Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony By Ismet Akca, Ahmet Bekmen & Baris Alp Ozden (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Neoliberal Landscape And The Rise Of Islamist Capital In Turkey
Research and Policy on Turkey, 2016
Party (JDP) – takes advantage of Europe to recall the Ottoman past. Thus it is argued that there is a parallel in the discursive acts of the both sides and one of the main critiques of the work is that both reduce what is political and social to cultural and civilizational. Moreover, it was also emphasized that the reforms of the JDP did not result in a structural change in the attitudes of the Sunni-Turkish majority towards the acceptance of other groups in Turkish society. Discussions are grounded through the major challenges to the traditional state structure of modern Turkey, namely the Alevi question, the Kurdish question and the headscarf issue and a key strength of the book is that arguments are supported by findings from the in-depth interviews with individuals from relevant social groups. The book makes a considerable contribution on questioning the concept of tolerance in Turkish society in the context of Europeanization and rightfully entitles it only as a ‘myth’ but not ...
The Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics, 2022
This chapter traces the multiple trajectories of neoliberal politics in Turkey from 1980 on ward by putting economic and sociological dynamics of neoliberalism in dialogue with ethnographic and anthropological analyses of its political configurations. The first two sections trace the two formative moments of neoliberal politics in Turkey as responses to the crisis conjunctures of the 1970s and 1990s. These sections provide an account of ne oliberal politics informed by class struggles at the macro-historical level. The subsequent two sections analyze the same historical periods at the level of micropolitics from two perspectives: (a) the formations of violence characterizing the enactment of neoliberaliza tion processes, and (b) the subjective processes through which neoliberalism harnesses economies of desire. The final section returns to the macro-historical level and offers crit ical reflections regarding the direction of the economic politics that is emerging as the in stitutional architecture of neoliberal governmentality is being dismantled under Erdoğan's "new Turkey."
The ‘Harmonization’ of Islam with the Neoliberal Transformation: The Case of Turkey
2014
The end of the Cold War brought about a great uncertainty in relation to the geopolitical order. The prevalence of this neoliberal model of development had as a prerequisite the integration of countries other than the traditionally developed and powerful nations of the West. As a consequence, the developing or the less economically developed economies were the ones appearing to acquire 'renewed' importance. A fundamental aspect of these repercussions was the triggering of ideological debates over the compatibility of Islam with this stage of capitalist development. One major axon of these debates was the 'desecularization' of capitalist modernization and the integration of Islam in the new global order. This article examines the case of Turkey in this framework. It analyses how the 'Conservative Democracy' programme of the Justice and Development Party is 'harmonizing' Islam with the transformation of the country and how this transformation is presented with 'local colours', being more acceptable and creating the new hegemony in Turkey.
The Making of Neoliberal Turkey
The Making of Neoliberal Turkey, 2016
Exploring the divergent aspects of the rule of neoliberalism in Turkey since 1980s, each chapter in this book highlights a specific dimension of this socio-economic process and together, these essays construct a thorough examination of the whirlwind of changes recently experienced by Turkish society. With particular focus on the new ways in which social power operates, expert contributors explore new discourses and subjectivities around environmentalism, health, popular culture, economic policies, feminism and motherhood, urban space and minorities, class and masculinities. By questioning the primary influence of the state in these micro-political matters, they engage with concepts of neoliberalism and governmentality to provide a fresh, grounded and analytical perspective on the routes through which social power navigates the society. This sustained examination of the new axes of power and subjectivity, with a particular eye on the formation of new political spaces of governance and resistance, deepens the analysis of Turkey’s experiment with neoliberal globalization.
Islamic Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
Progress in Political Economy, 2019
Most commentators on Turkey mark 2013 as a turning point in terms of the ruling Justice and Development Party's (AKP) transition from a liberal, democratic, and 'yet' pro-Islamic government to a more heavy-handed and authoritarian one. Even in 2010-12, the AKP was praised by some in the mainstream-liberal intelligentsia as a transformative and progressive power that would consolidate democratic values and civil liberties. However, in June 2013, following the Gezi Uprising which started in Istanbul's Taksim Square, the AKP abandoned its progressive role and transformed into a regressive power that rules the country in a more authoritarian manner. The same mainstream-liberal intellectuals then began to question whether the AKP's leader, then-Prime Minister R. T. Erdoğan, is a dictator or not. Such a transformation surprised many and brought both the Gezi Uprising and the AKP under close scrutiny. Gamze Yücesan-Özdemir's edited volume, The Road to Gezi, offers a critical and alternative reading of the Gezi Uprising and it challenges not only the myth of 2013, as the year Erdoğan had turned into an authoritarian leader, but also the hegemonic Islamistsecularist divide as the main reason of the upheaval. In this collection, the contributors collectively argue that the Gezi Uprising did not happen precipitously. Rather, it originated from various working-class movements and different resistance practices of multiple social forces (e.g. women's movements, student movements, movements against urban transformation, social media activism, new forms of journalism, and protests of both blueand white-collar workers). Notably, another anthology was edited by Gamze Yücesan-Özdemir and Simten Coşar and published by the same publisher in 2012. Entitled Silent Violence: Neoliberalism, Islamist Politics and the AKP Years in Turkey, it argued that the articulation of Islamist politics with neoliberal capitalism that defines AKP rule should be understood as the basis of transformation within neoliberal capitalism involving various forms of suppression and exploitation along axes of class, race, and gender. A combined reading of these two volumes provides an original, unique and challenging overview of the political economy of contemporary Turkey since the AKP came into power in 2002.
The Gezi movement that sparked into existence in 2013 must be placed in the context of resistance, identity constitution, and opposition to domestic and globally dominant neoliberal policies. Turkey’s transition to neoliberalism happened by means of a simultaneous reformation of the state and the national economy after the military coup of the 1980s and after a decade of class struggle. The resulting authoritarian democratic regime, according to Nicos Poulantzas a new kind of repressive state apparatus which emerges as a direct result of the current stage of capitalist globalization, implemented policies of labour market deregulation, privatization, and market liberalization that resulted in violent economic conditions on the ground. The coming to power in 2001 of the Justice and Development Party (JDP; in Turkish, AKP) fostered power relations within Turkey’s political economy and accelerated neoliberal transformation with especially severe impacts on the country’s political ecology. As a result, the administration emerged as an overarching postmodern Leviathan. For these reasons, the articles focuses on the increasing colonization of life by market forces as well as the oppressive globality of space over place, of state sovereignty over individual autonomy, and modes of Islamic universality over subaltern pluriversality in Turkey.
World Affairs , 2023
This paper attempts to trace the multiple trajectories of neoliberal politics in Türkiye (Turkey). Focusing on the crisis of secularism, it examines the dialectical relationship between the state, neoliberalism, Islamism and authoritarianism. The integration of liberal market economy norms into an Islamic framework for state reconstruction in Türkiye shows that Islam had long been a part of the political restructuring of the world economy. The paper argues that in order to create a partnership across social classes, the AKP (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi or Justice and Development Party) has reframed an Islamic moral position to meet its Third Way party image. However, the AKP’s pursuit of authoritarian neoliberalism bears certain resemblance to other developing market economies.It is argued that the AKP’s political project embodies spatially and temporally distinct characteristics, fusing long-standing authoritarian institutional structures and practices with neoliberal ideology, potent political alliances, Islamic values and repressive practices that are facing mounting resistance.
The Origins of Turkey’s "Heterodox" Transition to Neoliberalism: The Özal Decade and Beyond
Journal of World-Systems Research Vol.21(2), pp.387-416, 2015
There is a critical literature which explains the rise of neoliberalism as an attempt by the bourgeoisie to countervail the real or perceived threats of the post-war order and to overcome the profitability crisis of the late 1960s and the 1970s by restoring class power in favor of capital. Using this perspective, many scholars have been interpreting the rise of neoliberalism as a global counter-attack against the gains of developmentalist regimes, working classes and the Left. Hence, the question "why and how was neoliberal transformation accomplished, and by whom?" has almost started to receive a uniform answer: "The overall dynamics of capitalism under neoliberalism, both nationally and internationally, [are] determined by new class objectives that worked to the benefit of the highest income brackets, capitalist owners, and upper fractions of management". Examining the origins of Turkey’s neoliberal transformation during the Özal decade, this paper shows that under geopolitical concerns, instead of serving to the benefits of existing bourgeois classes, neoliberal policies may (1) contribute to the development of alternative/rival segments of national bourgeoisie, (2) aim at creating a large middle class society (instead of shrinking them), (3) coexist with populist attempts of redistribution to lower segments of society to co-opt the grievances and anger of the masses, and (4) at the most extreme cases, they may even paradoxically reduce income inequality as well. Turkey's transition to neoliberalism in the post-1980 period encompasses all of these "anomalous" features. To explain how these seeming-anomalies can take place under neoliberalism, I use world-system biography as a methodological tool and examine Turkey's transition to neoliberalism under the "Özal Decade" (1980-1989/93). Our analysis also discusses how and why these “heterodox” features continued to exist during the Erdoğan decade as well.
Consolidating and Contesting Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: Towards a Framework
2022
During the early years of the ruling Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (Justice and Development Party, AKP), Turkey was seen as a burgeoning democratic power propped up by economic prosperity in All authors have contributed equally. The author names are in alphabetical order. The authors would like to thank the Centre for Advanced Middle Eastern Studies and the Strategic Research Area (SRA): Middle East in the Contemporary World (MECW) at Lund University for providing the open-access funding for this chapter.