Rethinking Journalism Again: Towards a Functional Perspective on Journalism's Role and Relevance (original) (raw)
Related papers
Factors Transgressing Journalism’s Contemporary Mission and Role
RUDN JOURNAL OF STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND JOURNALISM, 2022
This discussion article envisages five different contemporary challenges and pays special attention to the arguments as to why contemporary journalism losses its professional priorities and gets mixed in with other types of mass communication, particularly with public relations (PR) and propaganda. This clarification is of great importance not only for purely professional purposes, but also for broad social priorities. Arguments concerning the role and mission of journalism place it anywhere between watchdog and lapdog which makes the process of studying journalism uncertain and even contradictory as it is caught between the binds of historical values and the traps of contemporary practice.
Iamcr 2007 World Congress, 2007
In today's public information landscape, it seems to be increasingly difficult to draw a clear line between what is and what is not journalism (even if it appears as such). Under this cover, a lot of different practices are being developed in the wide field of communication, raising complex questions about what specifically defines journalism -whether it is carried out by formally recognized professionals or media companies, or by other kind of individuals and groups who now have easy access to public communication instruments (Internet sites, weblogs…) and commit themselves to gather, handle and diffuse some kind of information in the public sphere.
(2015) Revising the Traditional Model of Journalism in the Context of Digital Media
With the advent of new media, the question what constitutes legitimate journalism has been hotly debated. In fact, the controversy was raised more than three decades ago as a reaction to the intensifying commercialization of news industry and the subsequent tabloidization of news. In media scholarship there are various competing delineations of journalism: as a cultural artifact, an occupational practice, an ethical orientation in reporting, or a set of stylistic properties in writing (Jones and Salter 2012). This critical review article acknowledges this diversity and validates standards that distinguish professional reporters, whose role in a democracy cannot be overrated. However, it argues that since journalistic practices have been transformed, if not revolutionized, so should the conceptual bases of media scholarship and the general understanding of the nature of journalism. It posits embracing the model of remediation rather than intermediation for a more appropriate representation of the current state of journalism.
Journalism is changing – and what about journalism ethics?
Iamcr 2013 Conference, 2013
Major changes have been challenging journalism in the last two decades, in the context of the 'digital age'. The technological possibilities developed in the 'information society', together with the social and cultural trend for more participation, opened this field to new actors, which caused professional journalists to lose their traditional monopoly of searching, gathering, editing and diffusing news in the public sphere. At the same time, these new possibilities of communicating are increasingly forcing the old actors to play new roles in the media. The digital techniques and the Internet gave birth to a big diversity of new media and of new forms of dealing with journalism and public information. 'Citizen journalism', 'participatory journalism', 'user-generated content', 'crowdsourcing', 'weblogs',' Twitter', 'Facebook', etc., are words and expressions rather common these days, all of them somehow calling the attention to the fact that journalism-as-a-professional-activity seems to coexist more and more with various forms of journalismas-a-civic-activity, performed by very different people, under very different conditions and with very different levels of involvement and expertise. As a consequence, questions are being raised about the ethical implications of this new scenario, both in what regards the activity of professional journalists in new (online) media and the active commitment of 'laypersons' in the process of gathering, editing and diffusing information. In this paper we will try to analyze and to discuss these questions, with reference, among others, to Eliot Freidson (2004) and his distinction between 'practice ethics' and 'institutional ethics'. Furthermore, we'll try to discuss what really makes journalism distinctive from other practices that nowadays coexist with it in the public sphere, strongly increasing the possibilities of communication between people but not necessarily following the purposes of public interest and of civic democratic participation. In this context, the concept of journalism seems to ask for a clearer definition, and so do the roles to be played by journalists in the more complex (but also more stimulating) media environment we are dealing with in contemporary societies.
The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered
2016
This collection of original essays brings a dramatically different perspective to bear on the contemporary "crisis of journalism." Rather than seeing technological and economic change as the primary causes of current anxieties, The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered draws attention to the role played by the cultural commitments of journalism itself. Linking these professional ethics to the democratic aspirations of the broader societies in which journalists ply their craft, it examines how the new technologies are being shaped to sustain value commitments rather than undermining them. Recent technological change and the economic upheaval it has produced are coded by social meanings. It is this cultural framework that actually transforms these "objective" changes into a crisis. The book argues that cultural codes not only trigger sharp anxiety about technological and economic changes, but provide pathways to control them, so that the democratic practices of independent journalism can be sustained in new forms. jeffrey c. alexander is a leading social theorist who helped create the contemporary field of cultural sociology. He has written and edited dozens of books, among them The Meanings of Social Life, Trauma: A Social Theory, Performance and Power, The Civil Sphere, The Dark Side of Modernity, and Obama Power (with Bernadette Jaworsky). His books and articles have won various national and international awards. elizabeth butler breese is a sociologist who works with highgrowth technology and education companies. She has published media, public sphere, and celebrity research in several sociology and communications journals and has been called on to comment on social media trends in The New York Times, Wired, and AdAge. She is currently Marketing Director at Panorama Education. maría luengo is Associate Professor of Journalism at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, where she teaches and conducts research in the areas of media theory and journalism. Her work interprets developments at the nexus of social trends and movements, gender, migration, and journalistic culture and practice. She has published widely in the fields of journalism and media studies and co-authored Periodismo social (Social Journalism) with Juana Gallego (Síntesis 2014). Her research has appeared in Journalism Studies, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, Communication & Society, and Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, among others.
Understanding journalism as newswork: How it changes, and how it remains the same
Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 2008
For a media profession so central to society's sense of self, it is of crucial importance to understand the influences of changing labour conditions, professional cultures, and the appropriation of technologies on the nature of work in journalism. In this paper, the various strands of international research on the changing nature of journalism as a profession are synthesized, using media logic as developed by 1991) and updated by Dahlgren (1996) as a conceptual framework. A theoretical key to understanding and explaining journalism as a profession is furthermore to focus on the complexities of concurrent disruptive developments affecting its performance from the distinct perspective of its practitioners -for without them, there is no news.