Ethnobotany: The Study of People-Plant Relationships (original) (raw)

Abstract

sparkles

AI

This paper explores ethnobotany, emphasizing its interdisciplinary nature and relevance across diverse fields such as anthropology, ecology, and pharmacognosy. The study outlines various topics within ethnobotany, including paleoethnobotany, medical ethnobotany, cognitive ethnobotany, and issues surrounding intellectual property rights. By understanding the complex relationships between people and plants, this research highlights the importance of traditional ecological knowledge and the role of ethnobotany in conservation and sustainable practices.

Key takeaways

sparkles

AI

  1. Ethnobotany integrates various disciplines, enhancing understanding of human-plant relationships and cultural diversity.
  2. The field has evolved from simplistic classifications to a more nuanced understanding of cultural ecology.
  3. Ethnobotanists employ diverse methods, including participant observation and statistical analysis, to gather and analyze data.
  4. Collaborative research with Indigenous communities emphasizes ethical practices and respects traditional ecological knowledge (TEK).
  5. Ethnobotany addresses contemporary issues, such as biodiversity conservation and sustainable resource management, through interdisciplinary approaches.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (92)

  1. ALCORN J. Huastec Mayan ethnobotany. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press; 1994.
  2. ALCORN J. Ethnobotanical knowledge systems: a resource for meeting rural development goals. In: WARREN DM, SLIKKERVEER LJ, BROKENSHA D, editors. The cultural dimension of development: Indigenous knowledge sys- tems. London: Intermediate Technology Publications; 1995.
  3. ALEXIADES M, LAIRD S. Laying the foundation: equitable biodiversity research relationships. In: LAIRD S, editor. Biodiversity and traditional knowledge: equitable partner- ships in practice. London, UK: Earthscan; 2002. p 3-15.
  4. ANDERSON MK. Native Californians as ancient and contem- porary cultivators. In: BLACKBURN TC, ANDERSON MK, edi- tors. Before the wilderness. Environmental management by Native Californians. Menlo Park (CA): Ballena Press; 1993a. p 151-174.
  5. ANDERSON MK. California Indian horticulture: management and use of redbud by the Southern Sierra Miwok. J Ethnobiol 1993b;11(1):145-157.
  6. ANDERSON EN. Ecologies of the heart: emotion, belief, and the environment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
  7. ANDERSON EN. Maya knowledge and "science wars". J Ethnobiol 2000;20:129-158.
  8. ANDERSON EN. Comments. In: FORD R, editor. Ethnobiology at the millennium: past promise and future prospects. Ann Arbor (MI): Museum of Anthropology; 2001. p 175 -186.
  9. ANDERSON EN. Everyone eats: understanding food and cul- ture. New York: New York University Press; 2005a.
  10. ANDERSON MK. Tending the wild: native American knowl- edge and the management of California's natural resources. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005b.
  11. ATRAN S, MEDIN D, ROSS N. Evolution and devolution of knowledge: a tale of two biologies. J Roy Anthrop Inst 2004;10(2):395-420.
  12. BALE ´E W. Advances in historical ecology. Historical Ecology Series. New York: Columbia University Press; 1998.
  13. BALICK M. Ethnobotany: linking health and environmental conservation. In: CHESWORTH, J, editor. The ecology of health: identifying issues and alternatives. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1996. p 201-209.
  14. BEATTIE O, APLAND B, BLAKE EW, COSGROVE JA, GAUNT S, GREER S, MACKIE AP, MACKIE K, STRAATHOF D, THORP V, TROFFE PM. The Kwa ¨da ¯y Da ¨n Ts'ı `nchi discovery from a glacier in British Columbia. J Can d'Arche ´ol 2000; 24:129-147.
  15. BERLIN B. Speculations of the growth of ethnobotanical nomenclature. Lang Soc 1972;1:51-86.
  16. BERLIN B. Ethnobiological classification: principles of categ- orization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton (MA): Princeton University Press; 1992.
  17. BERLIN B, BREEDLOVE DE, RAVEN PH. Folk taxonomies and biological classification. Science 1966;154: 275.
  18. BOSTER JS. Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: evidence from Aguaruna cultivars of Manihot esculenta. Econ Bot 1985;39(3):310-325.
  19. BROWN CH. Language and living things: uniformities in folk classification and naming. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press; 1984.
  20. BRUSH SB. Whose knowledge, whose genes, whose rights? In: BRUSH B, STABINSKY D, editors. Valuing local knowl- edge: Indigenous people and intellectual property rights. Washington (DC): Island Press; 1996. p 1-24.
  21. BRUSH SB. Cultural research on the origin and maintenance of agricultural diversity. In: SANGA G, ORTALLI G, editors. Nature knowledge: ethnoscience, cognition, and utility. New York: Berghahn Books; 2004. p 379-385.
  22. CAMPBELL BC. Developing dependence, encountering resist- ance, and the historical ethnoecology of farming in the Missouri Ozarks [PhD Dissertation]. Athens (GA): Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia; 2005.
  23. CARLSON T, MAFFI L, editors. Ethnobotany and conservation of biocultural diversity. Advances in economic botany. Volume 15. New York: Botanical Garden Press; 2004.
  24. CASAGRANDE D. Conceptions of primary forest in a Tzeltal Maya community: implications for conservation. Hum Organ 2004;62(2):189 -202.
  25. CONKLIN H. The relation of Hanuno ´o culture to the plant world [PhD Dissertation]. New Haven (CT): Yale University; 1954.
  26. COX PA, BANACK SA, MURCH SJ. Biomagnification of cyanobacterial neurotoxins and neurodegenerative disease among the Chamorro people of Guam. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2003;100(23):13380-13383.
  27. CUNNINGHAM A. Applied ethnobotany: people, wild plant use and conservation. London: Earthscan; 2001.
  28. DAVIS W. One river: science, adventure and hallucinogenics in the Amazon Basin. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1997.
  29. DAVIS W. Light at the edge of the world: a journey through the realm of vanishing cultures. Vancouver (BC) and Washington (DC): Douglas & McIntyre Press, and National Geographic Society; 2001.
  30. DEUR D, TURNER NJ, editors. Keeping it living: traditions of plant use and cultivation on the Northwest coast of North America. Seattle (WA) and Vancouver (BC): University of Washington Press, and UBC Press; 2005.
  31. DICKSON JH, OEGGL K, HANDLEY L. The Iceman reconsidered. Sci Am 2003;288(5):70-79.
  32. DICKSON JH, RICHARDS MP, HEBDA RJ, MUDIE PJ, BEATTIE O, RAMSAY S, TURNER N, LEIGHTON BJ, WEBSTER JM, HOBISCHAK NR, ANDERSON GS, TROFFE PM, WIGEN RJ. Kwa ¨day Da ¨n Ts'ı ˆnchı ´, the first ancient body of a man from a North American glacier: reconstructing his last days by intestinal and biomolecular analyses. Holocene 2004;14(4):481-486.
  33. DOUGHERTY J. Salience and relativity in classification. Am Ethnol 1978;5(1):66-80.
  34. ELLEN R, editor. Ethnobiology and the science of humankind. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing.
  35. ERTUG F, editor. Ethnobotany: at the junction of the continents and disciplines. Conference proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Ethnobotany (ICEB 2005). Istanbul, Turkey: Yeditepe University, Yayinlari; 2006.
  36. ESTABROOK G. Maintenance of soil fertility in a traditional Portuguese agricultural system. J Ethnobiol 1998; 18(1):15-38.
  37. ETKIN NL. Ethnopharmacology: biological and behavioral perspectives in the study of Indigenous medicines. In: JOHNSON TM, SARGENT CF, editors. Medical anthropology: contemporary theory and method. New York: Praeger; 1990. p 149 -158.
  38. ETKIN NL. Anthropological methods in ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 1993;38:93 -104.
  39. ETKIN NL. Edible medicines: an ethnopharmacology of food. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 2006.
  40. FORD RI. Prehistoric food production in North America. Anthropological Papers 75. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan: 1985.
  41. FORD RI, editor. The nature and status of ethnobotany. Anthropological Papers 67. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan; 1994 (revised from 1978).
  42. FRITZ GJ. Paleoethnobotanical methods and applications. In: MASCHNER HDG, CHIPPINDALE C, editors. Handbook of archaeological methods. Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira Press; 2005. p 771-832.
  43. HARSHBERGER JW. The purposes of ethnobotany. Bot Gaz 1896;21:146-154.
  44. HOWARD P, editor. Women and plants: case studies on gender relations in local plant genetic resource management. London: Zed Books; 2003.
  45. HUNN ES. The utilitarian factor in folk biological classifi- cation. Amer Anthropol 1982;84(4):830-847.
  46. HUNN ES. Nch'i-Wana: "The Big River". Mid-Columbia Indians and their land. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 1990.
  47. INGOLD T. Two reflections on ecological knowledge. In: SANGA G, ORTALLI G, editors. Nature knowledge: eth- noscience, cognition, and utility. New York: Berghahn Books; 2004. p 301-311.
  48. JAIN SK. Bibliography of Indian ethnobotany. India: Scientific Publishers; 2002.
  49. JERNIGAN K. An ethnobotanical investigation of tree identifi- cation by the Aguaruna Jivaro of the Peruvian Amazon. J Ethnobiol 2006;26(1):107-125.
  50. JOHNS T. The origins of human diet and medicine. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1996.
  51. LEPOFSKY D, HEYERDAHL EK, LERTZMAN K, SCHAEPE K, MIERENDORF B. Historical meadow dynamics in southwest British Columbia: a multidisciplinary analysis. Conserv Ecol 2003;7(3):5.
  52. MAFFI L. Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annu Rev Anthropol 2005;29:599-617.
  53. MARTIN GJ. Ethnobotany: a methods manual. London: Chapman and Hall; 1995.
  54. MINNIS PE. Famine foods of the northern American desert borderlands in historical context. J Ethnobiol 1991;11(2):231-256.
  55. MINNIS PE, editor. Ethnobotany: a reader. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 2000.
  56. MINNIS PE, ELISENS W, editors. Biodiversity and Native North America. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 2000.
  57. MITHEN S. Ethnobiology and THE EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN MIND. In: ELLEN R, editor. Ethnobiology and the science of humankind. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishers; 2006. p 45-61.
  58. MOERMAN D. Symbols and selectivity: a statistical analysis of Native American medical ethnobotany. J Ethnopharmacol 1979;1(2):111-119.
  59. MOERMAN D. The medicinal flora of Native North America: an analysis. J Ethnopharmacol 1991;31(1):1 -42.
  60. MOERMAN D. An analysis of the food plants and drug plants of Native North America. J Ethnopharmacol 1996; 52(1):1-22.
  61. MORAN K, KING SR, CARLSON TJ. Biodiversity prospecting: lessons and prospects. Annu Rev Anthropol 2001; 30:505-526.
  62. MUDIE PJ, GREER S, BRAKEL J, DICKSON JH, SCHINKEL C, PETERSON-WELSH R, STEVENS M, TURNER NJ, SHADOW M, WASHINGTON R. Forensic palynology and ethnobotany of Salicornia species (Chenopodiaceae) in northwest Canada and Alaska. Can J Bot 2005;83(1):111-123.
  63. NABHAN GP. Enduring seeds: Native American agriculture and wild plant conservation. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1989.
  64. NABHAN GP. Coming home to eat: the pleasures and politics of local foods. New York: W.W. Norton; 2002.
  65. NAZAREA V. Cultural memory and biodiversity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1998.
  66. Nazarea V, editor. Ethnoecology. Situated knowledge/ located lives. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1999.
  67. NOLAN JM. The roots of tradition: social ecology, cultural geography, and medicinal plant knowledge in the Ozark-Ouachita Highlands. J Ethnobiol 1998;18(2): 249-269.
  68. NOLAN JM. Wild plant classification in Little Dixie: variation in a regional culture. J Ecol Anthropol 2002;6(1):69-81.
  69. NOLAN JM. Wild harvest in the heartland: ethnobotany in Missouri's Little Dixie. Lanham (MD): Rowman and Littlefield; 2007.
  70. NOLAN JM, ROBBINS MC. Cultural conservation of medicinal plants in the Ozarks. Hum Organ 1999;58(1):67-72.
  71. PEACOCK S. "Putting down roots": root food production in the Canadian Plateau [interdisciplinary PhD dissertation].
  72. PEARSALL DM. Paleoethnobotany: a handbook of procedures. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2001.
  73. PIERONI A, PRICE LL, editors. Eating and healing: traditional food as medicine. Binghamton (NY): Haworth Press; 2006.
  74. PIERONI A, VANDEBROEK I, editors. Traveling cultures and plants: the ethnobiology and ethnopharmacy of human migrations. New York: Berghahn Books; 2007.
  75. PLOTKIN MJ. Tales of a Shaman's apprentice: an ethnobotanist searches for new medicines in the Amazon Rain Forest. New York: Penguin; 1993.
  76. PRANCE GT, BALE ´E W, BOOM BM, CARNEIRO RL. Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conserv Biol 1987;1:296 -310.
  77. QUAVE C, PIERONI A. Traditional health care and food and medicinal plant use among historic Albanian migrants and Italians in Lucania, Southern Italy. In: PIERONI A, VANDEBROEK I, editors. Traveling cultures and plants: the ethnobiology and ethnopharmacy of human migrations. New York: Berghahn Books; 2007. p 204 -226.
  78. QUINLAN M. From the bush: the front line of health care in a Caribbean village. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth Publishing; 2004.
  79. QUINLAN M, QUINLAN RJ, NOLAN JM. Ethnophysiology and the herbal treatments of intestinal worms in Dominica, West Indies. J Ethnopharmacol 2002;80:75-83.
  80. RAMI ´REZ-SOSA CR. Quantitative ethnobotany in El Salvador, Central America: a model to study ethnobotanical knowl- edge dynamics. Proceedings of the IVth International Congress of Ethnobotany (ICEB 2005), 2006, 557-564. 2006.
  81. REA A. At the desert's green edge: an ethnobotany of the Gila River Pima. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1997.
  82. SALMO ´N E. Kincentric ecology: Indigenous perceptions of the human-nature relationship. Ecol Appl 2000;10(5):1327-1332.
  83. SANGA G, ORTALLI G, editors. Nature knowledge: eth- noscience, cognition, and utility. New York: Berghahn Books; 2004.
  84. SCHULTES RE, HOFMANN A. Plants of the gods: origins of hal- lucinogenic use. New York: Van der Marck Editions; 1987.
  85. SHIPMAN AS, BOSTER JS. Recall, similarity judgment, and identification of trees: a comparison of experts and novices. Ethos 2008;36(2):171 -192.
  86. STEPP JR. The role of weeds as sources of pharmaceuticals. J Ethnopharmacol 2004;92:163-166.
  87. STEPP JR. Advancements in ethnobiological field methods. Field Meth 2005;17(3):211-218.
  88. STEPP JR, MOERMAN DE. The importance of weeds in ethno- pharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 2001;75:21-31.
  89. STEPP JR, CASTANEDA H, CERVONE S. Mountains and biocul- tural diversity. Mt Res Dev 2005;23(3):223-227.
  90. THOMAS E, VANDERBROEK I, DAMME PV. What works in the field? A comparison of different interviewing methods in ethnobotany with special reference to the use of photo- graphs. Econ Bot 2007;61(4):376-384.
  91. THOMPSON JC (EDOSDI). Gitga'at Plant Project: the interge- nerational transmission of Gitga'at plant knowledge and wisdom using school science curricula [unpublished Master's thesis]. Victoria (BC): School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria; 2004.
  92. TICKTIN T, NANTEL P, RAMI ´REZ F, JOHNS T. Effects of variation on harvest limits for nontimber forest species in Mexico. Conserv Biol 2002;16(3):691-705.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What key insights emerged from studying cultural plant knowledge globally?add

The study highlights a strong correlation between biological and cultural diversity, indicating that regions rich in cultural practices also exhibit high biodiversity, as noted in analyses by Wade and others.

How have contemporary methodologies evolved in ethnobotanical research?add

Recent methods emphasize participant observation and community collaboration, enhancing insights into local ecological knowledge and intra-cultural plant usage, as demonstrated by fieldwork approaches by emerging researchers.

What historical contributions did John W. Harshberger make to ethnobotany?add

Harshberger proposed the field of ethnobotany in 1896, emphasizing the cultural significance of plant use, which laid the groundwork for future explorations into people's relationships with plants.

How does Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) influence modern conservation strategies?add

TEK has become integral to conservation efforts, ensuring that indigenous practices are recognized and utilized in sustainability initiatives, particularly following the Brundtland Commission's emphasis on local knowledge systems in 1987.

What role does medical ethnobotany play in understanding plant toxins?add

Research by Cox on cycad toxicity in Guam identified dangerous compounds impacting health, demonstrating how ethnobotany contributes to identifying ecological risks linked to indigenous food sources.