Enriching Rational Choice Institutionalism for the Study of International Law (original) (raw)
Related papers
U. Ill. L. Rev., 2008
would like to thank Stefan Voigt for helpful critique. 1 See for an explanation as well as an empirical examination on the relevance of Law and Economics at European Law Schools Oren Gazal-Ayal, "Economic Analysis of Law and Economics", 35 Cap. U. L. Rev. (forthcoming fall 2007); http://ssrn.com/abstract=901164\. 2 This was one reason for the symposiums organizers to hold the discussion on International Law and Economics in Europe in order to mitigate misunderstandings and discuss the potential as well as the potential limits of economic analysis in the area of public international law. 6 As Niklas Luhmann, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, 34-41(1998) himself stated, system theory does not even intend to empirically validate its descriptions. For social scientists, as economists, trained in the tradition of critical rationalism of a Popperian kind, that difficult to accept as a scientific approach.
The Institutional Problem in Modern International Law
Attached is an introduction to the forthcoming volume R. Collins, The Institutional Problem in Modern International Law (Hart, 2016) Abstract Modern international law is widely understood as an autonomous system of binding legal rules. Nevertheless, this claim to autonomy is far from uncontroversial. International lawyers have faced recurrent scepticism as to both the reality and efficacy of the object of their study and practice. For the most part, this scepticism has focused on international law’s peculiar institutional structure, with the absence of centralised organs of legislation, adjudication and enforcement, leaving international legal rules seemingly indeterminate in the conduct of international politics. Perception of this ‘institutional problem’ has therefore given rise to a certain disciplinary angst or self-defensiveness, fuelling a need to seek out functional analogues or substitutes for the kind of institutional roles deemed intrinsic to a functioning legal system. The author of this book believe that this strategy of accommodation is, however, deeply problematic. It fails to fully grasp the importance of international law’s decentralised institutional form in securing some measure of accountability in international relations. It thus misleads through functional analogy and, in doing so, potentially exacerbates legitimacy deficits. There are enough conceptual weaknesses and blindspots in the legal-theoretical models against which international law is so frequently challenged to show that the perceived problem arises more in theory than in practice.
How international law works: a rational choice theory
Choice Reviews Online
My name is Louise Gibbons and I am the Editor-in-Chief of the Berkeley Journal of International Law. Thank you all for coming. Today, we are having a panel on Professor Andrew Guzman's book "How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory." Our moderator is Professor Buxbaum of Berkeley Law. We will be publishing the discussion today, as well as a book review written by Harlan Cohen of the University of Georgia, in BJIL's upcoming issue this spring. I would like to extend a special thanks to the Miller Institute for Global Challenges and Law at Berkeley Law for sponsoring this event as well as to our journal's book review editor, Kate Apostolova, for planning today's discussion. So, with that, I think we will just go ahead and get started and let Professor Buxbaum introduce the panelists. Thanks for coming.
Saving institutional benefits: Path dependence in international law
2008
This project considers the pace of change in international law, focusing on sources of evolution and stagnation. I attempt to determine why negotiators defer to existing law in some situations and not others. To that end, this study explores country preferences towards the status quo in international negotiations.
The choice of international institutions: Cooperation, alternatives and strategies
American Political Science Association annual …, 2005
We develop a framework that explains the choice of institutions to address international cooperation problems. We begin with boundedly rational actors who make institutional choices based on the properties of the cooperation problem they face and the menu of international institutions available to them. If the institutional status quo offers an appropriate venue for the prevailing cooperation problem, then actors will either use a focal institution or select a readily available alternative; if no suitable venue is available in the institutional status quo then costlier and riskier strategies of institutional change and creation will be pursued. The framework further allows us to incorporate international organizations as actors affecting the menu for institutional choice, to combine elements of rationalist and constructivist institutional accounts, and to address distributional and power considerations inherent to the choice of international institutions. A set of empirical articles follows and builds on this framework to advance our understanding of the choice of institutions in different international issues.
Public International Law and Economics Symposium Introduction
2007
It is a commonplace that we live in an era of increasing international interdependence, in which there has been a proliferation of international law and international organizations. Yet our understanding of the workings of international law has not kept pace. While we have a good deal of work on international law doctrine, our analytic tools are much weaker, and we are far from anything approaching a science of institutional design. We are therefore ill prepared to advise policy makers in the project of developing effective tools to solve transna-tional problems, and to provide global public goods. The contributions to this special issue, though they involve a wide range of different approaches and topics, share a commitment to using the core methodological assumptions of the rational choice approach in seeking to answer important question in International Law. The papers published in this issue were first presented at a conference at the Max-Planck Institute for Research on Collect...