Stefan A. Riesenfeld, International Law and the University of California (original) (raw)
1998, Berkeley Journal of International Law
AI-generated Abstract
This article reflects on the life and contributions of Stefan Albrecht Riesenfeld, a prominent figure in the fields of international law and comparative law. It highlights his extensive academic career, significant publications, and influential teaching methods. Riesenfeld's research interests are discussed, along with his impact on legal scholarship and education, marking him as a lasting figure in legal history.
Related papers
International Law's Collected Stories
2020
Palgrave Studies in International Relations (the EISA book series), published in association with European International Studies Association, provides scholars with the best theoretically-informed scholarship on the global issues of our time. The series includes cutting-edge monographs and edited collections which bridge schools of thought and cross the boundaries of conventional fields of study. EISA members can access a 50% discount to PSIR, the EISA book series, here http://www.eisa-net. org/sitecore/content/be-bruga/mci-registrations/eisa/login/landing.aspx. Mai'a K. Davis Cross is the Edward W.
The Nature of International Law
2019
This is a treatise on the philosophy of international law. Hence, its successes or failures should be measured primarily by the yardsticks of legal philosophy. Still, its purpose, as in the case of any other work in the area of jurisprudence, is to cast some new light on the legal practice-in this case the international one-and to offer to those working in this practice a fresh perspective on the issues with which they deal on a daily basis. In doing so, legal philosophers are not there "to act as backroom boffins for the law industry." That is, theirs is not "to lay on new ideas or arguments for lawyers any more than philosophers of art are there to provide new ideas or materials for artists." 1 Theirs is to "see legal problems. .. as different problems from those that appear on the face of the law." 2 In that respect, this book aspires to persuade international legal practitioners that it is meaningful to take a deep gaze at old problems with new eyes. This aspiration is far from warranted though. International scholars are not necessarily keen to employ a jurisprudential perspective. Take Brownlie's words from his General Course to the Hague Academy of International Law: "In spite of considerable exposure to theory, and some experience in teaching jurisprudence, my ultimate position has been that. .. theory produces no real benefits and frequently obscures the more interesting questions." 3 It is mainly legal philosophers' fault for the fact that this statement could, until recently, be taken as representative enough of the overall attitude of the international scholarship. With the notable exception of Kelsen, whose legal philosophy is not always easily digestible even for those working in the field, no other 1
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.