Reinventing revolutions: an 'other' politics in practise and theory (original) (raw)
Related papers
Towards an Insurrectionary Power/Knowledge: Movement-Relevance, Anti-Oppression, Prefiguration
Despite ongoing efforts to articulate radical methods and theoretical frameworks for social movement research, the field remains embedded in exploitative, oppressive, and hierarchical modes of knowledge production. Following Foucault, I argue that this is because societies like ours, founded through racial and patriarchal violence, are invested in a regime of truth supportive of that violence. In light of this, I argue that social movements scholars need to adopt a radically different form of knowledge practice. Building on anarchist, anti-racist feminist, and anti-colonial scholarship, this paper begins by analysing how liberalism constrains social justice organizing and how academic norms foreclose accountable social movements scholarship. I then introduce three unique ethics emerging in resistance to this situation: movement-relevant, anti-oppressive, and prefigurative. The first confronts the extractive imperatives of enlightenment truth-making; the second resists its neutral and disinterested tendencies; and the third models a rejection of its hierarchical and exclusive mode of authority. I argue that together they provide scholars with a strategy for re-/orienting their research towards what Foucault theorizes as an insurrection of knowledges. These three ethical frameworks combine to facilitate an insurrectionary power/knowledge that fosters collective struggle as it progressively dismantles the regime of truth underlying social movements research.
1 The Radical Subject and Its Critical Theory: An Introduction -Ana edited book_women_2016.pdf
Dinerstein argues that a new radical subject that is unrecognisable with old analytical tools is in the making. This radical subject is plural, prefigurative, decolonial, ethical, ecological, communal and democratic. A critical theory should demonstrate those qualities, too. She reflects on the shortcomings of theory in understanding these changes by arguing against the resistance of social scientists, most of them critical theorists, to learn about this radical subject and to interrogate concepts, methodologies and epistemolo- gies used to grasp radical change. Unlike both a social science obsessed with facticity and policy, and a critical theory obsessed with negative praxis, the new radical theory explored in this book seeks to critique capital-coloniality by means of the affirmation of life. Affirmation is not positive thinking or affirmationism. It is a form of theorising that, driven by ‘hope’, ventures beyond the given offering epistemological, theoretical and empirical openings that reflect a prefigurative and ‘experiential critique’ that is already taking place at the grass roots. The chapter also presents the work of the contributors to the book and the process of theorising without parachutes. Keywords: Radical subject Critical theory Possibility Affirmation Experiential critique Venturing beyond Hope Theorising
Domination and Emancipation, 2021
This article elucidates the reasons behind the retreat from Marxism in contemporary critical theory, and it offers an account of the revolutionary theory that is born of emancipatory struggles as an antidote to this retreat. It begins by briefly elucidating the explanatory power and transformative force of revolutionary theory, as it has been developed in the Marxist tradition, in order to shake it lose from the straw-person depictions, gormless mantras, anti-communist dogmas, historical tommyrot, and vulgarly reductive accounts that petty-bourgeois intellectuals and many others have used to try and discredit it. After clarifying how historical materialism is a collectively produced, transdisciplinary, systemic, radical and fallibilistic science of history rooted in collective struggle, it deploys this framework of analysis to develop a counter-history of critical theory. In this sense, the critique of the Frankfurt School that it advances is not simply an internal or immanent critique but is rather a materialist analysis of its social and historical function in the international political economy of ideas. As the article demonstrates, the type of research promoted under the label ‘critical’ by the global theory industry—which is driven by capitalist interests and policed by their hegemonic enforcers—is work whose critical appearance belies a conformist core.
A Methodological Turn Long Overdue: Or, why it is time for critical scholars to cut their losses
Perspectivism, the idea that knowledge is always only a perspective on world politics, never a fully objective account of it, is perhaps the main foundation behind the emergence of critical approaches in the 1980s and 1990s. As a first step, this idea became a tool to highlight how mainstream approaches concealed class, patriarchal, or colonial interests, and more generally worldviews under the pretense of universal claims. Yet critical scholars rarely took the second step of working out the reflexive implications of perspectivism for the way they carry out their own work. Usually employed as a relativizing device, a means to celebrate diversity (Weldon 2006; Levine 2012), the perspectival nature of knowledge was never taken to place its own methodological demands on critical scholars. This chapter argues that the future of the discipline, or at least of its critical approaches, should be cast in the font of a methodological turn. I contend that it is time for critical scholars to move beyond their long infatuation with ontology in order to reflect concretely on the demands that perspectivism places on critical scholarship. For the challenge of critique does not consists in open promises to recognize complexity, but in the sober recognition that doing so forces us to make more difficult decisions as to what should be left out. In that respect, I will argue that the difficult part is not to open up doors, but rather to decide on which door to close.
Weaving threads that gesture beyond modern-colonial desires
Historicizing Curriculum Knowledge Translation on a Global Landscape, 2021
In this chapter I weave a tapestry of theoretical threads that combine postcolonial, decolonial and psychoanalytical concerns and that (to a great extent) inform the work of the "Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures" arts/research collective, of which I am a part. The thread-insights are intentionally organized in a non-linear way, requesting from the reader the labor of contextualization and re-contextualization as an effort of co-weaving reciprocity. The weaving interlaces threads in the works of David Scott, Leela Ghandi, Ashis Nandy, Ananya Roy, Ilan Kapoor, Michalinos Zembylas, Nick Mitchel, Gayatri Spivak and Denise Ferreira da Silva, with Carl Mika's work being woven across all threads. The patterns that are woven in this process attempt to visibilize problematic normalized affective and intellectual economies focused on mastery, progress and universality at work in different attempts to critique and transform the world through human agency and imagination. They highlight the limits of modern-colonial frames of desire and intelligibility in terms of wording-the-world to control it, and the onto-epistemic difficulties of wanting, hoping and imagining something genuinely different from the parameters of reality, existence and desirability that one has inherited. The conclusion of this chapter outlines selected aspects of the work of the Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures collective and the collective's modest attempts to issue an invitation for horizons of hope to be set beyond what is imaginable within "the house modernity built". David Scott's thread In 'Refashioning futures: Criticism after postcoloniality', David Scott (1999) presents an empathetic critique of representational and epistemological claims that have been emphasized in postcolonial theory as foundational for justice-to-come (see also Andreotti 2014). In his critique, he focuses on the 'essentialism versus non-essentialism debate', drawing attention to how it reinforces a circular intellectual economy of competition for a position of epistemic privilege. He shows that the unexamined terms of intelligibility normalized in this intellectual economy severely constrain what can be imagined, asked, wanted or talked about in the actual debate. He illustrates this by showing how anti-essentialist modes of critique attempt to expose the naivety of essentialist positions using an 'epistemological law' (p. 9) that declares that cultures are heterogeneous, subjectivities are inscripted in language, identities are fluid, community borders are constructed, and so on. This strategy of delegitimisation and dismissal of essentialism, according to Scott, is used to establish epistemological superiority by historicizing answers to questions that are left unexamined. Scott explains: The anti-essentialists are not interested in what constellation of historically constituted demands may have produced the supposedly 'essentialist' formulations. They are not interested in determining what the strategic task at hand was or what the epistemic and ideological material conditions were that formed the discursive
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2001
More than twenty years ago, EP Thompson cautioned academic radicals 3 on the dangers of using social theory to paint overly-complete, too tightly-structured images of the society we live in. He charged that such theory, and especially the academic Marxism then in vogue in Britain and the United States, 4 underestimated the openness and variety of historical processes and hence the possibilities for 1 A "mirage" is something which is chimerical, fascinating, often beautiful, and possibly quite pertinent or useful, but which nonetheless leads us astray. separating our analysis of what is from what we want to be. 9 This search for comprehensive solutions to many ills --in the case of radical political economy, combating capitalism --is what we may call a utopian impulse. Although marxism has largely gone out of fashion, the utopian impulse has moved to post-modernism (and to a lesser extent, post-colonialism) on the theory side, and multi-culturalism and "cultural politics" in political practice.