626 Does Neoadjuvant Sorafenib Treatment Affect Microvessel Density Count in Prostate Cancer? (original) (raw)

Molecular markers and mortality in prostate cancer

BJU International, 2007

ambulatory care during 1989-90 at nine Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centres in New England, 1274 had incident prostate cancer during 1991-95. We obtained the medical records and diagnostic tissue for these men, and then extracted demographic data and clinical information, and conducted immunohistochemical assays of molecular markers in biopsy tissue, as potential prognostic factors. In this interim analysis, data on 250 patients were analysed; the main outcome was overall mortality to 31 December 2003, providing 8-13 years of follow-up. RESULTS In 228 (91%) patients with available medical record and laboratory data, the median age was 72 years and the median prostate-specific antigen level was 10.4 ng/mL. In adjusted (multivariate) analyses that included traditional prognostic factors, bcl-2 staining (hazard ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.27-3.58, P = 0.004) and high microvessel density (1.76, 1.19-2.60; P = 0.005) had an independent effect on the outcome. CONCLUSIONS Bcl-2 and microvessel density are independent predictors of subsequent death among men with prostate cancer and might have a clinical role in assisting in deciding on treatment.

Bio-Clinical Parameters with a Predictive Role in Advanced Prostate Cancer

2021

Background: Advanced forms of prostate cancer include a heterogeneous group of patients with an uneven prognosis. The lack of consensus on a precise definition of this group of patients prevents clinical decision-making and adequate patient counseling. Methods:In this retrospective study, we investigated a series of preoperative bio-clinical parameters (age, patient comorbidities, tumor clinical stage, serum PSA, preoperative Gleason score, the neutrophil / lymphocyte ratio value and hormonal profile of patients), in relation to some postoperative parameters (histopathological type of tumor, tumor pathological stage, postoperative Gleason score, extra-prostatic extension, positive margins, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, positive lymphadenopathy), in a group of 96 patients with radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2016 and 2020, for a better understanding of the behavior of the disease and adequate counseling of patients proposed for RP.Results: Of all the clinical and ...

Molecular Markers and Death From Prostate Cancer

Annals of Internal Medicine, 2009

Background: Current methods to assess the prognosis of prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis are limited. Objective: To determine whether molecular markers of cell cycle regulation (bcl-2 and p53) and angiogenesis (␤-3 integrin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and microvessel density) are associated with increased long-term risk for death among men with prostate cancer.

Microvessel Density as a Predictor of PSA Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2000

Whether prostate cancer recurrence can be predicted by microvessel density (MVD) measurements is controversial. One reason for the lack of agreement may be the differing antibodies used to determine MVD. We evaluated MVD using 2 different antibodies against endothelial cells, CD31 and CD34, on 102 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy without adjuvant hormonal therapy. The tumors from these cases were identified, and areas with the highest Gleason pattern were immunostained. Average MVD determined by CD31 (MVD/CD31) staining was significantly lower than that obtained by MVD/CD34 staining (60.1 vs 80.3). By using Kaplan-Meier analysis, prostatespecific antigen (PSA) recurrence was correlated with MVD/CD31 and MVD/CD34. MVD/CD34 and MVD/CD31 were associated strongly with PSA recurrence on a univariate level. However, only MVD/CD34 was an independent predictor of PSA failure. Therefore, some of the confusion about MVD value as a prognostic indicator may be due to the antibodies used.

1074 Microseminoprotein-beta expression in different stages of prostate cancer

European Urology Supplements, 2016

Microseminoprotein-beta (MSMB, MSMB) is an abundant secretory protein contributed by the prostate, and is implicated as a prostate cancer (PC) biomarker based on observations of its lower expression in cancerous cells compared with benign prostate epithelium. However, as the current literature on MSMB is inconsistent, we assessed the expression of MSMB at the protein and mRNA levels in a comprehensive set of different clinical stages of PC. Immunohistochemistry using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against MSMB was used to study protein expression in tissue specimens representing prostatectomies (n = 261) and in diagnostic needle biopsies from patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (n = 100), and in locally recurrent castration-resistant PC (CRPC) (n = 105) and CRPC metastases (n = 113). The transcript levels of MSMB, nuclear receptor co-activator 4 (NCOA4) and MSMB-NCOA4 fusion were examined by qRT-PCR in prostatectomy samples and by RNA-sequencing in benign prostatic hyperplasia, PC, and CRPC samples. We also measured serum MSMB levels and genotyped the single nucleotide polymorphism rs10993994 using DNA from the blood of 369 PC patients and 903 controls. MSMB expression in PC (29% of prostatectomies and 21% of needle biopsies) was more frequent than in CRPC (9% of locally recurrent CRPCs and 9% of CRPC metastases) (p<0.0001). Detection of MSMB protein was inversely correlated with the Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens (p = 0.024). The read-through MSMB-NCOA4 transcript was detected at very low levels in PC. MSMB levels in serum were similar in cases of PC and controls but were significantly associated with PC risk when adjusted for age at diagnosis and levels of free or total PSA (p<0.001). Serum levels of MSMB in both PC patients and controls were significantly associated with the rs10993994 genotype (p<0.0001). In conclusion, decreased expression of MSMB parallels the clinical progression of PC and adjusted serum MSMB levels are associated with PC risk.

Microvessel density in prostate cancer: lack of correlation with tumor grade, pathologic stage, and clinical outcome

Urology, 1999

Objectives. Angiogenesis is believed to play an important role in tumor progression and metastasis. Previous studies have suggested that the microvessel density (MVD) of prostate tumors may be of prognostic value. This study investigated the reliability of assessing MVD in radical prostatectomy specimens and its value as an independent prognostic indicator in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Methods. One hundred radical prostatectomy specimens from 1993 to 1995 were randomly selected for this study. Thirteen cases were excluded because the patients had undergone neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or tissue blocks were unavailable. The median follow-up time was 36 months. Tumor blocks were immunostained using the endothelial-specific antibody CD31. MVD was counted in areas with the greatest microvessel immunostaining, which were designated "hot spots." MVD was analyzed for associations with clinical and pathologic factors. In a subset of 60 cases, the same observer repeated the counts three times. Results. Intraobserver reliability for MVD counting was excellent (reliability coefficient 0.82), demonstrating that this method could be reproduced by a single observer. MVD was not associated with Gleason sum, tumor stage, surgical margin status, or seminal vesicle invasion. Of the 87 patients, 20 (23%) had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure during a 36-month median follow-up time. As expected, Gleason sum and tumor stage were strong predictors of PSA failure, with risk ratios of 2.1 and 2.3, respectively. In contrast, MVD was not associated with PSA failure. Conclusions. MVD, as determined by CD31, can be reliably measured by a single observer, but it is not a useful prognostic indicator for men with clinically localized prostate cancer. UROLOGY 53: 542-547, 1999.

Microseminoprotein-Beta Expression in Different Stages of Prostate Cancer

PLOS ONE, 2016

Microseminoprotein-beta (MSMB, MSMB) is an abundant secretory protein contributed by the prostate, and is implicated as a prostate cancer (PC) biomarker based on observations of its lower expression in cancerous cells compared with benign prostate epithelium. However, as the current literature on MSMB is inconsistent, we assessed the expression of MSMB at the protein and mRNA levels in a comprehensive set of different clinical stages of PC. Immunohistochemistry using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against MSMB was used to study protein expression in tissue specimens representing prostatectomies (n = 261) and in diagnostic needle biopsies from patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (n = 100), and in locally recurrent castration-resistant PC (CRPC) (n = 105) and CRPC metastases (n = 113). The transcript levels of MSMB, nuclear receptor co-activator 4 (NCOA4) and MSMB-NCOA4 fusion were examined by qRT-PCR in prostatectomy samples and by RNA-sequencing in benign prostatic hyperplasia, PC, and CRPC samples. We also measured serum MSMB levels and genotyped the single nucleotide polymorphism rs10993994 using DNA from the blood of 369 PC patients and 903 controls. MSMB expression in PC (29% of prostatectomies and 21% of needle biopsies) was more frequent than in CRPC (9% of locally recurrent CRPCs and 9% of CRPC metastases) (p<0.0001). Detection of MSMB protein was inversely correlated with the Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens (p = 0.024). The read-through MSMB-NCOA4 transcript was detected at very low levels in PC. MSMB levels in serum were similar in cases of PC and controls but were significantly associated with PC risk when adjusted for age at diagnosis and levels of free or total PSA (p<0.001). Serum levels of MSMB in both PC patients and controls were significantly associated with the rs10993994 genotype (p<0.0001). In conclusion, decreased expression of MSMB parallels the clinical progression of PC and adjusted serum MSMB levels are associated with PC risk.

Expression of biomarkers modulating prostate cancer progression: implications in the treatment of the disease

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2005

Objectives: To determine whether COX-2, bcl-2 and neoangiogenesis are related to human prostate cancer relapse after definitive surgical treatment and progression toward androgen independence and to evaluate the association between the patterns of these tumoral biomarkers and other standard clinico-pathological parameters (such as Gleason score, PSA, TNM stage). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records on 126 prostate cancer samples from patients treated at our University Hospital from 1995 to 2002. The 72 patients with clinically localized disease (group 1) had undergone radical prostatectomy. Another 54 patients (group 2) had metastatic androgen-independent disease. Archived material relating to the subjects was then immunostained for bcl-2, COX-2 and CD-31, using an anti-bcl-2 monoclonal primary antibody, an anti-COX-2 polyclonal rabbit antibody and an anti-CD-31 monoclonal mouse antibody to evaluate neoangiogenesis (MVD, microvessel density). Results: We found that bcl-2, COX-2 and MVD expression increased from group 1 to group 2. The intergroup difference was significant only for high MVD (Po0.05). On the other hand, high MVD, high bcl-2 and high COX-2 expression was correlated with a higher PSA level (Po0.01), whereas only a high MVD was also related with Gleason score (Po0.05). We used univariate analysis to evaluate the prognostic impact of biologic and clinico-pathologic parameters on the diseasefree-survival of 72 patients treated by radical prostatectomy. A total of 30 patients (41.6%) experienced biochemical relapse; bcl-2, COX-2 and MVD significantly correlated with disease relapse in these patients. In fact, we observed disease relapse in 24/45 (53%) with high bcl-2 expression, in 15/21 (71%) with a high MVD count and finally, in 30/58 (52%) with high COX-2 expression. Finally, PSA value and Gleason score were the only two biologic markers significantly associated to disease relapse in a multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our results strongly support a role for bcl-2, COX-2 and angiogenesis in the development and progression of prostate cancer. Of course, we are aware of the small sample size considered in our study. Further investigations would better clarify the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these findings.

Biomarkers for evaluation of prostate cancer prognosis

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2015

Prostate cancer, with a lifetime prevalence of one in six men, is the second cause of malignancy-related death and the most prevalent cancer in men in many countries. Nowadays, prostate cancer diagnosis is often based on the use of biomarkers, especially prostate-specific antigen (PSA) which can result in enhanced detection at earlier stage and decreasing in the number of metastatic patients. However, because of the low specificity of PSA, unnecessary biopsies and mistaken diagnoses frequently occur. Prostate cancer has various features so prognosis following diagnosis is greatly variable. There is a requirement for new prognostic biomarkers, particularly to differentiate between inactive and aggressive forms of disease, to improve clinical management of prostate cancer. Research continues into finding additional markers that may allow this goal to be attained. We here selected a group of candidate biomarkers including PSA, PSA velocity, percentage free PSA, TGFβ1, AMACR, chromogran...