What happened in Barendrecht? What happened in Barendrecht? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from the dutch CCS case barendrecht
Energy Procedia, 2011
To date, hardly any field study results are available on responses from lay people in communities that are confronted with the possibility of a local CO2 storage project. This paper describes one of the first of such studies, presenting a case description of an onshore CCS demonstration project in Barendrecht, the Netherlands. The aim of this study is twofold. First, we provide an indepth analysis of the development of public awareness of an onshore CCS demonstration project in Barendrecht, the Netherlands. Second, by analyzing practices and outcomes, and by linking these to existing knowledge about stakeholder involvement and public communication, we identify a set of conditions for effective communication and involvement strategies. Findings indicate that one important cause of the lack of local acceptance of the project was the absence of a cohesive and timely involvement strategy for discussing the project with local stakeholders as part of the formal decision-making process rather than apart from it. The paper concludes with a list of recommendations for stakeholder involvement in future CCS operations.
Public acceptance challenges for onshore CO2 storage in Barendrecht
Energy Procedia, 2011
At the request of the Dutch government Shell has been preparing for a possible CO 2 storage project in the town of Barendrecht since 2007. The project involves transport and storage of pure CO 2 produced at the Shell Pernis refinery (a by-product from hydrogen production) through 20 km of pipeline and into two depleted gas fields. Because this is a densely populated area public acceptance was recognised from the start as the key challenge for the project. This paper will describe the key elements of a comprehensive public acceptance strategy, and also a frank analysis of what went well and what didn't go well on the Barendrecht project.
2010
6 turned out to be more important than technical information on the project detail or risk assessment. This is not to imply that hazards and risks of environmental and health and safety impacts are not of concern to communities. It does suggest, however, that the sense of empowerment enjoyed by a community -that is, the degree to which it has a 'voice' which is heard by the powerful ('those in charge') -has a strong influence over its willingness to embrace unknown technologies.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012
This paper reports on a public opinion survey designed to examine how the local public thought about a proposed CCS demonstration project in Barendrecht, the Netherlands. The survey was administered to a large sample of the Barendrecht population (N = 811) shortly before it was decided to cancel the project. The results indicate that most residents were rather negative about the CCS project and found it an important issue. Furthermore, most residents thought it was unsafe to transport and store CO 2 in the region and thought it was very likely that the project would cause a fall in local property value. These beliefs only partially explained the mostly negative public attitudes. Socio-political factors also contributed significantly to negative attitudes among the local public: Most residents perceived the decision-making process as unfair and mistrusted those who would decide about whether or not to proceed with the project. They further felt that project developer Shell and the national government-parties that were trusted less than the Barendrecht town council and the local activist group "CO 2 isNee"-had too much influence in the decision-making process and that the people of Barendrecht had too little influence. Implications and challenges for future CCS projects are discussed.
Key Messages for Stakeholders and Public on CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS)
The International Energy Agency (IEA) was established in 1974 within the framework of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to implement an international energy programme. The IEA fosters co-operation amongst its 28 member countries and the European Commission, and with the other countries, in order to increase energy security by improved efficiency of energy use, development of alternative energy sources and research, development and demonstration on matters of energy supply and use. This is achieved through a series of collaborative activities, organised under more than 40 Implementing Agreements. These agreements cover more than 200 individual items of research, development and demonstration. IEAGHG is one of these Implementing Agreements.
Public Responses to CO2 Storage Sites: Lessons from Five European Cases
Energy & Environment, 2012
Studies of the factors involved in public perceptions of CO2 storage projects reveal a level of complexity and diversity that arguably confounds a comprehensive theoretical account. To some extent, a conceptual approach that simply organises the relevant social scientific knowledge thematically, rather than seeking an integrated explanation, is as useful as any single account that fails to do justice to the contingencies involved. This paper reviews and assembles such knowledge in terms of six themes and applies these themes to five European cases of carbon capture and storage (CCS) implementation. We identify the main factors involved in community responses to CCS as relating to: The characteristics of the project; the engagement process; risk perceptions; the actions of the stakeholders; the characteristics of the community, and the socio-political context.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021
Who wants North Sea CCS, and why? Assessing differences in opinion between oil and gas industry respondents and wider energy and environmental stakeholders Abstract Whilst Scotland and the wider UK is making good progress with research and development towards deployment of offshore carbon capture and storage, there is increasing divergence in opinion on the necessity of CCS for meeting climate change targets. Oil and gas operators appear optimistic about the technical feasibility of CCS; whereas civil society and NGOs are increasingly vocal in their scepticism towards the necessity of CCS in a net-zero society. Given that operators' expertise may be required to support offshore CO2 storage given their subsea experience, and that civil society is important in shaping government and public opinion, this divergence may be a challenge to offshore CCS deployment in the UK and elsewhere. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the grounds on which oil and gas operators' views on CCS differ from a wider range of stakeholders, through a survey and in-depth interviews. Our results show that people with more knowledge of CCS are more likely to support its deployment, and that strong belief in anthropogenic climate change is loweralbeit rising-among oil and gas respondents. Our results also show concern that the net-zero transition may have negative effects for carbon-intensive regions, and that storage expertise is the UK's strongest skill set for CCS deployment. We suggest that across a range of stakeholders, the value of CCS is thus most likely to lie in specific applications (e.g. hydrogen) and/or very specific localities (e.g. places with existing subsurface knowledge and skills), rather than widespread deployment as a mitigation technology. Keywords Carbon capture and storage; just transition; North Sea; offshore CCS; oil and gas Highlights • Offshore CCS research & development making good progress in Scotland and wider UK; • Yet differing views between oil and gas developers and civil society on CCS; • Survey and interview research explores differences between stakeholders; • Respondents more familiar with CCS tend to see it as more necessary for mitigation; • CCS most likely to find stakeholder support for specific and/or localised uses. Acknowledgements The analysis and writing up of the data on which this paper is based was supported by the EPSRCfunded HyStorPor project (EP/S027815/1) on which second author Leslie Mabon is a Co-Investigator.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014
We analyze the decision-making process of the abandonment of a Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) initiative in the Northern-Netherlands. We investigate the social acceptance of the Northern-Netherlands CCS initiative using the results from a survey among the key stakeholders. We find that local opposition can only be held partially responsible for the abandonment of the CCS project. This result differs from the broadly accepted notion "no local public acceptance, no CCS". Our study finds that the views from key stakeholders regarding the prospects of the CCS initiative were conflicting and this played a role in abandoning the initiative. We conclude that the way in which responsibilities between key stakeholders were arranged has had a dominant impact on the level of acceptance. We recommend that future policy and policy instruments for subsurface activities, like CCS, should be designed in accordance with the object, subject and inter-subject dimension of the decision-making process. In addition there should be a strategic framework, which accounts for the interaction between social-political, market and community acceptance.