Cross-country causes and consequences of the 2008 crisis: early warning (original) (raw)
Related papers
EMG Working Paper Series WP-EMG-01-2012 ‘ Global Crises and Equity Market Contagion ’
2012
Using the 2007-09 financial crisis as a laboratory, we analyze the transmission of crises to country-industry equity portfolios in 55 countries. We use a factor model to predict crisis returns, defining unexplained increases in factor loadings and residual correlations as indicative of contagion. We find statistically significant evidence of contagion from US markets and from the global financial sector, but the effects are economically small. By contrast, there has been substantial contagion from domestic equity markets to individual domestic equity portfolios, with its severity inversely related to the quality of countries’ economic fundamentals and policies. This confirms the old “wake-up call” hypothesis, with markets and investors focusing substantially more on countryspecific characteristics during the crisis. JEL No.: F3, G14, G15
Modeling the Financial Crisis with the Global, Econometric E3MG Model
The Iup Journal of Applied Economics, 2009
ABSTRACT : Recent developments in global finance and the world economy have demonstrated some of the shortcomings in the widely-applied equilibrium-based modeling approach. In this paper, the global E3MG model (www.e3mgmodel.com) has been applied to assess the impacts of the crisis that began in 2008 with the so-called credit crunch. E3MG is a sectoral input-output model (including the banking sector), based on the system of national accounts. The model includes 20 global regions and uses annual time series data. E3MG’s parameters are estimated using error-correction methodology, making it an almost unique tool in being able to assess short-term sectoral impacts, as well as long-term trends. Using E3MG, an analysis of the crisis and current (January, 2009) policy measures has been build up through a series of carefully-defined scenarios, simulating aspects of behavioral changes within the banking sector and in the wider global economy. The results help to explain the mechanisms through which the real economy has been impacted by the crisis and give an indication of the effectiveness of current policy. Finally, the paper considers the effects of policy measures designed to restore confidence in the global financial system that are coordinated at the global level, following the ‘seven-point plan’ outlined in Barker (2009).
Leading Factors Of The Global Financial Crisis – The Us Evidence
2018
The global economic scene towards the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century has suffered a series of financial crises that had serious consequences in the developed economies in which they initially emerged, but their impact also caused serious problems in many other countries, hence, had a strong negative impact on the global economic development overall. The global financial crisis originally started as an US financial crisis of 2007/08, transmitting globally after the fall of Lehman Brothers impacting the rest of the developed and developing countries. The subsequent European debt crisis, is proof that financial crises are still present and pose a serious threat in the future onto the development of the world economy in general. Therefore, in this paper we conducted an analysis of the leading factors that caused the global financial crisis. According to the literature and the empirical work conducted, we can classify these factors in two major groups: macroeconomi...
Transmission of International Financial Shocks: A Cross Country Analysis
Asian Development Policy Review, 2020
This study measures the extent of crosscountry financial shock spillover by utilizing Diebold and Yilmaz (2009); Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) method and using the impulse response function of the VAR model, it explores the important channel through which financial shocks transmit among the US, Japan, Germany, China, India, and Russia. The result shows that total financial shock spillover is 43.60%, indicating that slightly more than two-fifths of the total variance of the forecast errors for six countries under consideration is explained by their shock spillover across countries. The finding is observed to be robust. Using the impulse response of the VAR model, we examined the relative importance of channels viz. financial, exchange rate, and trade. We observed that 46% of external financial shocks transmit to US through the financial channel, while it is predominantly the trade channel through which shocks transmit to Japan (43%), Germany (43%), and China (76%). India receives major shocks (74%) through exchange rate. Finally, trade and financial channels are important for Russia through which 76% of shocks come from external financial markets. The spillover is observed to be high which could be because of the increasing deregulation of financial markets including capital mobility in 21 st century. Contribution/ Originality: This study contributes in four ways: (i) it considers both advanced and emerging economies, (ii) captures financial shocks through composite interest rate index (IRI), (iii) employs spillover method developed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2009); Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) and (iv) examines the contribution of channels which previous literature did not address. Global Financial Crisis (2007-09) began in 2007 from subprime mortgage market in the USA and took the turn of a great depression of 1930"s. It advanced into fullblown global banking crisis with the collapse of the Lehman Brother"s Investment Bank in 2008.
Cross-country experiences and policy implications from the global financial crisis
Economic Policy, 2010
The financial crisis of 2007-2008 is rooted in a number of factors, some common to previous financial crises, others new. Analysis of post-crisis macroeconomic and financial sector performance for 58 advanced countries and emerging markets shows a differential impact of old and new factors. Factors common to other crises, like asset price bubbles and current account deficits, help to explain cross-country differences in the severity of real economic impacts. New factors, such as increased financial integration and dependence on wholesale funding, help to account for the amplification and global spread of the financial crisis. Our findings point to vulnerabilities to be monitored and areas of needed national and international reforms to reduce risk of future crises and cross-border spillovers. They also reinforce a (sad) state of knowledge: much of how crises start and spread remains unknown.
Global Financial Crisis of 2008-09: Triggers, Trails, Travails, and Treatments
The IUP Journal of Applied Economics, 2009
The present world economy has, increasingly, been interconnected in terms of small units such as industries, regions and national economies as discontinuous systems. Changes in these systems have varied impact across the world economies. This paper tries to trace out various triggers, trails and travails of the present crisis, with a view to suggest solutions or treatments for the global financial crisis of 2008-09. For instance, one of the triggers identified is the prolonged implementation of low interest rate policy. This, coupled with the savings glut in the world economy has led to sub-prime lending in the US, as it was used to finance the US mortgage debts. The author indicates that some new lessons have been learnt from the current financial crisis, the most important of them being the need for retooling the finance and economics models. Further, globalization, along with its bestowed benefits, brings in increased frequency and spread of financial and economic crises.
Multidimensionality of US Financial Crisis of 2007–2009
2015
A financial crisis of 2007–09 which started in advanced nation such as United States intersected with the freezing financial markets of the world economies and the suspended global trade, thereby transmuting into a global recession of intense gravity. The objective of this paper is to analysis the causes leading to such intense financial crisis which has hit the world at large. The leading indicators of financial crisis were securitization of mortgages, loose monetary policy stance adopted by the Federal Reserve, Basel norms which incentivized the investments in the mortgages, sovereign debt and GSE-sponsored mortgage backed securities more than the commercial and corporate loans, the rating agencies which awarded the lowest risk, high return ratings such as AAA to these assets, the inflationary pressure, substantial deregulation of the financial sector, bad computer modelling were the additional causes which helped in spreading the contagion of financial crises.
The dynamics of global financial crises
2002
This paper presents a Markov chain model of the transmission of financial crises. Using bilateral trade data and a measure of exchange market pressure, a method to determine a set of transition probabilities that describes the crisis transmission dynamics is developed. The dynamics are characterized by one-month conditional crisis probabilities and the probability of a crisis occurring within one year. The framework allows for modeling and comparing various channels of contagion, such as investments and bilateral trade. Using macroeconomic data on 45 countries, the model predicts and gives insights into the following crises:
IMF Working Papers, 2010
This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF. The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate. This paper investigates whether financial crises are alike by considering whether a single modeling framework can fit multiple distinct crises in which contagion effects link markets across national borders and asset classes. The crises considered are Russia and LTCM in the second half of 1998, Brazil in early 1999, dot-com in 2000, Argentina in 2001-2005, and the recent U.S. subprime mortgage and credit crisis in 2007. Using daily stock and bond returns on emerging and developed markets from 1998 to 2007, the empirical results show that financial crises are indeed alike, as all linkages are statistically important across all crises. However, the strength of these linkages does vary across crises. Contagion channels are widespread during the Russian/LTCM crisis, are less important during subsequent crises until the subprime crisis, where again the transmission of contagion becomes rampant.