Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema (original) (raw)

Prostate gland motion and deformation caused by needle placement during brachytherapy

Nelson Stone

Brachytherapy, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Prostate brachytherapy in patients with prostate volumes ≥ 50 cm3: dosimetic analysis of implant quality

Nelson Stone

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants

Peter Roberson

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Prostate HDR brachytherapy catheter displacement between planning and treatment delivery

Nitya Patanjali

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Dosimetric effect of interfractional needle displacement in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Keith Furutani

Brachytherapy, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Prostate volume changes during permanent seed brachytherapy: an analysis of intra-operative variations, predictive factors and clinical implication

Jean-françois Carrier

Radiation Oncology, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Impact of selection of post-implant technique on dosimetry parameters for permanent prostate implants

A. Haworth

Brachytherapy, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Minimal displacement of novel self-anchoring catheters suitable for temporary prostate implants

Kees Koedooder

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes

Barbara Longobardi

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of MRI pulse sequences in defining prostate volume after permanent implantation

Wayne Butler

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

HDR prostate monotherapy – Dosimetric effects of implant deformation due to posture change between TRUS- and CT-imaging

john praag

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Sector analysis of 125I permanent prostate brachytherapy provides a rapid and effective method of evaluating and comparing pre- and post-implant dosimetry

R. Verghis

Brachytherapy, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: a comparison of prostate quadrants

Michelle Hilts

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Prostate brachytherapy post-implant dosimetry: A comparison between higher and lower source density

Colleen McGahan

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Intra-fraction prostate displacement in radiotherapy estimated from pre- and post-treatment imaging of patients with implanted fiducial markers

Annette Haworth, Alan Herschtal

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Seed Displacements after Permanent Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer in Dependence on the Prostate Level

Holger Borchers

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical Investigations Case series analysis of post-brachytherapy prostate edema and its relevance to post-implant dosimetry. Post-implant prostate edema and dosimetry

Hani Ashamalla

Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Importance of Post-Implant Dosimetry in Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy

Nelson Stone

European Urology, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Dynamic dose-feedback prostate brachytherapy in patients with large prostates and/or planned transurethral surgery before implantation

Peter Acher

BJU International, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Prostate deformation from inflatable rectal probe cover and dosimetric effects in prostate seed implant brachytherapy

Jun Lian

Medical physics, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: Report of the American Brachytherapy Society

Jay Ciezki, Nelson Stone

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

High dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer: catheter and gland movement between fractions

Linda Bryant

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Quantifying (125)I placement accuracy in prostate brachytherapy using postimplant transrectal ultrasound images

Muhammad Fauzi Jamaluddin

Brachytherapy, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?

Matthew Palmer

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Positioning errors and prostate motion during conformal prostate radiotherapy using on-line isocentre set-up verification and implanted prostate markers

Mo Abdolell

Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluation of Dose-Volume Histograms after Prostate Seed Implantation

Oliver Hakenberg

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Modern prostate brachytherapy

Wayne Butler

Medical Dosimetry, 2000

View PDFchevron_right