Effects of classification context on categorization in natural categories (original) (raw)
Related papers
Are Our Students Taxonomically Challenged or Not?
Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 2009
is not surprising as one important skill that has helped humans survive thus far on Earth is their uncanny ability to discern similarities and discontinuities in the natural world (Raven et al. 1971). Humans have used this ability to partition the natural world into related categories that serve to guide their inferences about the world (Lopez et al. 1997). While we may ponder if this particular endowment is an evolved instinct or a learned process, the general consensus is that categorization is a fundamental human cognition process that constantly takes place in the human mind (Coley et al. 1997). It is through this cognition process that humans construct categories that, according to one school of thought, reflect the universal structure of the natural world (Berlin 1992), and another school the conceptual view of the person doing the categorization (Atran 1990). A middle ground then is the view that categories are products of the interplay between the human mind and the natural environment (Lopez et al. 1997, Medin et al. 1997). While categorization may be a skill that we practice every day (Ashby & O'Brien 2005), the same cannot be said of the naming of things unless we include the occasional naming of filenames on our computers. However, this does not imply that assigning
Classification in well-defined and ill-defined categories: evidence for common processing strategies
Journal of experimental psychology. General, 1980
Early work in perceptual and conceptual categorization assumed that categories had criterial features and that category membership could be determined by logical rules for the combination of features. More recent theories have assumed that categories have an ill-defined structure and have prosposed probabilistic or global similarity models for the verification of category membership. In the experiments reported here, several models of categorization were compared, using one set of categories having criterial features and another set having an ill-defined structure. Schematic faces were used as exemplars in both cases. Because many models depend on distance in a multidimensional space for their predictions, in Experiment 1 a multidimensional scaling study was performed using the faces of both sets as stimuli, In Experiment 2, subjects learned the category membership of faces for the categories having criterial features. After learning, reaction times for category verification and typ...
2016
Category learning is ubiquitous in science education. From botany courses teaching to identify different types of plants to geology courses teaching to distinguish various types of rocks, examples of category learning being a core of a course curriculum can be easily found. Using the educationally authentic rock categories, the current project examined whether category learning at a broad level (i.e., distinguishing between Igneous, Sedimentary, and Metamorphic rocks) could be enhanced by using category information at a more specific level (e.g., Harzburgite under Igneous, Breccia under Sedimentary, etc.). Both in Experiment 1 (broad-and specificlevel information were presented simultaneously) and Experiment 2 (specific-level categories were learned separately from specific-and broad-level category names association), direct training at the broad level was superior to the protocol combining the specific-level category information.
Categorization: The View from Animal Cognition
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2016
Exemplar, prototype, and rule theory have organized much of the enormous literature on categorization. From this theoretical foundation have arisen the two primary debates in the literature-the prototype-exemplar debate and the single system-multiple systems debate. We review these theories and debates. Then, we examine the contribution that animal-cognition studies have made to them. Animals have been crucial behavioral ambassadors to the literature on categorization. They reveal the roots of human categorization, the basic assumptions of vertebrates entering category tasks, the surprising weakness of exemplar memory as a category-learning strategy. They show that a unitary exemplar theory of categorization is insufficient to explain human and animal categorization. They show that a multiple-systems theoretical account-encompassing exemplars, prototypes, and rules-will be required for a complete explanation. They show the value of a fitness perspective in understanding categorizati...
Further attempts to clarify the importance of category variability for categorisation
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2012
The issue of how category variability affects classification of novel instances is an important one for assessing theories of categorization, yet previous research cannot provide a compelling conclusion. In five experiments we reexamine some of the factors which are thought to affect participant performance. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants almost always classified the test item as belonging to the high-variability category. By contrast, in Experiment 3 we employed an alternative experimental paradigm, where the difference in variability of the two categories was less salient. In that case, participants tended to classify a test item as belonging to the low-variability category. Two additional experiments (4 and 5) explored in detail the differences between Experiments 1, 2 on the one hand, and 3 on the other. Some insight into the underlying psychological processes can be provided by computational models of categorization, and we focus on the continuous version of Anderson's (1991) Rational Model, which has not been explored before in this context. The model predicts that test instances exactly halfway between the prototypes of two categories should be classified into the more variable category, consistent with the bulk of empirical findings. We also provided a comparison with a slightly reduced version of the Generalized Context Model (GCM) to show that its predictions are consistent with those from the Rational Model, for our stimulus sets.
Object categorization is an important research topic not only in the field of biology but also in psychology. So far, however, the mental principles guiding categorization in biology have not been systematically investigated from the viewpoint of psychology. We focused our study on the shape-based categorization processes of decapod crustaceans, incorporating the perspectives of both disciplines in order to shed more light on this phenomenon. Thus, in parallel to the investigation of the principles of morphology-based categorization of decapods, we examined the mental representations of the concepts of crustaceans and the development of these representations in human memory. For this purpose, we created a set of standardized and modularized images of decapod crustaceans consisting of a series of morphed exemplars of crabs and lobsters, which served as a stimulus basis for investigating category judgments. The images were ordered linearly on a continuum changing from a 'crab' to a 'lobster' pole by systematically manipulating certain categorization-relevant features like the shape of the carapace and the angle of the claws. This precisely controlled material allowed us to systematically investigate the influence of qualitative and quantitative changes in specific features of decapods on people's category judgments. Moreover, we also analyzed how different levels of biological expertise and prior knowledge influence the aforementioned processes. We conducted a psychological experiment by using a cognitive performance test with groups of biology students at different stages of expertise as well as naïve non-experts. Our results show that category judgments in the case of crustaceans specifically depend on the morphological, shape-based form information in the presented image but not on the degree of prior knowledge about the to-be-categorized material. Thus, the form information is robust and dominant across different levels of expertise. These current findings allow conclusions about the nature of categorization processes for decapod crustaceans and the impact of perception-guided formation of mental concepts in human memory. This underlines the need to combine methodological and conceptual knowledge from biology and psychology to understand the principles of categorization as a research topic in scientific investigations.