Temporary Measures: The Production of Illegality in Costa Rican Immigration Law (original) (raw)
Related papers
Within the South-South migration framework, this specific case study provides an ethnographic view on the specific border of the Rio San Juan, in Nicaragua. Histories of undocumented migrants going from Nicaragua to Costa Rica are here presented taking into consideration three moments of migrations, namely the before, the crossing and the after. This research will investigate specifically irregular migration of people taking into consideration several relevant notion and academic debates. First of all, this study will present the notion of the right to escape, presented by Mezzadra, which points out that subjective and objective reasons have to be taken into account on migration studies. Secondly, I will analyze the specific Southern border of the Rio San Juan where people have created several blind-points, in order to reach Costa Rica irregularly. An in depth analysis on the border will be presented by presenting migrants journeys and my experience with them. Finally, I will analyze several issues Nicaraguans have to face on the other side of the border, when they live there without legal documents. In particular, the racism issue will be presented with the division normally called the “us and them”. Moreover, there will be an analysis on the academic debates on citizenship, such as the cosmopolitan citizenship and the right to migrate, presented by Vitale as the Ius Migrandi.
Fearing the “Nicas”: Perceptions of Immigrants and Policy Choices in Costa Rica
Latin American Politics and Society, 2018
Do attitudes toward immigrants shape public policy preferences? To answer this question, this article analyzes a prominent example of South-South migration: the Nicaraguan immigrant community in Costa Rica. Over the past two decades, Costa Rica has experienced extensive socioeconomic changes, and Nicaraguans have been frequent scapegoats for the fears and worries generated by these changes. Relying on the 2014 AmericasBarometer survey, this analysis finds that respondents who perceive immigrants as an economic threat are significantly more supportive of punitive crime control policies. Attitudes toward immigrants were also significantly linked to support for government policies to reduce income inequality. However, given the historically strong support for the Costa Rican social welfare state, attitudes toward immigrants did not significantly affect support for government services.
Legal Violence: Immigration Law and the Lives of Central American Immigrants
This article analyzes how Central American immigrants in tenuous legal statuses experience current immigration laws. Based on ethnographic observations and over 200 interviews conducted between 1998 and 2010 with immigrants in Los Angeles and Phoenix and individuals in sending communities, this study reveals how the convergence and implementation of immigration and criminal law constitute forms of violence. Drawing on theories of structural and symbolic violence, the authors use the analytic category “legal violence” to capture the normalized but cumulatively injurious effects of the law. The analysis focuses on three central and interrelated areas of immigrants’ lives—work, family, and school—to expose how the criminalization of immigrants at the federal, state, and local levels is not only exclusionary but also generates violent effects for individual immigrants and their families, affecting everyday lives and long-term incorporation processes.
“Shifting in” state sovereignty: social policy and migration control in Costa Rica
This paper challenges the globalist claim that nation states lose sovereignty to normative frameworks of international human rights with regards to their migration policy. In contrast, the analysis of the interplay between migration and social policy in Costa Rica shows that states may find inventive ways to maintain control over its migration policy and remain central in the granting of social rights to immigrants and their actual access to social policy. Indeed, Costa Rica has shifted in its migration control, by giving the country’s emblematic and praised social security and healthcare institution, the Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, a pivotal role in immigrants’ regularization process, thereby creating barriers to healthcare benefits for immigrants. As such, the state remains central in processes of social integration, while citizenship and migratory status continue to be key determinants for immigrants’ access to national welfare benefits.
Liminal Legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan Immigrants’ Lives in the United States
This article examines the effects of an uncertain legal status on the lives of immigrants, situating their experiences within frameworks of citizenship/belonging and segmented assimilation, and using Victor Turner’s concept of liminality and Susan Coutin’s legal nonexistence. It questions blackandwhite conceptualizations of documented and undocumented immigration by exposing the gray area of liminal legality and examines how this inbetween status affects the individual’s social networks and family, the place of the church in immigrants’ lives, and the broader domain of artistic expression. Empirically, it draws on ethnographic fieldwork conducted among Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and Phoenix from 1989 to 2001. The article lends support to arguments about the continued centrality of the nationstate in the lives of immigrants.