National Brand-Private Brand Strategic Alliances Through Ingredient Branding: An Exploratory Empirical Evaluation (original) (raw)

Extending the view of brand alliance effects

International Marketing Review, 2007

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to broaden the external validity of the “brand alliance” theory, as it is set up by Simonin and Ruth, by analysing transnational brand alliances. It aims to discuss the significance of country of origin in this context.Design/methodology/approachBased on a broad literature review of the brand alliance and country of origin literature the authors conducted an empirical study that examined consumer attitudes towards cross‐national brand alliances.FindingsThe findings demonstrate the role that the relationship between country of origin fit and brand fit plays in predicting consumer attitude towards cross‐border brand alliances; and that when brand familiarity decreases, the positive influence of country of origin fit on attitudes towards the brand alliance increases, and is greater than that of brand fit.Research limitations/implicationsThe degree of importance that consumers place on each product in the brand alliance was not taken into account. Fut...

Extending the view of brand alliance effects: An integrative examination of the role of country of origin

International Marketing …, 2007

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to broaden the external validity of the "brand alliance" theory, as it is set up by Simonin and Ruth, by analysing transnational brand alliances. It aims to discuss the significance of country of origin in this context. Design/methodology/approach -Based on a broad literature review of the brand alliance and country of origin literature the authors conducted an empirical study that examined consumer attitudes towards cross-national brand alliances. Findings -The findings demonstrate the role that the relationship between country of origin fit and brand fit plays in predicting consumer attitude towards cross-border brand alliances; and that when brand familiarity decreases, the positive influence of country of origin fit on attitudes towards the brand alliance increases, and is greater than that of brand fit.

Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes

Journal of Marketing Research, 1998

The authors examine the growing and pervasive phenomenon of brand alliances as they affect consumers' brand attitudes. The results of the main study (n = 350) and two replication studies (n = 150, n = 210) together demonstrate that (1) consumer attitudes toward the brand alliance influence subsequent impressions of each partner's brand (l.e., "spillover" effects), (2) brand familiarity moderates the strength of relations between constructs in a manner consistent with information integration and attitude accessibility theories, and (3) each partner brand is not necessarily affected equally by its participation in a particular alliance. These results represent a first, necessary step in understanding why and how a brand could be affected by "the company it keeps" in its brand alliance relationships. Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes Compaq President-CEO Eckhard Pfeiffer last week blasted Intel at a computer conference in Spain, claiming among otherpoints that "Intel Inside" detracts from the Compaq brand (Advertising Age; see Johnson 1994). The role and impact of brands in consumer behavior has witnessed a resurgence of interest, with focal issues ranging from consumer evaluations of brand extensions to brand equity (Aaker and Keller 1990; Loken and Roedder John 1993; see also lMR's 1994 special issue on brand equity). One consumer brand marketing strategy that has experienced explosive growth in the 1990s has been the use of comarketing or joint branding, in which two (or more) brands are presented simultaneously to consumers (e.g., Intel microprocessors "inside" Compaq personal computers). In recent years, cooperative brand activities have enjoyed a 40% annual growth rate (Spethmann and Benezra 1994), with examples ranging from Breyer's ice cream containing Reese's Pieces candies to the bundling of branded computer soft

A typology of brand alliances and consumer awareness of brand alliance integration

Marketing Letters, 2018

Brand alliances, which involve intentionally presenting two or more brands together, appear in many different forms. For example, Subway stores placed within Wal-Mart, Airbus A380 airplanes with Rolls-Royce Trent engines, and Nike+iPod co-developed personal trainers are among the more well-known manifestations of this strategy. Our study contributes to the literature on brand alliances by conceptualizing and measuring a typology of brand alliance types based on their degree of integration. We also empirically test and find that consumers are sensitive to varying degrees of brand alliance integration. We then link these findings to the managerial decision of how and with whom a brand should form an alliance. We use extensive examples, conversations with managers, and survey-based experiments to show that brand alliance integration is relevant and impactful to both managers and consumers.

Brand Alliance, a Strategy to Enter New Markets and a Tool for Positioning

Journal of Knowledge Management Economics and Information Technology, 2013

Brand alliance has emerged in the last two decades as a form of cooperation between two or more established brand names and has expanded as a business strategy to include both the production/ service sectors. This strategy is taking different forms; the most common one is co-branding which involves associating a single product with more than one brand name. .Another approach to create a brand alliance is brand licensing, in which one business obtains the rights to utilize the brand name owned by another business for a specific project or activity under a licensing agreement or contract. The third common approach is known as cross-marketing, and this implies the creation for a joint marketing campaign which allows two or more companies to promote each other and consequently broaden their prospective consumer bases.Brand alliance may be a short-term tactical partnership to increase awareness in the consumer's minds, promote sales and provide urgent financial resources, as it may also be a long-term strategic tool for brand growth and development and marketing success. In this sense, relying on a case study which involves a contracted alliance since 2005, between Algeria post foundation and mobiles branch, the researcher will try to demonstrate the advantages of such a strategy for these two operators, as a tool to enlarge the target population, penetrate new markets, strengthen the brand image in the mind of the consumer and reinforce its competitive position.

Spillover Effects of Ingredient Branding Strategies on Brand Choice: A Field Study

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000

ABSTRACT Ingredient branding, or the use of two or more brand names on a single product, is widely seen as providing significant benefits in terms of increased product differentiation and greater market share. The association between two brand names can both enhance and dilute the brand equity of the host brand name and the ingredient brand name. This research examines the behavioral spillover effects associated with co-branded strategies across segments of consumers that vary in their prior brand commitment or loyalty. Different from previous research, this paper uses A.C. Nielsen scanner panel data to investigate the behavioral spillover effects of ingredient branded products on choice of the host and ingredient brands in a field setting. The results suggest that there is a significant behavioral spillover impact of trial of the co-branded product on the purchase probability of both the host and ingredient brands. This effect is greater among prior non-loyal users and prior non-users of the host and ingredient brands and when there is a higher degree of perceived fit between the host and ingredient brands.

CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD PRIVATE BRANDS AND NATIONAL BRANDS

2010

SUMMARY Brands today face consumers who are increasingly retrenching as a result of the recession plus growing competition from global companies. In addition, marketers of branded goods, especially consumer packaged goods, find that competition from private label goods (store brands, own labels) represents a growing threat to their financial health (Levy 2009; Retail Forward 2009).

Increasing the Brand Equity of Private Label Brands

International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management, 2017

This paper was developed to investigate the different factors affecting the Brand Equity of Private Label Brands and Perceived Value in the Egyptian market. 578 random shoppers in 26 branches all over Egypt completed questionnaire about their perception of different factors affecting Brand Equity. Brand Associations, Perceived Value and Brand Loyalty are considered the most important factors that affect the Brand Equity of Private Label Brands; However, Perceived Quality, Brand Image and Brand Awareness are considered to be the least effective factors. Demographics were found to be insignificant. Marketers should focus on the top three effective factors, which are Brand Associations, Perceived Value and Brand Loyalty in order to increase the Brand Equity of the Private Label Brands. The results will offer direction to marketers and decision makers, especially that Private Label Brands are increasing dramatically.