Introduction to After Sound: Toward a Critical Music (original) (raw)
Related papers
Representation, Radicalism, and Music “After Sound”
Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy
This commentary presents an experimental-composer’s perspective on contemporary music therapy practice. I begin by offering my impressions of the field, gathered through interviews with practising music therapists, and an examination of the relevant literature. Then, the commentary first draws upon G. Douglas Barrett’s radical post-sonic theorisation of music to question the future of existing music in therapy, before instrumentalising avant-garde aesthetics to imagine what music may become in music therapy. This exploration will pay particular attention to the impacts of the dematerialisation of the art object in contemporary art, and the potential benefits a similar decentering of sound in contemporary music practices may provoke—specifically, the creation of theoretical frameworks that further suppress the authority of canonical forms, and increased contributions from previously-marginalised groups. Next, the commentary presents an analysis of two recent musical compositions that...
Organised Sound, 2015
The ever-increasing focus on sound in recent creative practices has ideological implications and seems to reframe and problematise ontological perspectives on music. Today it is possible to contrast notions of music as identical with sound (as in the discursive framework of ‘audio culture’) with artistic practices where sound and music arenot at allidentical, and the usually implicit hierarchy between them is probably twisted. This article discusses such matters from a methodological position that weaves together issues usually discussed in different areas of concern: it understands ecologically informed notions of sound and auditory experience as strictly intertwined with critical and inventive attitudes on technology, particularly as their intertwining is elaborated through performative practices. It suggests that, in music as well as in sound art, what we hearassound andinsound is the dynamics of anecology of situated and mediated actions, as a process that binds together (1) hum...
Organised Sound, 2022
This article addresses the precedence given to sound in musical analysis and argues that socially engaged composers might reconsider the importance they place on sonic output and instead pay greater attention to how we critically engage with the subjects that stimulate our musical practice. G. Douglas Barrett’s theorisation of music ‘after sound’ is established as a crucial methodology, one that provides an important discourse around critical engagements that have largely been neglected in favour of investigations into abstracted sonic materials. The vocabulary provided by Barrett is, in this article, used to meaningfully appraise the impact of a situated musical performance and its dialogue with society. Specifically, the three authors collectively explore the implications of Barrett’s writing for the conception, formation and evaluation of their own socially engaged compositional practices. Subsequently, this discussion also illustrates the methods by which Barrett’s approach is i...
Listen while you work: negotiating power and meaning in post-concrete music.
2019
Following the radical affordances of the then-recent technologies the microphone and tape, Musique Concrète proposed that all sound could now become music. In that moment, new boundaries in music were crossed, not just in the way theorists and composers acknowledged at the time as a flattening of sonic hierarchies, but also in the explicit revelations of meaning and power embedded in this newly recorded sound world. In arranging music from what I call s-sound for shorthand throughout (pronounced suh-sound), sound made not by musical instruments and voices but from traditionally regarded non-musical material sources or events, we are activating new ways and forms of both composing and hearing such that both the newly audible subject and the listener are implicated directly in the work, a recontextualising of what Barthes calls in his 1985 book The Responsibility Forms:‘recognising oneself in the space’. The listener can no longer be unheard, they have become a collaborator essential to both mining the strata of meaning within, and the procedural functions of the work. Along with the capacity to hear or tell stories through sound, comes an ethical dimension. Who gets to tell whose story? If composers are aware of how audiences are listening to, or missing these meanings, then it follows that this awareness and accompanying power not only interacts with the fabric of the work, but can be a tool for composition itself. What follows is a contextualising of 25 years of practical research that culminated in a book called The Music. PhD by publication, this thesis accompanies the following works :20 Pianos, A Nude, A Week in The Life of a Tree, Chorus, More More More, ONE PIG, ONE ROOM, Recomposed - Mahler’s 10th Symphony, Requiem, Speaker, The End of Silence, The Machines Our Buildings Used to Hear, The Music, The Recording, The Unheard. This thesis is not intended to be a detailed analysis or exposition of my compositional techniques, or of technologies used. I shall look instead at how I have tried to amplify, construct and examine meaning in my music by using precise s-sound recordings to tell or retell specific stories and negotiate the correspondingly inferred power with musicians, collaborators and audiences. The end point of a music made this way, might well be the “birth of the listener” following the Barthesian death of the composer, and in Chorus(2016), the final work in the thesis, the listener, as part of a temporary community finally becomes the composer.
Contemporary Art and the Problem of Music: Towards a Musical Contemporary Art
Twentieth-Century Music, 2021
This article elaborates the art-theoretical concept of 'the contemporary' along with formal differences between contemporary music and contemporary art. Contemporary art emerges from the radical transformations of the historical avant-garde and neo-avant-garde that have led to post-conceptual art-a generic art beyond specific mediums that prioritizes discursive meaning and social process-while contemporary music struggles with its status as a non-conceptual art form that inherits its concept from aesthetic modernism and absolute music. The article also considers the category of sound art and discusses some of the ways it, too, is at odds with contemporary art's generic and post-conceptual condition. I argue that, despite their respective claims to contem-poraneity, neither sound art nor contemporary music is contemporary in the historical sense of the term articulated in art theory. As an alternative to these categories, I propose 'musical contemporary art' to describe practices that depart in consequential ways from new/contemporary music and sound art.
2019
Theorists and musicologists have asked what particular musical works mean, what particular musical objects represent, what they narrate or disclose, and how those meanings got there. Recently, some thinkers have jettisoned music-language parallels in favor of investigating music’s ineffability, its sensuous effects, and the materialities of its performances. However, both routes of inquiry, whether sympathetic to the music-language analogy or not, rest on assumptions about the concept of meaning itself. Both typically ground the music-language analogy in the semantic aspects of language meaning—how language repressents, refers to, or discloses the world. If meaning and semantic representation are conflated, music’s efficacy—which exceeds its representational modalities—becomes, dissatisfyingly, the other of its meanings. This project challenges the status of representation in conceptions of the music-language analogy, developing an alternative foundation for understanding musical meaning from philosopher J. L. Austin’s concept of “performative utterances.” Austin and other thinkers in a tradition now called “ordinary language philosophy” rejected the view that language meaning is chiefly a matter of how it represents states of affairs or states of mind—its constative dimension. The performative dimension of language, however, names the ways words and sentences are used to accomplish semiotic actions and produce effects. This concept grounds language meaning in the efficacy of language use in social praxis. In Chapter 1, I develop an analogous theory of musical meaning, grounded in the semiotic actions and effects produced by music as utterance. Music is often said to be, if anything, expressive; but expression—strictly speaking, the mapping of inner content to outer signifying form—is a weak conceptual basis for what we think of when describe music as expressive. Instead, conceiving of music’s meaningfulness in terms of its efficacy as sonic utterance supplies the condition of possibility for musical expression, reference, and disclosure while also eliminating the false dichotomy between music’s meanings and its effects. In Chapters 2 through 4, drawing on fieldwork at European festivals of new music including the Darmstadt Summer Courses and Donaueschinger Musiktage, I explore works by four living composers and sound artists: Michael Beil, Peter Ablinger, Stefan Prins, and Ashley Fure. These works exemplify what I call an aesthetics of efficacy, and their meanings centrally involve the performance of communicative actions such as: the incitement of particular modes of listening, the construction of narrative identities, and the enactment of changed attitudes through musical sound and story. For instance, Ashley Fure’s The Force of Things: An Opera for Objects (2016) is a musical engagement with the problems of the Anthropocene. Through the lens of performative utterance, I characterize it as an ecocritical intervention. Fure’s work creates an abstract narrative that seeks to bring out a sense of the vibrancy and animacy of the non-human objects that star in the piece: vibrating speaker cones, percussion instruments, and elements of the mise-en-scène. Fure aims to incite listeners to leave the concert space with stronger senses of empathy and productive anxiety towards the vibrational events of the Anthropocene, including fracking-induced earthquakes or the calving of glaciers into warming oceans. The encouragement of empathies and incitement of anxieties towards the planetary ecosystem are highly salient aspects of the piece’s meaning, and these are, fundamentally, semiotic actions performed by musical sound. To fully probe performative utterance and understand its value for musical study, we must expand beyond the study of art music to investigate music in contemporary social life. Like scholars who have used Austin’s work to investigate the injurious efficacy of hate speech, I turn to examine the ethico-political stakes of the performative utterance concept, theorizing music’s potential to become injurious utterance. In Chapter 5, I critique tendencies to frame discussions concerning music as violence in materialist terms, and expose some shortcomings of this materialist, vibrational model. In Chapter 6, I conduct an observational cyber-ethnography of web forums for adult entertainers and their patrons, showing how both groups discuss strip club music’s capacity to elicit erotic dance and facilitate forms of sex work that take place in adult entertainment establishments. I argue that, for victims trafficked into strip clubs, music’s efficacy surpasses its prompting and facilitating functions, becoming the semiotic enactment of sexual violence. Music functions contextually to induce behaviors that promote precarity and rob victims of sexual agency, prompting striptease and lap dances as well as the forced solicitation of commercial sex within grossly uneven power differentials. The final chapters offer a corrective to the admittedly attractive view that music is inherently personally and socially therapeutic, arguing that such thinking is ideological and politically inefficacious.
2019
The aims of this paper are three: (1) To explain the structure of my epistemological critique of traditional musical analysis and draw its consequences, (2) to show how a musical analysis that focus on a sonic praxis and aims to generate knowledge on and through music can benefit from sound studies and (3) to outline the program of musical analysis as the analysis of sonic mediated processes of subjectivation. The structure of this paper is the following one: In the first part I'll explain the method of my epistemological critique of musical analysis and draw its consequences. I hope to reveal problems of musical analysis and show the motivations for, if not the necessity to, transform the concept of music and the purposes of analysis in mainstream musical analysis. In the second part I'll discuss two key concepts of sound studies from which musical analysis can benefit: Relationality and Materiality. I argue here that musical analysis should involve the analysis of a historical, cultural and media specific sonic praxis, in which techniques and technologies are constitutive to what music is. In the third part I'll outline my project of musical analysis as the analysis of sonic mediated processes of subjectivation.