Population dynamics and the ecological stability of obligate pollination mutualisms (original) (raw)

Abstract

Mutualistic interactions almost always produce both costs and benefits for each of the interacting species. It is the difference between gross benefits and costs that determines the net benefit and the per-capita effect on each of the interacting populations. For example, the net benefit of obligate pollinators, such as yucca and senita moths, to plants is determined by the difference between the number of ovules fertilized from moth pollination and the number of ovules eaten by the pollinator's larvae. It is clear that if pollinator populations are large, then, because many eggs are laid, costs to plants are large, whereas, if pollinator populations are small, gross benefits are low due to lack of pollination. Even though the size and dynamics of the pollinator population are likely to be crucial, their importance has been neglected in the investigation of mechanisms, such as selective fruit abortion, that can limit costs and increase net benefits. Here, we suggest that both the population size and dynamics of pollinators are important in determining the net benefits to plants, and that fruit abortion can significantly affect these. We develop a model of mutualism between populations of plants and their pollinating seed-predators to explore the ecological consequences of fruit abortion on pollinator population dynamics and the net effect on plants. We demonstrate that the benefit to a plant population is unimodal as a function of pollinator abundance, relative to the abundance of flowers. Both selective abortion of fruit with eggs and random abortion of fruit, without reference to whether they have eggs or not, can limit pollinator population size. This can increase the net benefits to the plant population by limiting the number of eggs laid, if the pollination rate remains high. However, fruit abortion can possibly destabilize the pollinator population, with negative consequences for the plant population.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (66)

  1. Addicott JF (1979) A multispecies aphid-ant association: density dependence and species-specific effects. Can J Zool 57:558-569
  2. Addicott JF (1981) Stability properties of 2-species models of mu- tualism: simulation studies. Oecologia 49:42-49
  3. Addicott JF (1984) Mutualistic interactions in population and community processes. In: Price PW, Slobodchikoff CN, Gaud WS (eds) A new ecology: novel approaches to interactive sys- tems. Wiley, New York, pp 437-455
  4. Addicott JF (1986) Variation in the costs and benefits of mutual- ism: the interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. Oecolo- gia 70:486-494
  5. Addicott JF (1998) Regulation of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths: population level processes. Oikos 81:119-129
  6. Addicott JF, BaoT (1999) Limiting the costs of mutualism: multi- ple modes of interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:197-202
  7. Addicott JF, Tyre AJ (1995) Cheating in an obligate mutualism: how often do yucca moths benefit yuccas? Oikos 72:382-394
  8. Addicott JF, Bronstein J, Kjellberg F (1990) Evolution of mutualistic life-cycles: yucca moths and fig wasps. In: Gilbert F (ed) Insect life cycles: genetics, evolution, and co-ordina- tion. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 143-161
  9. Aker CL, Udovic D (1981) Oviposition and pollination behavior of the yucca moth, Tegeticula maculata (Lepidoptera: Prodox- idae), and its relation to the reproductive biology of Yucca whipplei (Agavaceae). Oecologia 49:96-101
  10. Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1954) The distribution and abun- dance of animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  11. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390-1396
  12. Bever JD (1999) Dynamics within mutualism and the maintenance of diversity: inference from a model of interguild frequency dependence. Ecol Lett 2:52-61
  13. Breton LM, Addicott JF (1992) Density-dependent mutualism in an aphid-ant interaction. Ecology 73:2175-2180
  14. Bronstein JL (1992) Seed predators as mutualists: ecology and evolution of the fig/pollinator interaction. In: Bernays EA (ed) Insect-plant interactions, vol IV. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 1-44
  15. Bronstein JL (1994a) Our current understanding of mutualism. Q Rev Biol 69:31-51
  16. Bronstein JL (1994b) Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interac- tions. Trends Ecol Evol 9:214-17
  17. Bull JJ, Rice WR (1991) Distinguishing mechanisms for the evo- lution of cooperation. J Theor Biol 149:63-74
  18. Cushman JH, Whitman TG (1989) Conditional mutualism in a membracid-ant association: temporal, age-specific, and densi- ty-dependent effects. Ecology 70:1040-1047
  19. Dean AM (1983) A simple model of mutualism. Am Nat 121:409-417
  20. DeAngelis DL, Travis CC, Post WM (1979) Persistence and sta- bility of seed-dispersed species in a patchy environment. The- or Pop Biol 16:107-125
  21. DeAngelis DL, Post WM, Travis CC (1986) Positive feedback in natural systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
  22. Fleming TH, Holland JN (1998) The evolution of obligate pollina- tion mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth. Oecologia 114:368-375
  23. Fuller OS (1990) Factors affecting the balance of cooperation and conflict between the yucca moth, Tegeticula yuccasella, and its mutualist, Yucca glauca. Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
  24. Goh BS (1979) Stability in models of mutualism. Am Nat 113:261-275
  25. Gutierrez AP (1996) Applied population ecology: A supply-de- mand approach. Wiley, New York
  26. Hemborg AM, Despres L (1999) Oviposition by mutualistic seed- parasitic pollinators and its effects on annual fitness of single- and multi-flowered host plants. Oecologia 120:427-436
  27. Herre EA (1989) Coevolution of reproductive characteristics of 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps. Experi- entia 45:637-647
  28. Herre EA (1996) An overview of studies on a community of Pana- manian figs. J Biogeogr 23:593-607
  29. Herre EA, West SA (1997) Conflict of interest in a mutualism: documenting the elusive fig wasp-seed trade-off. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1501-1507
  30. Holland JN, Fleming TH (1999a) Mutualistic interactions between Upiga virescens (Pyralidae), a pollinating seed-consumer, and Lophocereus schottii (Cactaceae). Ecology 80:2074-2084
  31. Holland JN, Fleming TH (1999b) Geographic and population vari- ation in pollinating seed-consuming interactions between seni- ta cacti (Lophocereus schottii) and senita moths (Upiga viresc- ens). Oecologia 121:405-410
  32. James CA, Hoffman MT, Lightfoot DC, Forbes GS, Whitford WG (1994) Fruit abortion in Yucca elata and its implications for the mutualistic association with yucca moths. Oikos 69:207-216
  33. Janzen DH (1979) How to be a fig. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:13-51
  34. Kingsolver RW (1984) Population biology of a mutualistic associ- ation: Yucca glauca and Tegeticula yuccesella. Dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence
  35. Massey LK, Hamrick JL (1998) Genetic diversity and population structure of Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae). Am J Bot 85:340-345
  36. May RM (1981) Models of two interacting populations. In: May RM (ed) Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Blackwell, Boston, pp 78-104
  37. Mazancourt C de, Loreau M (2000a) Grazing optimization, nu- trient cycling, and spatial heterogeneity of plant-herbivore interactions: should a palatable plant evolve? Evolution 54:81-92
  38. Mazancourt C de, Loreau M (2000b) Effect of herbivory and plant species replacement on primary production. Am Nat 155: 735-734
  39. Mazancourt C de, Loreau M, Abbadie L (1998) Grazing optimiza- tion and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production? Ecology 79:2242-2252
  40. Mazancourt C de, Loreau M, Abbadie L (1999) Grazing optimiza- tion and nutrient cycling: potential impact of large herbivores in a Savanna system. Ecol Appl 9:784-797
  41. Morales MA (2000) Mechanisms and density dependence of bene- fit in an ant-membracid mutualism. Ecology 81:482-489
  42. Murray MG (1985) Figs (Ficus spp.) and fig wasps (Chalcidoidae, Agaonidae): hypotheses for an ancient symbiosis. Biol J Linn Soc 26:69-81
  43. Nefdt RJC, Compton SG (1996) Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J Anim Ecol 65:170-182
  44. Nicholson AJ, Bailey VA (1935) The balance of animal popula- tions, part I. Proc Zool Soc Lond, pp 551-598
  45. Pellmyr O (1989) The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites. Oecologia 78:53-59
  46. Pellmyr O (1992) The phylogeny of a mutualism: evolution and coadaptation between Trollius and its seed-parasitic pollina- tors. Biol J Linn Soc 47:337-365
  47. Pellmyr O, Huth CJ (1994) Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372:257-260
  48. Pellmyr O, Thompson JN, Brown JM, Harrison RG (1996) Evolu- tion of pollination and mutualism in the yucca moth lineage. Am Nat 148:827-847
  49. Pellmyr O, Massey LK, Hamrick JL, Feist MA (1997) Genetic consequences of specialization: yucca moth behavior and self- pollination in yuccas. Oecologia 109:273-278
  50. Powell JA (1984) Biological interrelationships of moths and Yucca schottii. Univ Calif Publ Entomol 100:1-93
  51. Rau P (1945) The yucca plant, Yucca filamentosa, and the yucca moth, Tegeticula (Pronuba) yuccasella Riley: an ecologico-be- havior study. Ann Mo Bot Gard 32:373-394
  52. Richter KS, Weis AE (1995) Differential abortion in the yucca. Nature 376:557-558
  53. Riley CV (1892) The yucca moth and yucca pollination. Ann Rep Mo Bot Gard 3:99-159
  54. Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate caus- es and ultimate functions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:253-79
  55. Sutherland S (1986) Patterns of fruit-set: what controls fruit-flow- er ratios in plants? Evolution 40:117-128
  56. Sutherland S, Delph LF (1984) On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit-set. Ecology 65:1093-1104
  57. Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1992) Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: constraints on specialization. Ecology 73:1780-1791
  58. Thompson WR (1939) Biological control and the theories of the interaction of populations. Parasitology 31:299-388
  59. Travis CC, Post WF (1979) Dynamics and comparative statics of mutualistic communities. J Theor Biol 78:553-571
  60. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35-57
  61. Vandermeer JH, Boucher DH (1978) Varieties of mutualistic inter- action in population models. J Theor Biol 74:549-558
  62. Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043-1060
  63. Wilson RD, Addicott JF (1998) Regulation of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths: is oviposition behavior responsive to selective abscission of flowers? Oikos 81:109-118
  64. Wolin CL (1985) The population dynamics of mutualistic systems. In: Boucher DH (ed) The biology of mutualism: ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 248-269
  65. Wolin CL, Lawlor LR (1984) Models of facultative mutualism: density effects. Am Nat 124:843-862
  66. Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131:723-738