Bond strength between fibre posts and composite resin cores: effect of post surface silanization (original) (raw)
Brazilian Dental Journal, 2012
This study evaluated the effect of air drying temperature and different silane coupling agents on the bond strength between glass fiber posts and composite resin core. The post surface was cleaned with alcohol and treated with different silane coupling agents, being three prehydrolyzed silanes [Silano (Angelus), Prosil (FGM), RelyX Ceramic Primer (3M ESPE)] and one two-component silane [Silane Coupling Agent (Dentsply)]. Two post-silanization air drying temperatures, 23°C and 60°C, were applied. A cylindrical plastic matrix was placed around the silanized post and filled with composite resin. Each bonded post provided 7 slices for push-out testing. Each slice was loaded to failure under compression at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Scott-Knott tests (α=0.05). Dunnett's test was used to compare the mean of the control group with that of each experimental group. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate the interface of the fractured slices. For the 23°C air drying temperature, the use of RelyX Ceramic Primer resulted in significantly lower bond strength than the other silane coupling agents, while the bond strength with Silane Coupling Agent was the highest of all groups. Only with Silane Coupling Agent, the bond strength for the 23°C air drying temperature was significantly higher than that for 60°C air drying. In conclusion, the use of warm air drying after silane application produced no increase in the bond strength between the fiber-reinforced composite post and the composite core. The twocomponent silane produced higher bond strength than all prehydrolyzed silanes when it was used with air drying at room temperature.
Bond Strength of Resin Composites used as Core Materials around Different Types of Fiber Posts
International Journal of Experimental Dental Science, 2012
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of two resin composites around different types of fiber posts. Twenty post specimens were prepared for three types of fiber posts. Posts were embedded in acrylic resin blocks with half of the post diameter exposed. The exposed portions of the posts were successively ground with silicon carbide paper until flattened flush with the acrylic resin, to create a standard smooth surface. All the posts were treated with a single silane coupling agent layer. After silane application, the posts were gently air dried. Three types of fiber posts were randomly divided into two groups, according to the resin composite used. The light-cured composite resins were placed in a polytetrafluoroethylene mold positioned over the post specimens and they were polymerized. Shear bond strength values (MPa) of posts and composite resin cores were measured using an universal test machine. Twoway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test ...
2012
PURPOSE. Debonding of a composite resin core of the fiber post often occurs at the interface between these two materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber posts and composite core. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty-four fiber posts were picked in two groups (Hetco and Exacto). Each group was further divided into four subgroups using different surface treatments: 1) silanization; 2) sandblasting; 3) Treatment with 24% H2O2, and 4) no treatment (control group). A cylindrical plexiglass matrix was placed around the post and filled with the core resin composite. Specimens were stored in 5000 thermal cycles between 5℃ and 55℃. Tensile bond strength (TBS) test and evaluation using stereomicroscope were performed on the specimen and the data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Post Hoc Scheffe tests and Fisher's Exact Test (α =.05). RESULTS. There was a significant difference between the effect of different surface treatments on TBS (P<.001) but different brands of post (P=.743) and interaction between the brand of post and surface treatment (P=.922) had no significant effect on TBS. Both silanization and sandblasting improved the bonding strength of fiber posts to composite resin core, but there were not any significant differences between these groups and control group. CONCLUSION. There was not any significant difference between two brands of fiber posts that had been used in this study. Although silanization and sandblasting can improve the TBS, there was not any significant differences between surface treatments used. [
The Saudi Dental Journal, 2020
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
EFFICACY OF A COMBINED SILICA/METHACRYLATE COUPLING ON THE FIBER POST BONDING TO COMPOSITE CORES
Objectives. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of surface pre-treatments on different fiber posts when bonded to composite cores. Methods and Materials. Conventional (DT Light Post, VDW) and pre- coated quartz fiber posts (DT Light SL, VDW) were tested. Chemical surface treatments included: 1. silanization (Monobond-S; Ivoclar-Vivadent); 2. adhesive application (Prime& Bond NT; DeTreyDentsply); 3. silane + adhesive application; 4. no treatment was performed on the surface of both types of posts. A flowable composite was used for build-up (X-Flow; Dentsply). Specimens were cut into microtensile sticks that were loaded under tension (cross-head speed 0.5 mm/min) until failure. Bond strength data were statistically analyzed with two- way ANOVA and Tukey tests for post-hoc comparisons (a = 0.05). The morphology of the post/core interface was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results. Post surface treatment influenced the bond strength (p
Dental Materials Journal, 2007
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of post surface conditioning with adhesive systems on tensile bond strength between two composite resin core systems and FRP posts (ER DentinPost). Forty-eight posts were trimmed at the coronal part, and the upper part of 3 mm was covered with a standardized composite resin core build-up. Twenty-four posts were treated with the respective adhesive systems. Four groups were formed: G1-ClearfilCore; G2-Clearfil New Bond ＋ ClearfilCore; G3-MultiCore Flow; and G4-AdheSE ＋ MultiCore Flow. Mean (SD) bond strengths in MPa were 7.53 (0.89) for ClearfilCore and 8.08 (0.93) for New Bond ＋ ClearfilCore; 5.80 (0.39) for MultiCore Flow and 5.92 (0.43) for AdheSE ＋ MultiCore Flow. ClearfilCore achieved significantly higher bond strengths than MultiCore Flow (two-way ANOVA; p<0.0001). In conclusion, composite resin core materials exerted a significant influence on tensile bond strength, while adhesive systems did not significantly affect the results.
Journal of endodontics, 2007
This study evaluated the tensile bond strengths and the effect of silanization of fiber posts inserted with different adhesive systems. Sixty DT Light Posts (size 1) were used. Thirty posts were pretreated with silane. The posts were cemented into form-congruent artificial root canals (12 mm) of bovine dentine. Six groups were formed: G1, Prime&Bond NT/Calibra; G2, Monobond-S+Prime&Bond NT/Calibra; G3, ED Primer/Panavia 21ex; G4, Monobond-S+ED Primer/Panavia 21ex; G5, RelyX Unicem; and G6, Monobond-S+RelyX Unicem. The mean (standard deviation) tensile bond strengths (megapascals) were 7.69 (0.85) for G1, 7.15 (1.01) for G2, 6.73 (0.85) for G3, 6.78 (0.97) for G4, 4.79 (0.58) for G5, and 4.74 (0.88) for G6. G1 achieved significantly higher bond strengths than G3 and G5; G3 had significantly higher values than G5 (P < .05; Scheffé procedure). Silanization had no significant effect (P > .05, one-way analysis of variance). Tensile bond strengths were significantly influenced by th...
The journal of adhesive dentistry, 2006
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strengths between various resin composites used as core materials (Multicore Flow, Ivoclar-Vivadent; Tetric Flow, Ivoclar-Vivadent; Filtek Flow, 3M-ESPE; Tetric Ceram, Ivoclar-Vivadent; Filtek Z250, 3M-ESPE), and an FRC post (FRC Postec Plus, Ivoclar-Vivadent) by means of the microtensile nontrimming technique. Five experimental groups were used. For the microtensile nontrimming technique, 45 to 50 beam-shaped specimens per group were obtained from cylinders of core material, which had been built up around the post by progressively adding small increments of composite resin. Each specimen was loaded in tension until failure at either one of the two post/core interfaces present in each stick. The differences in interfacial bond strength amongthe groups were tested for statistical significance with the one-way ANOVA test, followed by the Dunnett test for post-hoc comparisons. The measured bond strengths in MPa were 17.29 +/- 6.02 for FRC+...
Effect of silanization on bond strengths of fiber posts to various resin cements
Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985), 2007
To investigate the effects of pretreatment (silanization) on bond strengths between 3 different types of fiber posts and 4 resin cements, respectively. Prefabricated quartz-fiber (Unicore Post, Ultradent) and prefabricated glass-fiber (FRC Postec, Ivoclar Vivadent) posts with a cross-linked polymer matrix and individually formed glass-fiber posts with an interpenetrating polymer network (IPN Post, Stick Tech) (n = 160 each) were inserted into resin composite disks (2 mm thick) using the following resin cements and silane solutions: Panavia F/Porcelain Bond Activator (Kuraray), PermaFlo DC/Silane (Ultradent), Variolink II/Monobond S (Ivoclar Vivadent) and RelyX Unicem/Espe Sil (3M Espe). Nonsilanated posts served as controls. The push-out bond strengths were determined before (n = 10) and after (n = 10) thermocycling (2,000 cycles, 5 degrees C to 55 degrees C, dwelling time 30 seconds). Bond strengths (mean [SD]) were significantly affected by the resin cement (P < .001), the pret...