Building HCI partnerships and infrastructure (original) (raw)
Related papers
Since invention of the first barn-sized computing giant (one hesitates in calling them computers) until this very day, humans have had to engage in some sort of interaction with them, one way or another. However, shapes and means to this interaction have changed dramatically overtime and keeps changing by month. This relationship has faced many twists and turns in its path, yet always seems to be observed, analyzed and addressed by scientists from different disciplines. During the past decades, many hardworking visionary people have contributed to the formation of the field we know as human-computer Interaction. Thanks to their hard work and continuous research, HCI has always moved hand in hand, if not ahead, with technology and humanity passing through major (and sometimes minor) shifts and leaps. These tectonic changes in visions and understandings can be considered as waves. In this essay I try to outline these waves through the history of human and computer relations and make some semi-wild anticipations of what is to come next.
HCI public policy activities in 2012: a 10-country discussion
2012
Public policy increasingly plays a role in influencing the work that we do as HCI researchers, interaction designers, and practitioners.“Public policy” is a broad term that includes both government policy and policy within non-governmental organizations, such as standards bodies. The Interacting with Public Policy forum focuses on topics at the intersection of humancomputer interaction and public policy.
National and international frameworks for collaboration between HCI research and practice
CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2000
Gerrit van der Veer VU Amsterdam Karel Vredenburg IBM Corporate UCD Willy Wong IPO This workshop will focus on methods of forging ties between industry practitioners and research communities. Furthermore the workshop focuses on the input that is required from government bodies to stimulate this collaboration. Participants will discuss enabling conditions for collaborative projects, based on the various practical research experiences of the participants.
Building An HCI Community In Brazil: Recent Efforts and Initiatives
Proceedings of the INTERACT
In this article we report the state-of-the-art of the HCI field in Brazil. We start with a brief history of the access of institutions and individuals to technology. After that we present some of the efforts done in academia in the 90's to establish the HCI field and to organize the HCI community. We briefly describe the personal profile of the participants of this community and how the field stands in relation to the Brazilian industry and government. Finally we expose our view on how to pursue our goals in the near future. The information here presented reflects mainly the work and experiences done by the participants of a recently established HCI group of interest, whose main interactive medium is the internet. This group has emerged in the academic millieu and has strong links with computer science departments.
How to bring HCI Research and Practice Closer Together
This special interest group probes potential problems between HCI researchers and the practitioners who are consumers of research, to explore the extent of the problems and propose possible solutions. It will start with the results of the CHI 2010 workshop on the same topic, articulating factors that may render some of the research literature inaccessible or irrelevant to practitioners. When should HCI researchers be concerned about the relevance of their work to practitioners? How should practitioners communicate their needs for research? Participants will discuss these topics and others that both groups can use to help bridge the gap between research and practice in HCI.
Challenges of HCI design and implementation
1994
BRAD MYERS is a Senior Research Computer Scientist at Carnegie Mellon University, where he is the principal investigator for the Garnet User Intdace Development Environment and the Demonstrational Intdaces Projtzt. entail.* bam@ cr. cmu. edu etting the user interface right is becoming critical to the success of products, and everyone knows that designing and implementing human-computer interfaces is difficult and time-consuming. But why is this true?
Let's Stop Pushing the Envelope and Start Addressing It: A Reference Task Agenda for HCI
Human–Computer Interaction, 2000
We identify a problem with the process of research in the HCI community-an overemphasis on "radical invention" at the price of achieving a common research focus. Without such a focus, it is difficult to build on previous work, to compare different interaction techniques objectively, and to make progress in developing theory. These problems at the research level have implications for practice, too; as researchers we often are unable to give principled design advice to builders of new systems. We propose that the HCI community try to achieve a common focus
Making Ourselves Useful: The evolution of HCI from a Formal to Practical discipline
Published histories of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) have presented the development of the discipline from many perspectives, including that of interaction technology, academic disciplines, professional entities, and models of the user. Starting from the constructivist epistemological premise that knowledge cannot be divorced from social context, this article analyses the practical concerns that formed the discipline of HCI and the social context in which the discipline continues to find its relevance. A historical survey of the development of HCI considers the context within which the discipline of HCI is most frequently practiced: computer (software and hardware) projects. A key theme in this history is shown to be a need for responsiveness to changing understandings of user requirements. The scope of consideration is then expanded to include the contexts of application domains, technology, and society. It is proposed that, considered within these broader contexts, the trajectory of development of HCI can be discerned as a movement from Formal to Practical methods, and the implications for HCI practitioners are discussed.
Grand challenges for future HCI research
Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Extending Boundaries - NordiCHI '10, 2010
This panel will analyze the research activities (including objectives, theoretical foundations, developments, synergy, and differences) of three research centers: • Center for Research on Activity, Development, and Learning (CRADLE), University of Helsinki, with a research focus on "expansive learning"; • Center for LifeLong Learning and Design (L3D). University of Colorado, with a research focus on "cultures of participation"; • InterMedia, Center for Communication, Design and Learning, University of Oslo, with a research focus on "interfaces supporting learning".