the literature available on the state of the envi- ronment and environmental protection in the Russian Federation. As the largest country on Earth, rich in natural resources and biodiver- sity, Russia's problems and policies have global consequences. Environ- mental quality and management are influenced by the legacy of Soviet economic planning and authoritarian governance, as well as
Environmental Policies in Russia: Problems of State Funding and Implementation
2023
Russia has entered the contours of the modern global ecosystem in sustainable finance and responsible investment practices. Its national projects are complex and ensure a balance of all three components of sustainable development: economic, social and environmental factors. In 2019, the active formation of the green finance market took place in Russia. The green economy was officially proclaimed by the federal government and industry experts. Target programmes for environmental protection were adopted at the national and regional levels, taking into account the ecological specifics of the regions. However, the Russian economy is highly dependent on the extraction of mineral resources and hydrocarbons (e.g., oil and gas). This chapter investigates the Russian federal government's policies to resolve the ongoing environmental issues in the country, including a critical evaluation of various state programmes, the effectiveness of their implementation and an examination of legislation and macro statistics. The following conclusions are made. The national strategy for financing sustainable development has an unclear structure with incomplete coverage and an unsystematic approach. Hence, the transition to the model of green economic growth is questionable. The definition of a green economy is not adequately formed; thus, it is challenging for the government and businesses to measure, manage and regulate it. As a result, it complicates the formation of financing mechanisms for green investments. This is also constrained by the lack of general agreement on which sectors of the national economy are recognised as negatively affecting the environment.
European Environment, 2002
This paper provides an overview of developments relating to Russia's environmental policy and environmental legislation since the break-up of the Soviet Union. It also highlights general trends evident within the country's environmental movement. All three areas have been characterized by significant change during the last decade.The paper suggests that the effectiveness of environmental policy and legislative change has been undermined by a combination of administrative, financial and operational constraints. These ensure that key policies struggle to extend beyond official rhetoric, a situation similar to that found during the Soviet period. Developments in Russia's environmental policy, particularly since the mid–late 1990s, appear to indicate the emergence of a more utilitarian approach towards the use of natural resources culminating in the removal of the State Committee for the Protection of the Environment during 2000. Russia's environmental movement has been assertive in attempting to keep the environment on the policy agenda in recent years. This is reflected in its efforts to carry out a national referendum during 2000. Nevertheless, its overall influence is limited by a combination of public apathy and political opposition.In view of Russia's potential to influence the European and global environment, the paper concludes by indicating the need for international assistance and co-operation in order to address the noted policy and legislative weaknesses. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Environmental Management in the Russian Federation: A Next Generation Enigma
2002
Environmental managers in Russia face severe problems, both from Soviet-era and continuing environmental degradation and due to the weakness of current institutions with responsibilities for environmental protection. This paper draws on surveys, a case study of water pollution, and workshops on Russian environmental decision-making to explore prospects for environmental improvements. Using concepts from the regulatory reform literature on next-generation environmental policies, it focuses on the use of market incentives, the construction of a civil society, and community involvement, and emphasizes that Russian nongovernmental organizations may have a particularly important role to play in improving environmental management. Solidifying their legal base, coalition-building skills, and capability to conduct independent, pragmatic policy analyses would enhance their contribution.
Environmental Legislation of Russia and China: Common and Peculiar Features
The article presents a comparative legal analysis of the environmental legislations of Russia and China. As a result, common and peculiar legislative approaches of the two countries towards legal regulation of environmental protection are revealed. The main lines of comparison are associated with terminology issues, environmental protection procedures, presence of environmental requirements in certain fields of activities, securing of environmental rights of the citizens, contents of the certain norms of protection of natural resources. The most successful regulatory solutions of the environmental problems in the environmental legislations of China and Russia are suggested for the parliamentarians of the both countries to enhance the national environmental legislations. The obtained results could be used in further scientific research in the field of comparative environmental legal science as a new area of scientific investigations in various countries of the world. In order to achieve the set goals, the authors widely applied the system analysis method and the method of comparative legal research.
Prospects for ecological modernization in Russia: Analysis of the policy environment
Demokratizatsiya - The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization
This article assesses the prospects for ecological modernization in Russia by scrutinizing the policy environment which conditions the structuration of environmental policy. Recently introduced state environmental policy principles for the period up to 2030, which the Russian government states to be the main goal for the country's ecological modernization, form the starting point of this analysis. The main aim of the article is to shed light on the factors that enable or constrain the implementation of these principles and ecological modernization in general. The article concludes that while institutional improvement is taking place, other dimensions of the policy environment are less favorable for ecological modernization. Thus, the outcome we see so far resembles a weak version of ecological modernization, which emphasizes technological solutions and the development of governance structures as a core change. The strong version, necessitating change in cultural-discursive patterns and social institutions, is not likely to take place in the near future.