The twin migration and refugee crises in Europe: examining the OECD's contribution to the debate (original) (raw)
Related papers
The OECD and the twin migration and refugee crises in Europe
Several international stakeholders made their voice heard in the debate on the migration and refugee crises in Europe that peaked in 2014–2015. Frequently their arguments would reduce the challenge of migration to moral and legal obligation of the host countries. In contrast, the OECD, drawing on its vast advisory experience, global outlook and socioeconomic profile, offered a more pragmatic policy-oriented approach to both crises and their corollaries. Specifically, the OECD pointed to the demographic and economic opportunities arising from the influx of the large number of migrants to Europe. This notwithstanding, even if the stakes are high, it remains an open-ended question if the OECD member-states will be able to turn these opportunities into sustainable socio-economic benefits.
The European Union in times of migrant and refugee crises
Pachocka M., The European Union in times of migrant and refugee crises, w: Peculiarities of development in a globalized world economy, red. V. Beniuc, L. Rosca, Print–Caro – Institute of International Relations of Moldova, Chisinau 2016, s. 86–100, ISBN: 9789975309271. The paper presents two important crises – migrant and refugee ones – having been experienced by the EU and its member states at least since 2014. They are different in nature but they coexist and affect each other. The aim of the article is to briefly describe the current migrant and refugee situation in Europe, identify the main problems and challenges in this area as well as discuss the solutions proposed at the EU level and their implementation. A particular attention is paid to the European Agenda on Migration announced by the European Commission in May 2015 that was supposed to address the increasingly complex phenomenon of migration in a comprehensive way, incorporating both internal and external dimensions of policy in that field.
The European Development Response to the Refugee and Migration Crisis
International Organisations Research Journal, 2018
This paper is focused on the European development response to the refugee and migration crisis. European development aid was impacted by the refugee and migration crisis and appeared to be a tool to smooth the consequences of the crisis in Europe. The author conducted semi-structured interviews with scholars, policymakers and representatives of civil society and came to conclusion that the European Union (EU) and its members, instead of developing a strategic programme to resolve this structural issue, used a tactical solution to achieve the short-term goal of stopping migration. Short-term motivations prevailed over a long-term strategy and resulted in the politicization of development aid in policy papers: there was a significant change in the discourse regarding migration and development assistance. While EU members have indeed excessively used official development assistance (ODA) to host refugees in their countries, EU development programmes in African countries have been largely relabeled as "migration-related." So far there is no evidence-based research that redistribution of aid beneficiaries has taken place as a result of the policy to tackle the "root causes" of migration. This paper first outlines the European policy framework on development assistance which is aimed at migration management. Then it identifies the EU initiatives to mainstream migration into the development agenda, and considers members' use of ODA to cover domestic expenses for refugees and asylum seekers. The paper concludes by outlining the key concerns regarding instrumentalization of aid.
The Refugee Crises and EU's Policy Response
This article attempts to highlight the flow of migrants/refugees into the developed world in Europe and America that should be viewed and understood in the wider global context to effectively respond to the rising tides of migrants in these parts of the world. Many of these people are fleeing away from war and conflicts, persecution, corruption, lack of opportunities or abject poverty, and they are seeking protection against the ongoing conflicts, massive human rights violations and generalized violence in the source countries (Newland, 2016). Some tend to regard the majority of these people as economic migrants seeking better job opportunity and standard of life which they could not have in their own country. These two different points of views tend to conflict and mix up in the on-going debates on the migration “crises” in Europe and the United States regarding how to effectively address these growing challenges. It looks apparent that the increasing number of refugees and related challenges cannot be effectively addressed in the current policy approaches of increased border control, deportation, poor treatment of refugees and harsh conditions in detention centers. Despite the negative media portrayal of refugees as terrorists and threats to the Western life style, the economic rationale of the developed world seems to favor the positive impacts of increasing the participation of the migrant population in the unskilled labor markets in these countries. This is not, however, to argue that there should not be any attempt to control the flow of refugees into Europe. It is rather to promote the establishment of a more organized system of immigration that is harmonized under the proposed institution exercising a central authority within the EU which can provide a more orderly immigration process in line with a planned and agreed distribution key among member states. The policy response to the challenges of refugees should also consider the broader context of the global inequalities in terms of the distribution of wealth and employment opportunities that reflect deeper structural imbalances which would continue to sustain the flow of refugees into the developed world in the West. Therefore, there should be a strategic effort to correct such structural imbalances in global political and economic order to genuinely involve in the creation of wealth and better opportunities in the developing part of the world that are among the major factors which drive many of the migrant population to the attractions of the Western world.
International migration is a real challenge facing the European Union and its Member States today and in the near future. The EU has been one of the main destinations of increasing immigration on the regional and global scales since the beginning of the 21st century, while at the same time experiencing important migratory movements within its borders. Therefore, it has been looking for eff ective solutions to approach the multidimensional consequences of the growing influx of migrants into its territory. However, the events in international relations – especially in the Mediterranean Region aft er 2010 – raise more questions than provide answers. The aim of this paper is to present the recent immigration trends to the EU Member States, highlighting, in particular the importance of their consequences, as well as discuss the challenges they introduce together with possible solutions at the EU level.
Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and Policy in OECD Countries
American Economic Review
Refugees and asylum seekers are only a small proportion of the 60 million forcibly displaced persons. But those seeking asylum in the developed world have received much of the attention as western governments have struggled to develop a policy response. An analysis of asylum applications by origin and destination indicates that these flows are largely driven by political terror and human rights abuses. Poor economic conditions in origin countries and tough asylum policies in destination countries matter too. In the light of the findings I suggest that greater coordination among OECD countries could improve the lot of those fleeing from persecution but even this would make only modest inroads into the sum of human misery that displaced people exemplify.
Refugee and Asylum Migration to the OECD: A Short Overview
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012
This paper provides an overview of asylum migration from poor strife-prone countries to the OECD since the 1950s. I examine the political and economic factors in source countries that generate refugees and asylum seekers. Particular attention is given to the rising trend of asylum applications up to the 1990s, and the policy backlash that followed. I consider the political economy of restrictive asylum policies, especially in EU countries, as well as the effectiveness of those policies in deterring asylum seekers. The paper concludes with an outline of the assimilation of refugees in host country labour markets.
Refugee Crisis and Migrations at the Gates of Europe Deterritoriality, Extraterritoriality
Refugee Crisis and Migrations at the Gates of Europe: Deterritoriality, Extraterritoriality and Externalization of Border Controls, 2019
The refugee crisis has shaped a new perception of the migration reality in Europe. The ramifications of its impact on European integration are visible and enduring. The EU’s respon-se has included a certain strategic perspective, albeit weighed down by an excess of eurocentrism and a security perception that does not take third countries’ interests into balanced account. The ma-jor economic effort being made supports a far-reaching strategy, only now beginning to be outlined, to promote economic development in the countries of origin and transit of migrants. Additionally, issues such as the monitoring of respect for migrants’ human rights have not yet been suitably glo-bally defined in this strategy.Although the behaviour and response capacity of the EU and its Member States can be assessed in different ways, the truth is that the migration debate has decisively swayed a block of countries that are openly reluctant to engage in intra-European solidarity and accept the new realities ...