Introduction: The Nature of Conflict and Conflict Resolution (original) (raw)
https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024701.N1
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
Bercovitch, Kremenyuk, Zartman “Introduction” Bercovitch, Kremnyuk, and Zartman eds. The Sage Handbook of Conflict Resolution (Sage, London: 2009) pp. 1-12
Related papers
Chapter 4 - Conflict Resolution: The Key Ingredients
Achieving Peace and Security in a World of Turmoil: An Arduous Challenge for the OIC, 2019
[Selected chapters from SESRIC's Achieving Peace and Security in a World of Turmoil: An Arduous Challenge for the OIC coordinated by Mr. Fadi Farasin]. Cite as: Qureshi, T. (2019). Conflict management: The key ingredients [Chapter 4]. In SESRIC, Achieving Peace and Security in a World of Turmoil: An Arduous Challenge for the OIC (pp. 39-66). Ankara: SESRIC. Retrieved from https://www.sesric.org/files/article/659.pdf Abstract While inter-state conflicts continue to be a rare occurrence in the 21st century, there has been a rise in the number of internal conflicts and internationalized internal conflicts. A large number of such conflicts are based on group-based grievances resulting from inequality, exclusion, and a sense of injustice. The shift in the nature of conflicts is also reflected in the way institutions and actors (local, national, regional, and international) deal with conflicts. Ideally, successful conflict management should result in a total resolution of the issues causing the conflict partly due to a change in behavioural factors. However, what is more common is for conflicting parties to reach a settlement such as ceasefire or legal or customary peace agreement. In any case, conflict management is primarily concerned with the ending of a conflict (even if it is temporary), identifying and tackling the root causes of conflicts, and restructuring of institutions, including the redistribution of resources. There are a range of policies, instruments and strategies that are a part of conflict management. The choice of particular policy, instrument or strategy employed to manage conflict is largely at the discretion of the parties to the conflict – albeit somewhat influenced by the surrounding conditions. In light of this, this chapter is dedicated to the key ingredients and the methods most commonly associated with the management of conflicts.
The Dynamics of Conflict Resolution
We all are of two minds about conflict. We say that conflict is natural, inevitable, necessary, and normal, and that the problem is not the existence of conflict but how we handle it. But we are also loath to admit that we are in the midst of conflict. Parents assure their children that the ferocious argument the parents are having is not a conflict, just a "discussion." Organizations will hire facilitators to guide them in strategic planning, goal setting, quality circles, team building, and all manner of training, but they shy away from asking for help with internal conflicts. Somehow, to say that we are in conflict is to admit a failure and to acknowledge the existence of a situation we consider hopeless.
Examining history and evolution of contemporary conflict resolution
Drawing on the insights of a variety of academic disciplines and traditions, contemporary conflict resolution, since its beginning, has shown its development and expansion in terms of theories and practical methods. This paper examines the history and evolution of contemporary conflict resolution since 1960’s.
Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution
Journal of Developing Country Studies
Purpose: Conflict management indicates in the first instance the perspective of the so called ―third party (a mediator, conflict advisor, conflict manager, or supervisor), which is called to help, or engages itself after its own incentive, in order to assists to both conflict parties (and eventually one of them). One can speak about conflict dealing also when during the conflict both parties look for a consensual solution, without asking for an external assistance. The forms of approaching and dealing with conflicts could be of very different nature. Methodology: The research was purely qualitative. Desktop literature review was conducted. Critical analysis of the literature was conducted. Findings: The study found out that most strategies incorporate a range of peaceful measures like negotiations, mediation or facilitation, as well as coercive measures as military, political or economic sanctions including the threat with them (power mediation). While latter measures usually are of...
Conflict-Free Conflict Resolution
This paper provides a nascent developmental model of conflict resolution and explores how such a model challenges theorists and practitioners in the field of conflict resolution to engage with the concept of unity. The developmental model states that the ways in which human beings understand, approach, and attempt to resolve conflicts can be analogized to the developmental stages of infancy, childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. Further, the model argues that conflict resolution can occur in four modes-S-Mode (Self-Centered); A-Mode (Authoritarian); P-Mode (Power Struggle); and C-Mode (Consultative Mode). Each of these modes corresponds to a particular nature of conflict resolution which, respectively, may be survival based, force based, power based, or unity based. The authors suggest that the C-Mode remains largely unexplored, and that conflict resolution is primarily constructed and understood today according to the dynamics of the A-Mode and P-Mode. The key to exploring the C-Mode is to analyze the concept of unity and its implications for both conflict resolution theory and practice.
What makes conflict resolution possible?
Negotiation Journal, 2002
Much of the negotiation literature emphasizes dispute resolution process, seemingly based on the assumption that resolution is indeed possible in a rational environment. The author outlines the history of transformations in social and political thought that have led to this shared assumption. However, the rationality assumption is seriously challenged in the contemporary era by terrorists and others who predicate their actions on a moral certitude that justifies their actions, no matter what the costs. Interveners perhaps should place more emphasis on changing the environment in which disputes occur, so that resolution is at least a possibility.
Cited by
Çatişma Yöneti̇mi̇ Mi̇ Yoksa Çatişma Çözümü Mü?: Bariş Müzakere Süreci̇ne Teori̇k Olarak Yaklaşmak
Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi
Günlük hayatın doğal bir parçası olan ve tarafların uyumlaştırılamayan çıkarları nedeniyle yaşadıkları mücadele olarak tanımlanan çatışmaların, özellikle Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde artış gösteren iç silahlı çatışmalara dönüştüğü görülmektedir. İçinde bulunduğumuz yüzyılda da Dünya'nın farklı coğrafyalarında yaşanan iç silahlı çatışmalar ise çatışma ve barış araştırmaları evrelerinin tümünü kapsayan çatışma yönetiminin bir alt evresi olan çatışma çözümüne ve çatışma çözümünün aşamalarından biri olan barış müzakere süreçlerine alan açmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel odak noktasına çatışma yönetimi ve çatışma çözümü kavramları konularak barış müzakere süreçlerine teorik olarak yaklaşılmaktadır. Bu yönde bir çalışma oluşturulmasının temel amacı ise hassas bir aşamayı temsil eden barış müzakere süreçlerinin kavramsal ve teorik çerçevesini oluşturmaktır. Öte yandan, iç silahlı çatışmalar özelinde çatışmayı sona erdirme amacıyla tarafların etkileşimini ifade eden barış müzakere süreçlerinin, barış araştırmaları literatürü çerçevesinde hangi üst başlık altında kavramsallaştırıldığı analiz edilmektedir. Bu bağlamda çatışma analizi ve barış araştırmaları literatüründe çatışma çözümü ve yönetimi kavramlarının bir üst başlık olarak mı kullanılması gerektiği yoksa barış süreci ekseninde ayrı bir süreci mi ifade ettiği hususu ele alınmaktadır.
Reconciliation as a political discourse in Thailand’s current conflicts
Why do the Thai governments fail in solving a political conflict that has occurred since 2005 and maintaining peace through conducting a reconciliation process? This article answered this question through an assessment of how the term reconciliation has been defined and used by the Thai governments and political leaders during the past decades. This article argues that reconciliation in the Thai language is a term that has been dynamically interpreted, explained, and applied differently by policy makers, scholars, activists, and leaders of the conflicting groups. Several times, such an interpretation, explanation, and appliance have made this term a means to defeat the people of conflicting groups instead of a means of reconciling the society. The Thai old style of reconciliation, especially enacting laws to enforce peace and to use a coup in order to stop violence, is still implemented by political leaders. As a result, the political conflicts in this country sometimes have been paused but have never been solved until the present.
Related papers
CONF 210-002: Theories of Conflict Analysis and Conflict Resolution
Welcome to Theories of Conflict Analysis and Conflict Resolution. The aim of our work for this semester is to provide you with an overview of the theoretical foundations relevant for understanding contemporary forms of violence and social conflict, as well as the potential for nonviolent conflict resolution. Conflict resolution as a field of knowledge and practice is assembled from a range of disciplines and subfields. As a result, students must learn to navigate this interdisciplinary terrain which pulls its theoretical insights from a number of intersecting areas of study, including history, philosophy, psychology, anthropology, and sociology. CONF 210 builds from material encountered in CONF 101 and is intended to strengthen your comprehension of the relationship between conflict resolution theory, practice, and research. The course is designed to develop and bolster your analytical skills not only as an observer of other people's actions, but also as a critical observer of your own thought process. The course is divided into two parts. During the first half of the semester we will read what I consider core texts for apprehending the foundations of conflict theory and more generally, our modern predicament. History reveals that the world has not always been this way, and therefore, a different future is possible. In a period of continual wars and threats of violence it is important to consider how we arrived at the present moment. The texts we will cover in the first part of the term are intended to push you outside of your comfort zone and challenge you to consider the complexities of violence as a social phenomenon; or to put it more directly, we will read material that reflects the seriousness of the times. The second half of the course deals with the transition from a more general analysis of our condition to the specific, in this case how we use (and at times abuse) of theory within the field of conflict analysis and resolution. We will explore key theories relevant to the field including basic human needs, social identity, culture, and power, as well as connect theory to the practices of negotiation, mediation, and problem-solving workshops. Questions that will guide us over the term: 1. Why is theory important and how do I use theory to analyze social situations? 2. How is reading theory different than scrolling through my twitter feed? 3. How do I evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a particular theory? 4. How do I talk about theory to other humans and have them understand me?
Scholars, noting the growing scale and cost of human conflict, have begun to look intently for solutions to this problem through several mediums. On a macro scale, these researchers are focusing on the continuous rise of social conflicts, among other factors, and a growing knowledge in science and technology, particularly in its application to weaponry. On a micro level, it is clear that conflict resides in homo sapiens’ everyday actions. The more conflict increases, so too the efforts of mankind to explain and manage it. This paper seeks to outline the definition and concept of what theory and conflict are. It will look next at a few of these theories, attempting to explain how these theories can assist in a better understanding of how conflicts can be resolved.
Conflict Resolution: The Need of the Hour Approaches And Strategies
Conflict has been an inherent phenomenon in the world since the very beginning. However, it is only in recent times that the conceptualisation of conflict has begun. The inception of conflict, the management of conflict and the resolution of conflict is a matter of scholarly study especially after the end of the cold war. Intrastate conflicts defined in terms of ethnicity are becoming very prominent. Communities are mobilised around their ethnicities and they are politicised. Ethnicity by itself does not lead to conflict. It is when they are used for elite gains that conflict becomes inevitable. Thus the study of conflict and its various dimensions becomes a very significant aspect of study. This paper attempts to understand not just the concept of conflict but also discusses certain strategies for conflict resolution. Tackling incompatibilities is a very important challenge faced by state systems. The state has to at the outset determine whether conflict has to be managed or they have to move beyond management and seek its resolution as well. If resolution of conflicts is the ultimate aim then peace keeping, peace making and peace building are the strategies that can be implemented. Conflict management is the primary approach and conflict resolution is the ultimate approach that the state has to adopt.
Perspectives on Conflict Resolution
2019
I examine two paradigms that have informed the large and growing literature on conflict resolution. The first, the Believer paradigm, draws from liberal ideas and values, and argues that conflicts are best remedied by way of negotiation, democracy, and markets. The second, the Skeptic paradigm, draws from political realism, and argues that conflicts can be managed only through authority or allowing belligerents to fight to exhaustion. This examination reveals the contrasting—even contradictory—assumptions about the means by which conflict should be understood and remedied. The lack of consensus says that not only experts and practitioners do not sufficiently understand their subject matter but that they are unable to conceptualize complexity in ways that will produce peace.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.