Introduction to Polity Symposium on Antje Wiener's A Theory of Contestation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Norms and Social Constructivism in International Relations
Social norms were conceptualized as aspects of social structure that emerged from the actions and beliefs of actors in specific communities; norms shaped those actions and beliefs by constituting actors' identities and interests. Early constructivist work in the 1980s and early 1990s sought to establish a countervailing approach to the material and rational theories that dominated the study of international relations. Empirically oriented constructivists worked to show that shared ideas about appropriate state behavior had a significant impact on the nature and functioning of world politics. Initial constructivist studies of social norms can be divided into three areas: normative, socialization, and normative emergence. After making the case that norms matter and developing a number of theoretical frameworks to show how norms emerge, spread, and influence behavior, norms-oriented constructivists have shifted their attention to a new set of questions, and in particular compliance with the strictures of social norms and change in norms themselves. Ideas about whether actors reason about norms or through norms can be linked to behavioral logics, which provide conceptions of how actors and norms are linked. Two types of normative dynamics can be identified: the first is endogenous contestation; the second is compliance or diffusion. In order to better understand compliance with and contestation over norms either in isolation or together, it is necessary to pay more attention to the prior understanding of who is in the community. Another topic that requires further consideration in future research is the relationship between intersubjective and subjective reality.
PRIF Working Paper No. 49, 2020
The paper outlines a framework for studying norm complexity in international politics. We argue that – due to the increasing density and plurality of the global order – relations and interactions between international norms are gaining relevance as factors influencing norm evolution. While IR scholars have long acknowledged that international norms are embedded in wider normative contexts, this insight has been slow to translate into focused explorations of norm complexity. To advance this line of research, we classify different forms of norm relations that capture norms’ structural positions vis-à-vis each other, identify different types of norm interactions enabled by, but also generating norm relations, and propose a research agenda that exploits our framework to inquire into potential effects of norm complexity: Does it help or harm the emergence, spread, and robustness of individual norms? Does it enable or constrain norm promoters and addressees? Does it empower strong or weak actors?
Contested Norms in International Law and International Relations
What actors make of norms matters, in particular, in situations of crisis when the contextual conditions for norm interpretation are enhanced. That is, situations of crisis add an additional factor of pressure next to the conditions of normative contingency and moving the social practice of governance beyond the boundaries of modern states. The addition of time requires fast decisions thus leaving little room for deliberation about a norm’s meaning. Contrary to the expectation that based on an increasing constitutional quality in beyond-the-state contexts, actors can build on and refer to a set of formally and informally shared principles for information and guidance in designing common action and policies, we hold that norm interpretation in international relations is challenged by the absence of cultural background information. If this observation holds, it follows that the often observed constitutional quality beyond the state which includes the formalization of the role of inter...
Do norms have a significant influence on international politics?
This essay will argue that norms do have a significant influence on international politics. We can explore the essay title in a way that asks whether norms have changed the way we approach international politics, and how it makes us to continue to do so. For example, the following simple question can be asked: if norms were taken out of the list of variables which act as influences in ‘international politics’, do we sill live in an international system that was present, say, during the Cold War? The answer is no. Thus we are going to structure the essay to highlight how norms influence the way we construct our society, which consequently influences international politics. The ‘Cycle of Norms’ will be mentioned, as well as Wendt’s approach on how we view anarchy. In addition, the structure and agency relationship will be featured in this essay, and will play a significant role in justifying the answer to the essay title; it stresses how norms have helped to shape not only how we approach international politics as adaptable agents, but also to shape the international structure in a way which they have encouraged us to do. By the end of this essay, the conclusion will come to agreeing that norms have a significant influence on international politics.
PRIF Working Paper No. 49, 2020
The paper outlines a framework for studying norm complexity in international politics. We argue that – due to the increasing density and plurality of the global order – relations and interactions between international norms are gaining relevance as factors influencing norm evolution. While IR scholars have long acknowledged that international norms are embedded in wider normative contexts, this insight has been slow to translate into focused explorations of norm complexity. To advance this line of research, we classify different forms of norm relations that capture norms’ structural positions vis-à-vis each other, identify different types of norm interactions enabled by, but also generating norm relations, and propose a research agenda that exploits our framework to inquire into potential effects of norm complexity: Does it help or harm the emergence, spread, and robustness of individual norms? Does it enable or constrain norm promoters and addressees? Does it empower strong or weak actors?
Broadening the Contestation of Norms in International Relations
Polity, 2017
A ntje Wiener's A Theory of Contestation is an impressive achievement. Readers of this meticulous undertaking should not be fooled by its conciseness. While a seemingly brief book-length study, it is nevertheless a mighty work that treats the contestation of norms in a comprehensive, persuasive, and detailed fashion. It succeeds in pursuing its analytical, theoretical, normative, and empirical purposes. What follows is a presentation of the types of critiques that seem to be excluded from her analysis, but ones that the book (and its author) I think can speak to. These should not be read as critiques that expose some major flaw in the book, but rather as an invitation for further extension and discussion for how we might grapple with its argument in ways not initially captured by its scope. Wiener does a meticulous job in the book of discussing the importance of access to norm contestation along three dimensions: formal validation, social recognition, and cultural validation. In her words, "the key point, which A Theory of Contestation wishes to highlight, is that access to these three dimensions is not equally shared among all stakeholders." 1 Indeed, this point of her theory of contestation is carefully focused. Yet while she engages the critical constructivist focus on norms and their contestation, I do not see much critique of norms themselves in Wiener's theory-norms being problematized because of the norms' exclusionary features when they are formed (within particularly communities), but universally applied thereafter. Let me provide two sets of examples regarding strident forms of contestationresistance and even rebellion-of and against norms. Wiener situates her theory The author would like to thank Jonathan Havercroft for organizing this symposium and for the roundtable that preceded it. He thanks those who participated in the roundtable and this symposium for enriching his understanding of the text, and especially Professor Wiener for her provocative and rich book. 1. Antje Wiener, A Theory of Contestation (London: Springer, 2014), 5.
Effects of international norms: A typology
Journal of International Political Theory, 2023
The constructivist research programme on international norms has demonstrated convincingly that, how, and why norms matter. Norms have been shown to constitute the identity of actors, to guide their behaviour into desired directions, and, altogether, to generate the normative basis of the international system. In the course of this intensive debate, its main concepts, such as the question of what constitutes a norm or different norm types, became fuzzy. Also, while the focus on the intended effects of norms certainly encompasses an essential part of the phenomenon, their unintended effects have been largely neglected. Motivated by these shortcomings, the article presents a new systematisation of effects of norms. The typology developed here discerns two types of intended effects, namely prohibitive and obligative effects, as well as two corresponding types of unintended effects, namely permissive and omissive effects.
"Conceptualizing and assessing norm strength in International Relations"
European Journal of International Relations, 2021
What constitutes a strong or a weak norm? Scholars often refer to strong or weak, or strengthening or weakening norms, yet there are widespread inconsistencies in terminology and no agreed-upon measures. This has hindered the accumulation of knowledge and made it difficult to test competing hypotheses about norm development and contestation. To address these conceptual problems and their analytical implications, this article conceptualizes norm strength as the extent of collective expectations related to a principled idea and proposes two indicators to assess a norm’s strength: the level of international concordance with a principled idea, and the degree of international institutionalization of a principled idea. The article illustrates the applicability and utility of the proposed conceptualization by evaluating the strengths of two transitional justice norms: the norm of legal accountability and the norm of truth-seeking. In so doing, the article resolves empirical disputes over the origins and status of these norms. In particular, the analysis reveals that while legal accountability became a norm in the early 1990s and is today a strong norm, truth-seeking emerged later and remains a weak norm. More generally, the proposed framework should advance existing debates about norm contestation, localization, violation, and erosion.
The behaviour of sovereign states within the international system is a complex and multifaceted puzzle that has engrossed the interests of interdisciplinary scholars alike. This paper identifies the constitutive and structural dimensions of norms through exploring the significance of international norms on a state's decision-making process. This paper takes a keen interest into contemporary terminology, methodological issues and contemporary academic debate through the application of a Neoclassical Realist analysis. This paper is an early draft copy, so reference as such, for further questions and issues please contact: wz011041@live.reading.ac.uk https://www.linkedin.com/in/isaac-wales-458247134/