A life of their own: preaching, radicalisation, and the early ps-Chrysostomica in Greek and Latin (original) (raw)

The Audience and Readership of Late Antique Homilies (Chapter 1 of Preaching Christology in the Roman Near East) (Full Text)

This chapter offers a new approach to the audience of late antique homilies and reconstructs the process by which they went from spoken word to circulating text. Recent studies have exposed the potential of sermons as sources for social history by focusing on the setting in which preachers delivered their sermons. Yet most sermons from late antiquity—and especially Syriac metrical homilies—do not offer such information. This chapter reframes the question of the audience of late antique sermons to include both the individuals gathered physically before the preacher and the communities that read the homilies after delivery. A summary of the evidence for the setting of delivery reveals the challenge of working with certain homilies. But practices associated with the transmission of homilies—delivering, recording, redacting, collecting, and circulating—help reconstruct the types of individuals who formed the readership of late antique homilies. Philip Michael Forness, Preaching Christology in the Roman Near East: A Study of Jacob of Serugh, Oxford Early Christian Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).

Oksana Nika. Ancient Greek Philosophers and Preaching Discourse Practices of Early Modern Age. Logos. A Journal of Religion, Philosophy, Comparative Cultural Studies and Art. 2022. Issue No. 111. Рр. 66-75. https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2022.28.

Logos. A Journal of Religion, Philosophy, Comparative Cultural Studies and Art. 2022. Issue No. 111. Рр. 66-75. https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2022.28., 2022

The article analyses the intertext of ancient Greek philosophers in the discursive practices of early modern preaching of the 17th century. It has been found that preachers usually did not leave references to the works they were referring to, because the works were familiar to them and could easily be recalled from memory. Thus, the use of "other people's words" had the character of quotation, retelling, or allusion. The article defines the range of these philosophers, compares the textual fragments in translations, reveals changes in Ruthenian expression and semantic expansion of these examples for moral guidance in preaching interpretations. It was found out that preachers often focused on Latin translations of Greek authors, which were popular in the intellectual environment of the scribes of the 17th century. The use of exempla from the works of ancient Greek philosophers in sermons on Sundays and holidays, as well as in funeral and military sermons is characterized, the discursive practices of Antonii Radyvylovskyi and Yoanykii Galiatovskyi are compared. Key Words: preaching discourse practices, intertext, ancient Greek philosophers

Review of Rhetoric and Religious Identity Richard Flower and Morwena Ludow Rivista ARYS

REVISTA ARYS. Antigüedad: Religiones y Sociedades, 2022

Rhetoric and Religious Identity in Late Antiquity presents a collection of essays that seeks a deeper understanding of the reciprocal formation of rhetoric and identity in "the long 4 th century", from the period of the Tetrarchy to the Theodosians, except for one contribution, within the Roman Empire. Its goal is to "enrich our understanding of the expression of late anti-antique religious identity" and to explore ways in which "religious identity was ascribed, constructed, and contested" to furnish FLOWER, RICHARD & LUDLOW, MORWENNA (eds.) (2020). Rhetoric and Religious Identity in Late Antiquity.

Beyond Religion: Homilies as Conveyor of Political Ideology in Middle Byzantium

Y. Stouraitis (ed.), Identities and Ideologies in the Medieval East Roman World, 2022

The paper focusses on a specific group of religious literary texts, namely homilies, in order to investigate whether they transmitted political ideology. In particular, it deals with Middle Byzantine homilies from just before the beginning of Iconoclasm to 1204. This is not an exhaustive study of such a vast subject, but an examination of certain aspects of it. Following some preliminary remarks, the issues under consideration are: 1. The expression of criticism of or opposition to the emperor, whether explicit or ex silentio; 2. The positive expression of political, more specifically imperial ideology on the basis of a few significant homiletic examples from the Byzantine capital at the highest level of church and state; 3. Homilies in the Byzantine tradition as a medium of political-ideological correctness outside of the empire (the case of Philagathos Kerameus); and 4. The analysis of a homily that bridges the two worlds, the Byzantine and the Norman, in another way, by presenting Norman political ideology from the point of view of a Byzantine preacher.

The Authenticity and Historicity of the Chrysostomian Homily CPG 4333.2

Post-Augustum, 2021

The paper discusses the authenticity and historicity of the second Chrysostomian homily on Penitence (CPG 4333.2), according to criteria set forward in the framework of Chrysostomian studies, i.e. the language of the sermon and its doctrinal aspects. It shows that CPG4333.2 may indeed be identified as an authentic work of John Chrysostom, but challenges its traditional attribution to the Antiochian period of John. This study proposes that the second homily on Penitence belongs to John‟s Constantinopolitan period, because its historicity is best understood against the events, the court machinations, and the personal relationships that led to John Chrysostom‟s final exile and death. Pivotal elements in this new reading of CPG4333.2 are the recasting of the histories in Arcadius court according to the biblical paradigms used in the sermon, i.e. the Empress Eudoxia as Jezebel and the eunuch Eutropius as David; and above all, of John himself as the preacher par excellence, conscience of the mighty and moral controller of the Empire.

The Irreligious Formula ὁ τῆς Ἑλλάδος ἀλιτήριος and its Codification as Antidemosthenic Propaganda

Fortunatae, 2023

This paper examines the function of the irreligious formula ὁ τῆς Ἑλλάδος ἀλιτήριος («cursed offender of Greece»), known only in the speeches of Aeschines (Against Ctesiphon) and Dinarchus (Against Demosthenes). Both authors conceptualise this vehement criticism of Demosthenes, seeking to condemn the consequences of his entire public career. We will attempt to define the semantic scope of this formula, taking into account the historical-political context in which these speeches were composed. Furthermore, we will verify its deep link with several rhetorical and stylistic devices.