Enterprise Transformation: Beyond the Agency Perspective, Economics Systems 24 (4), p. 396-399. (original) (raw)

Editorial - Enterprise Restructuring and Sources of Competitive Advantage in Transforming Economies

Journal of East European Management Studies, 2001

Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.

A theory of enterprise transformation

Systems Engineering, 2005

The information technology revolution has driven the pace of competition and rapid globalization. Consequently, enterprises increasingly need to consider and pursue fundamental changetransformation—to maintain or gain competitive advantage. This need raises important research issues concerning how transformation is best understood and pursued. This paper outlines a theory of enterprise transformation to guide research on these issues. The theory focuses on why and how transformation happens, as well as ways in which transformation is addressed and pursued in terms of work processes and the architecture of these processes. A variety of industry and corporate vignettes is used to illustrate the theory. A portfolio of research initiatives are discussed in terms of how they can advance the proposed theory, while also enhancing practices of enterprise transformation. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 8: 279–295, 2005

An Introduction to the Special Issue of Journal of Enterprise Transformation : Enterprise Change and Continuity

Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2011

Enterprise transformation is usually construed as large-scale change. Is change the opposite of continuity? Is continuity the same as stability? These are important questions, particularly to those seeking to implement enterprise transformation, because they stake out the intellectual territory and inform the questions and challenges that the enterprise must address. Are change and continuity seen as forces that compete for energy and mind-share during transformative processes? Is there a view that change and continuity are required, that they do not really compete, especially if they alternate? These are some of the questions we address in this special issue.

Special Issue Organization Theory and the Post-Socialist Transformation, edited by Anna Soulsby and Ed Clark

2000

This study discerns and analyses contradictory narrative voices within a local enterprise in the troubled Balkan region, recently acquired by a multinational enterprise. We employ case study research methods informed by semi-structured interviews with management and worker representatives to expose underlying and conflicting rationalities relating to the upgrading of technological and work systems, as a management-led response to growing market

Firm transformation: advancing a Darwinian perspective

2005

Purpose–The paper advocates a Darwinian explanation of the process of firm transformation. Existing but generally opposing views related to the selection-adaptation debates are united to consider the dialogic nature of both approaches. It is argued that a Darwinian approach, as opposed to a neo-Darwinian or Lamarckian approach, provides the means to scale the sides of a debate that has for too long divided scholars interested in firm and industry transformation.