Never Enter Into Alliance with the Islamists? A Comparative Look at Turkish and Tunisian Islamists' Experiences with Democracy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Trajectories and Accommodations of Democracy and Islam. (c2022)
The Middle East has been going through various changes in the last decade with many parties and regimes identifying as Islamic. While the world is shifting focus to the importance of democracy, this thesis aims to better understand Islam and Democracy's accommodation. It elaborates on the reasons the trajectories adopted by different actors can be dissimilar. In doing so, the thesis examines the different democratic practices embraced by Islamist parties. It tackles the case studies of Turkey’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) and Iran’s Al Khomeini regime after the revolution of 1979. It examines the political, social, and economic pathways of each party. It finds that the different accommodations of democratic practices are directly related to the benefits that these parties receive. It also finds that the Islamic identity of the AKP and Al Khomeini are associated with the support they need in order to maintain the legitimacy of their governments and achieve the hegemony th...
What do we learn from Turkey and Tunisia regarding the relationship between political Islamism and democratization? Variables identified by current research such as autonomy, “moderation”, and cooperation with secular actors can cut both ways depending on various political institutional conditions and prerogatives. Particularly, the article argues that preoccupation with “conquering the state from within as opposed to democratizing it” has been a key priority and intervening variable undermining the democratizing potential of the main Turkish and Tunisian political Islamic actors – primarily the AKP and Ennahda. These actors have prioritized acceptance by and ownership of their respective nation states over other goals and strategies, such as revolutionary takeover or Islamization of the state and confrontations with state elites. This has led to a relative neglect of designing and building institutions, whether for Islamic or democratic transformation. Hence, while contributing to democratization at various stages, these actors have a predisposition to adopt and regenerate, reframe and at times augment the authoritarian properties of their states. Research should ask how secular and religious actors can agree on institutions of vertical and horizontal state accountability that would help to address the past and present sources of the interest of political Islamists in conquering rather than democratizing the state.
Islam/ism and Democracy: Past the Compatibiltiy Problem and towards the Post-Islamist Turn
Illumine: Journal of the Centre for Studies in Religion and Society, 2010
This article addresses of some the shortcomings in the literature on "Islam/ism and democracy" that result from questioning whether Islam/ism and democracy are compatible. I argue, contrary to the compatibility paradigm, that what is important is how Muslims believe in and practice democracy. I examine "post-Islamist" discourses and politics as potential democratizing movements that support an admixture of rights-based claims and Islamic legitimacy. In light of recent popular uprisings in Yemen and Egypt that have followed from the successful ouster of the Ben Ali regime in Tunisia, this article highlights the democratic attitudes throughout the Muslim majority states and the Middle East in particular. I conclude that despite fears of Islamist accessions to power, Islamist participation should be invited as a method of cultivating and furthering democratic political cultures in the Middle East and throughout Muslim majority states.
Islam and Turkey: From Muslim Democracy to Islamist Autocracy?
Faith, Freedom and Foreign Policy: Challenges for the Transatlantic Community, Transatlantic Academy, 2015
In this chapter for a collection on the theme "Religion and the Liberal Order", I investigated whether Turkey is Islamicizing. I argue that it is, but this is neither new nor always a source of illiberal politics. Nevertheless, today, the Turkish leadership is pursuing a policy of polarization with Islamist overtones. This is part of a short-term strategy to win elections, a medium-term strategy to police dissent, and a long-term strategy of raising a presumptively compliant “devout generation” - a process I document empirically via changes to the education system. The danger of the approach is that by suppressing Turkey’s intrinsic diversity it creates fertile ground for ethno-sectarian tensions.
Tunisia's Islamists and the "Turkish Model" (2017)
Journal of Democracy , 2017
Authoritarian regimes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region have historically excluded Islamist parties from the political process, making it difficult to assess assumptions about how they would behave in power, let alone about their potential to stimulate and steward a democratic transition. Until Tunisia’s Ennahda party won elections in 2011, no Islamist party in (or beyond) the MENA region had managed to lead an elected government, with a single exception: Turkey’s Justice and Development party (AKP). While scholars have tended to focus on the regional impact of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, the original Arab Islamist movement, in many ways the Ennahda - AKP comparison is tighter, and therefore more illuminating, than the Ennahda - Muslim Brotherhood comparison. Comparing the AKP and Ennahda, therefore, can help scholars identify how different Islamist parties’ impact on democratization may diverge. Based on interviews in Arabic and Turkish with leaders, activists, and base-level members of Ennahda and AKP, this article examines what-- if anything-- AKP and Ennahda are learning from one another's experiences in power and why.
Middle East Law and Governance
At the beginning of the 2010s, several Arab countries seemed about to follow the model of Turkey, with an electoral victory of Islamist parties in a context of democratization. A decade later, Turkish akp has turned authoritarian, and the Moroccan and Tunisian Islamist parties have lost both access to governmental office and a large part of their electoral appeal. In this context, lessons can be learned from the early failed democratic experience in Algeria (1989–1992), and from the evolution of its Islamist movements since then. From these four case studies, the contributors of this issue investigate the notions of moderation and inclusion, and their interrelations. Their articles build on the current trends within literature by taking into account the variety of Islamist movements, and their incorporation within different national trajectories. These articles contribute to the academic discussion by bringing new facts and ideas regarding this topic of inclusion-moderation.