Agriculture and the Doha Development Agenda (original) (raw)
Related papers
Agriculture and the WTO: Next Steps
Review of International Economics, 2001
The potential welfare gains from further liberalizing agricultural markets are shown in this paper to be huge, both absolutely and relative to gains from liberalizing textiles or other manufacturing, according to new simulation results of the Global Trade Analysis Project. The probability of the WTO delivering sizeable farm protection cuts in the next round of multilateral trade negotiations would be greater if industrial and service sector negotiations were undertaken simultaneously as part of a comprehensive new round. The immediate challenge for analysts and negotiators is to identify and assess feasible policy packages that facilitate genuine agricultural reform rather than encourage inefficient re-instrumentation of farm support measures. Such assessment will require significant improvements in both analytical tools and databases.
Shifting Sands: Searching for a Compromise in the Wto Negotiations on Agriculture
2004
The WTO negotiations on agriculture remain deadlocked after four years of discussion, and efforts to find a solution at Cancún failed. Analysis shows,that the recent draft Cancún text offers more flexibility than earlier proposals, and such flexibility most likely implies a lower level of ambition overall. However, developing countries are less able to take advantage of this flexibility and their bound tariff will be reduced to levels at or below applied rates. The reduction in levels of intervention and the expiry of the Peace Clause make,it more likely that there will be greater resort in the futureto safeguards and countervailing measures. Analysis of the various proposals using the UNCTAD/FAO Agricultural Trade Policy Simulation Model (ATPSM) shows ,that most of the benefits from liberalisation accrue to developed countries, which currently have the highest levels of intervention. The group of developing countries, which include both exporters and imports of agricultural product...
Agricultural Negotiations at the WTO: First, Do No Harm
CEIP Policy Outlook, 2005
The global chess game of trade negotiations reflects the more fundamental reality of how different economies are structured and how the world’s population makes a living. In rich countries, most people work in service industries or manufacturing. Very few make their living through agriculture. In France, for example, less than 3 percent of the population is engaged in farming; in the United States, the figure is less than 2 percent. By contrast, in poor countries agriculture is typically the largest employer. In low-income countries, an average of 68 percent of the population makes its living through farming. Even in middle- income countries, 25 percent of the population is engaged in agriculture. In India, farmers make up about 60 percent of the total workforce. These very different patterns of employment between developed and developing countries explain the broad context for the decision by developing countries to insist that their concerns about agriculture must be satisfied before they will commit to concessions in manufacturing and service sectors in the trade talks.
2001
This paper reviews the demands of developing countries in the new round of WTO agricultural negotiations which began in Geneva in March 2000 based on the submissions to the Special Session up to November 2000. Two issues of principle are identified. The first is the developing country demand for equality of outcomes in the negotiations, and not just equality of commitments. Because developed countries made the most use of agricultural support and protection in the past, developing countries argue that equal reduction commitments would still leave a very lop-sided playing-field in which the great bulk of support and protection would continue to be provided by the developed countries. The second issue concerns the role and content of special and differential treatment (SDT) in the current round. The paper notes the need for specific proposals under this heading, but warns that too much flexibility could encourage developing countries down a road which Europe has found leads to costly ...
Multilateral Trade Reform in Agriculture and the Developing Countries
2000
A further round of negotiations on agricultural trade liberalisation began in the WTO in March 2000. This paper discusses the interests of developing countries in these negotiations. Compared to the developed countries, developing countries have relatively few 'rights' to agricultural support under the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture and thus have an interest in pressing for a significant tightening of agricultural support disciplines. On the other hand, food importing and least developed countries wish to retain the maximum amount of flexibility to pursue domestic food security and rural development policies and are concerned about the possible negative effects of higher world food prices resulting from a reduction in developed country agricultural support. An important aspect of the negotiations is the extent to which developing countries will be able to, or should, rely on special and differential treatment to reconcile these differences. Developing countries nee...
Doha negotiations on agriculture and future of the WTO multilateral Trade System
QA Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, 2014
The WTO Doha Round of trade negotiations was launched in 2001 and after twelve years of negotiations members seem unable to bring it to a successful conclusion. An attempt to agree on an 'early harvest' of deliverables will be made at the 9 th WTO Ministerial Conference in Bali in December 2013, but the prospects for success appear uncertain. This paper describes the stage that the negotiations have reached in agriculture and summarises the most recent draft modalities for agricultural trade liberalisation. It surveys recent estimates of the value of what is currently on the table. It discusses the reasons for the current impasse in the negotiations and asks whether agricultural trade liberalisation would be better served by abandoning the Doha Round. The paper argues that this would not be the case, and concludes by speculating on the minimum conditions necessary to ensure a conclusion to the Round.
Developing Countries’ Position in WTO Agricultural Trade Negotiations
Development Policy Review, 2002
Four themes in the developing countries' position are highlighted. (i) They are seeking meaningful improvements in market access for their agricultural exports. (ii) They have highlighted the asymmetry of current WTO obligations under the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, and are seeking greater equality of outcomes in the new round. (iii) Meaningful concessions on special and differential treatment will be necessary to satisfy the interests of both exporters and importers, especially on the scope to be allowed for tariff protection to domestic food production. (iv) Innovative and reliable guarantees will need to be provided to the least developed food importers to protect them against the risk of world price volatility.