Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4): A National Program Testing Innovations in Family Medicine Residencies (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Future of Family Medicine: A Collaborative Project of the Family Medicine Community
The Annals of Family Medicine, 2004
BACKGROUND Recognizing fundamental fl aws in the fragmented US health care systems and the potential of an integrative, generalist approach, the leadership of 7 national family medicine organizations initiated the Future of Family Medicine (FFM) project in 2002. The goal of the project was to develop a strategy to transform and renew the discipline of family medicine to meet the needs of patients in a changing health care environment.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2007
Family Medicine residency programs must change substantially to prepare for new family physicians a model of practice for the 21st century. This article describes 10 essential skills that are part of a new model of family medicine and the educational changes and resources needed to obtain them. These skills include management of a population of patients, patient-centered care, personal medical home, best knowledge at the point of care, continuous access to multimodal communication, a new platform of care, time intensive visits, group visits, teamwork and interpersonal skills, and financial practice management. (J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:348 -355.)
Whither Family Medicine? Our Past, Future, and Enduring Scope of Practice
Family Medicine
After 3 decades in private practice, I joined the faculty of a nearby residency program. Like most family medicine residencies, it follows a curriculum that my physician father would have recognized: heavy emphasis on inpatient medicine; short shrift to continuity care. Despite a changing marketplace, there is still a disconnect between how we train graduates (for full spectrum care) and where they end up (in ambulatory practices). Is our identity disappearing? I contend that the primary and indispensable duty of a residency program is to model professional values and prepare residents to live and work in sustainable communities. Though the scope of practice will vary, family physicians still pride themselves in putting the needs of their patients at its center.
Residency Training in Family Medicine: A History of Innovation and Program Support
2017
BACKGROUND Residency programs have been integral to the development, expansion and progression of family medicine as a discipline. Three reports formed the foundation for graduate medical education in family medicine: Meeting the Challenge of Family Practice, The Graduate Education of Physicians, and Health is a Community Affair. In addition, the original core concepts of comprehensiveness, coordination, continuity, and patient centeredness continue to serve as the foundation for residency training in family medicine. While the Residency Review Committee for Family Medicine of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has provided the requirements for training throughout the years, key organizations including the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors, and the American Board of Family Medicine have provided resources for and supported innovation in programs. Residency Pr...
Four-year residency training for the next generation of family physicians
The virtual mentor : VM, 2005
Family medicine training is still largely based on a model developed more than 35 years ago, with 3 years of required rotations in multiple areas of medicine, combined with a longitudinal clinic experience in model family practice centers . The physician trained in this model has been prepared to practice in a range of settings and with diverse scopes of practice. The outcome is a physician workforce that is distributed across urban and rural America with important positive effects for the health of communities . The durability and beneficial outcomes of this training model suggest that it should continue, but there are several reasons to consider innovative changes in its character if not its duration:
A new model of practice: implications for medical student teaching in family medicine
Family medicine
worked with other family medicine leaders on the Future of Family Medicine project, which investigated how the specialty can adapt to provide quality health care in a changing environment and proposed a New Model of Family Medicine care. In this month's column, Dr Spann briefly describes the New Model of care and discusses how office-based teaching of medical students may change in practices that adopt it. I welcome your comments about this feature, which is also published on the STFM Web site at www. stfm.org. I also encourage all predoctoral directors to make copies of this feature and distribute it to their preceptors (with the appropriate Family Medicine citation). Send your submissions to williamh@bcm. tmc.edu.
The future role of the family physician in the United States: a rigorous exercise in definition
Annals of family medicine
As the U.S. health care delivery system undergoes rapid transformation, there is an urgent need to define a comprehensive, evidence-based role for the family physician. A Role Definition Group made up of members of seven family medicine organizations developed a statement defining the family physician's role in meeting the needs of individuals, the health care system, and the country. The Role Definition Group surveyed more than 50 years of foundational manuscripts including published works from the Future of Family Medicine project and Keystone III conference, external reviews, and a recent Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education Family Medicine Milestones definition. They developed candidate definitions and a "foil" definition of what family medicine could become without change. The following definition was selected: "Family physicians are personal doctors for people of all ages and health conditions. They are a reliable first contact for health conc...
A hard look at the future of family practice
California medicine, 1967
The progressive fall in the status and numbers of general practitioners has produced a dangerous void in the field of comprehensive medical care. The Millis Commission and other national study committees have recommended that family practice be made a board-certified specialty in order to restore the status and numbers of family physicians. The scope of family practice that is envisioned, however, would be so restricted in depth as to raise serious doubts that sufficient medical graduates would be attracted to careers in this new specialty. Better training in broadly-based general or family practice-rather than a specialty board, per se-is the only realistic way to elevate status and attract more medical students to this field.