Science Serialized: Representations of the Sciences in Nineteenth-Century Periodicals (Technology and Culture, 2005) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Periodical Formats in the Market
Review of Gowan Dawson, Bernard Lightman, Sally Shuttleworth, and Jonathan R. Topham, eds, Science Periodicals in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Constructing Scientific Communities (2020)
Towards a history of scientific publishing
History of Science, 2022
Towards a history of scientific publishing (accepted version) (Introduction to the special issue "Cultures of scientific publishing", History of Science 60/2 (2022)) Although individual aspects of a history of scientific publishing have been intensively researched, other dimensions of the field continue to be less visible. With a few exceptions-Ludwik Fleck and his concept of the Denkkollektiv (thought collective) and Bruno Latour's science in action-, 1 integrative approaches to a constructivist and practice-orientated history of science including Knorr-Cetina's epistemic cultures, Pickstone's ways of knowing and Ankeny's and Leonelli's repertoires have also touched on publishing only marginally, if at all. 2 There are a number of reasons for this. On the one hand, the lasting concentration of historians of science on object-related practices has diminished their interest in scientific textuality and print. 3 On the other, for many if not most historians of science, publication practices and their protagonists lie outside the realm of what they consider to be 'science'as if the making and the communication of science can be categorically separated from each other. This special issue aims to correlate the practice of making science with the practice of making it public, address the thematic, chronological and geographical breadth of scientific publishing, and thus hopes to contribute to a more integrative history of this topic. Scientific journals have so far been at the centre of attention. Interest has focused on their predecessors from the second half of the seventeenth century, in particular, the Philosophical transactions, the Journal des sçavans and the Acta eruditorum; on their thematic diversification from the second half of the eighteenth century; and, finally, on the rise of the journal to become the main medium for publishing the results of scientific research. Much work has been done recently in Anglophone history of science on how this process unfolded in Britain, so this does not need to be repeated here. 4 Instead, two
Science for all: The popularization of science in early twentieth-century Britain
Science Education, 2011
The periodic release of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) report provides a regular opportunity for science educators and scientists alike to bemoan the sorry state of Americans' basic knowledge of science. Americans, we are reminded, do not understand science and lag behind citizens of other industrialized countries. We hear the familiar calls for the United States to improve science education in order for the country to remain competitive in an increasingly global economy. Improving science education for all, the argument goes, promises economic stability. Science educators have traditionally responded to these calls by suggesting reforms in the formal educational system. Yet, by focusing on school science, educators have tended to overlook other popular spaces where the public encounters science as often, if not more often: in books, in magazines, on television, and in other forms of popular media. In today's socially and technologically networked and complex world, learning about science through such informal resources promises to increase in relevance. One need only look at the recent National Research Council (2009) report Learning Science in Informal Environments to see the increasing recognition of these spaces. Such informal spaces for learning about science, however, are not new. In his latest book, Peter J. Bowler narrates the rich and complex history of popular science in a time much like ours of today: early 20th-century Britain. His work not only stands on its own as an excellent piece of historical scholarship, highly engaging and meticulously researched, but also promises to enrich science educators' understanding of how the public comes to understand, interact, and learn about science as well as the ways in which economic, social, and national factors influence the production of this material. The book is especially timely, as today's economic and social circumstances in many ways parallel those from a century ago: reduced costs of media production, increasing specialization of scientific knowledge, profusion of everyday technologies, and further networking of the global market. There seems to be a similar urgency now, as there was then, for increasing scientific understanding among the public. Bowler's book surveys science books, pamphlets, magazines, and newspapers written for the general public from the late 1890s through World War II. These media, each intended for a different audience, served a variety of political, pedagogical, and financial purposes. Bowler weaves, to a varying degree of success, each strand into his story. Most impressive about the book is the vast trove of media collected and the biographical register compiled at the end of the book. Unable to find many popular sources in libraries, Bowler has collected a myriad of pamphlets and self-help books, has sifted through daily newspapers and weekly magazines, and has even included some relevant archival material in order to point to the shifting ways in which publishers, scientists, and journalists negotiated with each other in
The word 'periodical' immediately calls to mind huge stacks of bound volumes neatly arranged on library shelves. Yet, in historical terms, it would be hard to claim that 'periodical' is a word endowed with a definite and univocal connotation. Even the criterion of 'periodicity' leaves a lot out of account. Forms historically assumed by periodicals often envisaged regular schedules of appearance, but this was often more of a wish than a reality. Thus, great care needs to be taken in accepting at face value the dating of issues and volumes. Scientific periodicals, whether purely professional or purely commercial (and the many forms in between), existed in given historical circumstances and had to compete with different and alternative forms of publication which were also issued in instalments (especially dictionaries and encyclopaedias). They were not the only or even the preferred vehicle for a scientist to communicate or engage in debate. The role of the reading public, in science as well as in many other matters, was never one of a passive receiver: during the long nineteenth century, in several countries, readers claimed the right to intervene in scientific debates, and favoured publications that appeared to accommodate their demands. Whoever has walked through major library stacks in the Western World, let alone museum libraries, has been stunned by rooms filled up to the ceilings with bound periodicals. Often, much abundant shelf space is also devoted to collections of offprints which famous local savants donated to their institution. 1 Periodicals are a hard physical fact: a few spanning centuries, several others scores of decades. Volume numbers and years of publications are usually well displayed on the spine, although the title page often refers to successive series of the periodical, indicating breaks and recurring difficulties. Their inescapable materiality is an ostensible testimony to the persistence of scientific communication among communities, often spanning nation states at war with each other. With the exception of centenary celebrations, scholarship focusing on scientific periodicals as a genre, or as commercial ventures, has taken a long time to develop, even *pietro.corsi@history.ox.ac.uk
Literature and Science in the Nineteenth Century An Anthology Oxford World 039 s Classics
The material in this anthology comes from novels, plays, poetry, essays, scientific articles, lectures, treatises, and textbooks written throughout the course of the nineteenth century. It demonstrates the fertile exchange of ideas that took place between writers in very different disciplines, and reveals fascinating dialogues and confluences, as well as instructive distinctions.