The dilemma of the art museum: reconciling modernity and the new town square (original) (raw)
Related papers
Limiting the Horizons of Public Reflection: Constructing Museums Outside Societies
2018
Museums have transformed from glorifying platforms of religious, mythical, environmental themes consolidating a statist identity to a vulgarising space of self-association and reflection of localised identities. This paper seeks to scrutinise the role of museums as pure spaces of public reflection by using the recent Swedish satirical drama film The Square as a tool of analysis. It further explores the question of transition in the nature of museums as places of high culture to an open space of association and interaction by any individual, made possible with the epoch of modern art. The extent to which museums can be categorised as platforms for engaging in identity-making is a critical point of contention. This is analysed through the life of the artist, the protagonist in the film, who is portrayed through his contradictory nature of engaging with his recent art installation, ‘The Square’ bearing the idea, “Square is a sanctuary of trust and caring. Within its bounds we all share equal rights and obligations” and personal life, exhibited in the film through his prejudiced personal political and social views. An attempt is made to place the study within the larger context of conflicting interests between the provisions of entertainment and marketing opportunities and the creation of inclusive spaces of socio-political interactions.
2022
On the occasion of the 20-year anniversary of the /ecm Master Program in Exhibition Theory and Practice at the University of Applied Arts Vienna Thursday, May 5, 2022, 10am–9pm The museum is dead. Long live the museum. This, or something similar, could be the brief summary of numerous conferences, debates, and publications in the field of curating and museum studies over the past 20 years. The critique of the museum has been widely discussed. We have heard a lot about crisis and departure, we have heard about “tired museums” and the “end of the museum,” only to debate in that same breath untapped possibilities for thinking about the museum in new and different ways – as a space of assembly and as a contact zone, as a place of criticism, polyphony, and negotiation. Something seems to be on the move, and so it is not surprising that talk of the “museum of the future” is booming. Claims of diversification, digitalization, and democratization have become ubiquitous, while at the same time institutions are more than ever focused on privatization, economization, competition, and precarization. How can we as critical curators and museologists think and act within these contradictions? And how can critical theory become critical practice?
Art Museums and Publicness: The Pursuit of Democratisation from the 1960s to the Present Day
Within the current context of privatisation and commercialisation, there is a group of European institutions – all part of a confederation called L’Internationale – which are actively trying to rethink the role of the art museum as a public space that fosters debate and speculation about possible alternatives. Setting out to explore what is or should be the public role of an art museum in the 21st century, this paper will present the mission, activities, and shared vision of L’Internationale and two of its key members, the Van Abbemuseum in Eindhoven and Museum van Hedendaagse Kunst in Antwerp. Their critical approach will be set within a broader trajectory of demands for democratisation of the museum from the 1960s onwards: namely, Institutional Critique, the planning and development of the Pompidou Centre, new museology, and New Institutionalism. What becomes apparent through this historical perspective is that the ‘demand for democratisation’ today is not only voiced through artists, museologists, curators, or independent art spaces, but from a group of museums that altogether call for a profound rethinking of the institution. This fact speaks of a broader need to not only radically experiment within existing structures but also renegotiate the very notion of publicness itself.
When the museum becomes the message for participating audiences
This article aims to analyse the notion of participation in the museum context using an audience studies perspective. Museums are increasingly competing for the attention of the public in the arenas of leisure and education, the process of which is part of the commercialisation of the museum institution. In addition, a turn towards interactivity is taking place in museums, and while that might serve well to revitalise the museum and bring it closer to its audiences, it does not sufficiently support realisation of the change of the museum institution into a laboratory-type museum (de Varine, 1988, van Mensch, 2005) -a concept defined through the communicative and democratic aspects of the museum. As is the case with many public institutions, the democratisation of society is increasing the need for transparency and accountability, which in turn has brought public engagement to the attention of the museum. According to , museums need to find a balance between the activities of the museum and audiences: the (potential) need to overcome the shyness of expertise combined with the need to organise the (potential) flood of amateurs.
The Dangerous Museum. Participatory practices and controversy in museums today
Nordisk Museologi
Whereas museums shunned controversy in the past, this article argues that as museums embrace the new trend of audience participation some have also opted to introduce “hot topics” into museum exhibitions. Museum professionals who have adopted this particular form of museum practice predict that it has the potential to reform museums as we know them, and to turn museums into active agents for democratic change in society. In a bid to understand and scrutinize the implications of this development in museums, the article consults critiques raised by art critics writing about a related development in contemporary art, i.e. relational and participatory art forms.
Unapologetically Political and Sociological: Developing and Renewing Museum Spaces
Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 2018
Abstract:In the context of Malta’s Valletta 2018 commitment to maximise, popularise and ‘Europeanise’ its cultural spaces, this paper examines the role of national museum spaces in the contemporary era of cultural hybridity, liquidity (Bauman, 2000) and mobility. Departing from a critical pedagogical framework, the paper examines how ‘national’ cultural sites which have historically served to reproduce hegemonic ‘imagined communities’ (Anderson 1991), can be genuinely transformed into ‘ecologies of cognition’ (de Sousa Santos 2006). These are dynamic public spaces where cognitive justice and democracy are affirmed. The role of curators as mediators of knowledges and as adult educators within mainly state-sponsored institutions will be interrogated. Also problematised is the notion of ‘national’ and ‘permanent collection’ in a Maltese context which is dynamic and cosmopolitan. In the final analysis, this paper will contribute to the ongoing search for greater participation of the Mal...
‘Museums and the subversion of the exhibitionary order: Playing with Enlightenment values’.
2011
This text offers a commentary on efforts by museums to justify their activity in post-modernity. The passing of the modernist paradigm of knowledge production has spurred museums to search out new ways of classifying and representing the world, expressing new identities, trends, views, and challenges to Enlightenment thought. Foucauldian thought as concerns the genealogy of knowledge is employed here as a tool for analyzing museums as places of difference, both from other places as well as from the intellectual principles and frameworks in which museum artifacts are normally understood. The text incorporates in the above reflections cases of “exhibitionary subversion” such as the Museum of Sir John Soane in London which employ contemporary artworks within their permanent collections, thus making museums privileged places for a critical treatment of the epistemological limits of the knowledge they produce.
Social movement theory has, in recent years, been criticized for its inability to develop theoretical frameworks and forms of analysis relevant to activists and the causes they represent. In contrast, the same period has seen an escalation of claims made about the instrumentality of museums to source communities and stakeholder groups as well as governments. Ideas of shared authority, empowerment through recognition, community collaboration, and political agency have transformed the field of museum studies. In this chapter, I draw on theorizing from the field of museum studies and on several case studies that explore the relationship between collective action and the Smithsonian Institution to highlight and address the lacunae evident in social movement theory, and propose analytical alternatives. In so doing, I revisit Clifford's argument that museums can function as contact zones.