Symbolism of Flaubert’s Stuffed Parrot in Un coeur simple and Woolf's "cosmogony" in her Letters (original) (raw)

Abstract

In “On Re-reading Novels,” Woolf takes Flaubert’s Un coeur simple as an example in order to show that “the ‘book itself’ is not form which you see, but emotion which you feel” (E VI, 427). She states that two intense sentences — “[a] sudden intensity of phrase” — in Flaubert’s tale, which function as “a flash of understanding” or “these moments of understanding”, not only suggest his two “different intention[s]” in this tale but also control the reader’s observations in their reading (E VI, 426). Woolf’s remarks on the suggestive and symbolic meanings of these two sentences in Flaubert’s tale is reminiscent of her own statement in a letter written on 25 August 1929 to Hugh Walpole: “but I have a cosmogony, nevertheless,—indeed all the more; and it is of the highest importance that I should be able to make you exist there, somehow, tangibly, visibly; recognisable to me, though not perhaps to yourself” (L IV, 84). As her letters, essays and diaries show, Woolf possesses an admiration for Flaubert’s writing. Accordingly, my paper aims to first clarify what Woolf means in the word, “cosmogony” in her letter, then examine the relation between this “cosmogony” and affection, as well as explore the similar symbolism of Félicité’s stuffed parrot and Woolf’s “cosmogony” or the device of symbolism that Woolf herself as a writer “inherits, bends to [her] purpose, models anew, or invents for [herself]” (E VI, 430) from this French writer, as she indicates in the conclusion of this essay. The discussion will focus on Woolf’s letters, in particular, some of her letters to Violet Dickinson, Jacques Raverat, Vita Sackville-West, as well as Ethel Smyth.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (41)

  1. des siennes, et que l'Artiste ne doit pas plus apparaître dans son oeuvre que Dieu dans la nature. L'homme n'est rien, l'oeuvre tout ! Cette discipline […] est une sorte de sacrifice permanent que je fais au Bon Goût. […] / […] Je me suis toujours efforcé d'aller dans l'âme des choses, et de m'arrêter aux généralités les plus grandes, et je me suis détourné, exprès, de l'Accidentel et du dramatique. Pas de monstres et pas de Héros ! », Gustave Flaubert, Correspondance, p. 664-5).
  2. See Laurence M. Porter. ed. Preface. A Gustave Flaubert Encyclopedia. Westport, Connecticut & London: Greenwood Press, 2001: p. vii.
  3. See Laurence M. Porter, Preface, p. viii. Porter's view echoes some critics' opinions in The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert (2004), where Timothy Unwin states: "Flaubert has preoccupied almost every generation of writers since the mid-nineteenth century" (Timothy Unwin. ed. "Gustave Flaubert, the hermit of Croisset," The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: p. 1); while Alison Finch shows: "In both his practice and his theory, Flaubert is incontestably one of those writers who have shaped the modern view of 'good prose writing'. His stylistic sensitivity and adventurousness have had an enormous influence on literature both inside and outside France" (Alison Finch. "The stylistic achievements of Flaubert's fiction," The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Ed. Timothy Unwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: p. 162).
  4. See Alison Finch, "The stylistic achievements of Flaubert's fiction," p. 162-3: "Virginia Woolf and James Joyce model their delicate and multilayered writing to some degree on Flaubert's;" and Mario Vargas Llosa. "Flaubert, our contemporary," The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Ed. Timothy Unwin. Trans. John King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: p. 222: "The genius of Proust, of Joyce, of Virginia Woolf, of Kafka and of Faulkner would have not been possible without the lesson of Flaubert." See also Geoffrey Wall's view on Flaubert's influence in the introduction to Three Tales. Trans. Roger Whitehouse. London: Penguin Books, 2005, p. xxix-xxx.
  5. Ben Hutchinson. Modernism and Style. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011: p. 39, 110.
  6. J. A. Cuddon. The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory (1977). Penguin Books, 2014: p. 699.
  7. See J. A. Cuddon, The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory (1977), p. 701.
  8. Thomas Carlyle. "Symbols," Sartor Resartus (1833-1834). Boston, U.S.A., and London: Ginn & Company, Publishers, 1897: p. 198-9.
  9. Eugène Goblet D'Alviella. Preface. The Migration of Symbols (1891). Westminster: Archibald Constable and Co., 1894: p. 6-7.
  10. Eugène Goblet D'Alviella argues that "[b]y Symbolism the simplest, the commonest objects are transformed, idealized, and acquire a new and […] an illimitable value," while "[t]o create a myth" is "to catch a glimpse of a higher truth behind a palpable reality" (Eugène Goblet D'Alviella, Preface, p. 2-3).
  11. See Arthur Symons. Introduction. The Symbolist Movement in Literature (1899). Revised and enlarged edition. New York: E. P. Dutton & Company, 1919: esp. p. 1-3.
  12. See Arthur Symons, Introduction, esp. p. 3, 7, 9.
  13. "On Re-reading Novels" was first published in 1922, and its undated revision was posthumously published by Leonard Woolf in The Essays of Virginia Woolf, Volume VI: 1933-1941. Ed. Stuart N. Clarke. London: Hogarth Press, 2011: p. 423-32. All the quotations in this article are from the revised version.
  14. See Virginia Woolf, The Essays of Virginia Woolf, Volume VI: 1933-1941, p. 426: "The mistress and the maid are turning over the dead child's clothes. 'Et des papillons s'envolèrent de l'armoire.' The Francis Steegmuller. 2 nd printing. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1980.
  15. The Letters of Gustave Flaubert, 1857-1880. Selected, edited and translated by Francis Steegmuller. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.
  16. Un coeur simple (1877). Éd. Samuel S. de Sacy. « Folio classique ». Paris : Gallimard, 2015.
  17. Barnes, Julian. Flaubert's Parrot. London: Jonathan Cape, 1984.
  18. Finch, Alison. "The stylistic achievements of Flaubert's fiction," The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Ed. Timothy Unwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: p. 145-64.
  19. Israel-Pelletier, Aimée. "Flaubert and the visual," The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Ed. Timothy Unwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: p. 180-95.
  20. Morris, Jean. "Félicité," A Gustave Flaubert Encyclopedia. Ed. Laurence M. Porter. Westport, Connecticut & London: Greenwood Press, 2001: p. 122-24.
  21. Porter, Laurence M. ed. Preface. A Gustave Flaubert Encyclopedia. Westport, Connecticut & London: Greenwood Press, 2001: p. vii-ix.
  22. Unwin, Timothy. ed. The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  23. ---. ed. "Gustave Flaubert, the hermit of Croisset," The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: p. 1-13.
  24. Vargas Llosa, Mario. "Flaubert, our contemporary," The Cambridge Companion to Flaubert. Ed. Timothy Unwin. Trans. John King. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: p. 220-4.
  25. Wall, Geoffrey. Introduction. Three Tales. Trois Contes (1877). Trans. Roger Whitehouse. London: Penguin Books, 2005: p. xi-xxx.
  26. Virginia Woolf "On Re-reading Novels," The Essays of Virginia Woolf, Volume VI: 1933-1941. Ed. Stuart N. Clarke. London: Hogarth Press, 2011: p. 423-32.
  27. The Diary of Virginia Woolf, Volume Five: 1936-1941. 1984. Ed. Anne Olivier Bell and Andrew McNeillie. 1 st Harvest edition. San Diego, New York, London: A Harvest Book, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1985.
  28. The Letters of Virginia Woolf, Volume I: 1888-1912. 1975. Ed. Nigel Nicolson and Joanne Trautmann. 1 st American edition. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.
  29. The Letters of Virginia Woolf, Volume III: 1923-1928. 1977. Ed. Nigel Nicolson and Joanne Trautmann. 1 st American edition. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978.
  30. The Letters of Virginia Woolf, Volume IV: 1929-1931. 1978. Ed. Nigel Nicolson and Joanne Trautmann. 1 st American edition. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1979.
  31. The Letters of Virginia Woolf, Volume V: 1932-1935. 1979. Ed. Nigel Nicolson and Joanne Trautmann. 1 st American edition. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1979.
  32. The Letters of Virginia Woolf, Volume VI: 1936-1941. 1980. Ed. Nigel Nicolson and Joanne Trautmann. 1 st American edition. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980.
  33. The Essays of Virginia Woolf, Volume VI: 1933-1941. Ed. Stuart N. Clarke. London: Hogarth Press, 2011.
  34. Ke, Lingxiang. Virginia Woolf's Letters: Writing in the Making. Ph.D thesis. France: University of Paul-Valéry (Montpellier 3), 2015. Website: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01281085/document iii). Symbolism and others
  35. Carlyle, Thomas. "Symbols," Sartor Resartus (1833-1834). Boston, U.S.A., and London: Ginn & Company, Publishers, 1897: p. 197-205.
  36. Cuddon, J. A. The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory (1977). Penguin Books, 2014.
  37. D'Alviella, Eugène Goblet. Preface. The Migration of Symbols (1891). Westminster: Archibald Constable and Co., 1894: p. 1-9.
  38. Hutchinson, Ben. Modernism and Style. Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
  39. Murphet, Julian. "Fiction and postmodernity," The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century English Literature. Ed. Laura Marcus and Peter Nicholls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: p. 716-35.
  40. Symons, Arthur. The Symbolist Movement in Literature (1899). Revised and enlarged edition. New York: E. P. Dutton & Company, 1919.
  41. ---. Introduction. The Symbolist Movement in Literature (1899). Revised and enlarged edition. New York: E. P. Dutton & Company, 1919: p. 1-9.