Explaining Domestic Violence Policy Outcomes in Chile and Argentina (original) (raw)
Related papers
Legal Inequality and Federalism: Domestic Violence Laws in the Argentine Provinces
This article shows that the institutional design of Argentine federalism allows for differences in the protective scope of the provincial domestic violence laws. It holds that the broad legislative capacities of subnational districts enable the working of political and social local factors, which, in turn, determine heterogeneity in these laws' protective scope. It analyzes, compares, and measures 37 laws on domestic violence sanctioned between 1992 and 2009. It advances a methodology to measure their differences and it evaluates the impact local factors have on legal variations across jurisdictions. The article shows that the protective scope of these laws is determined by the intensity of the local electoral competition and by the strength of women's organizational capacity. Results also show that time matters insofar as it allows for the diffusion of more protective laws.
A New "Shield of the Weak": Continued Paternalism of Domestic Violence Services in Uruguay
Violence against women, 2018
Drawing on ethnographic and historical research, this article illuminates the limitations of the Uruguayan domestic violence services system. In spite of how advocates in Uruguay successfully used a human rights platform to secure legislation and services, this system now faces significant critique. Using Iris Marion Young's work on the "logic of masculinist protection" and historical parallels in Uruguay's welfare system, I discuss how a paternalistic approach may be to blame. I highlight how this paternalism contributes to the paternalism that problematically underlies gendered violence-reinforcing rather than addressing oppressive ideologies and structures that impede improving conditions for women.
How domestic violence came to be viewed as a public issue and policy object
2000
This article analyses the process whereby domestic violence in Chile became a subject of open discussion and a public issue in- cluded in the institutional agenda of the Executive and the Leg- islature, giving rise to preventive programmes against such violence and public services for aiding its victims, together with the adoption of a law against intra-family violence in 1994.
2013
The research proposed here aims to contribute to current knowledge on policy-making addressing gender-based violence (GBV), especially violence against women (VAW) by comparing two post-transition democracies Argentina (Ar) and Chile (Cl), in comparison to a country with a stable long-term democracy Australia. The research looks into existing policies and tries to determine whether different socio-political histories affect the way women’s movements and women’s policy actors frame gender-based violence (GBV)/violence against women (VAW) and the way governments respond to it in the three study cases.
Engendering State Institutions: State Response to Violence Against Women in Latin America, provides a much-needed explanation for two questions central to general inquiries about the quality of democracy, state-building, and institutional performance: What are the conditions under which states will construct institutions that address the needs of historically marginalized groups? What explains variation in the performance of these institutions that are charged with protecting vulnerable groups and ensuring their access to justice? I examine the creation and performance of specialized policing institutions for women as examples of these broader state-building efforts. I conduct a rich in-depth comparative analysis of Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica, with additional attention to Honduras and El Salvador. Surprisingly, countries with the fewest resources such as Nicaragua have developed a wide network of policing institutions, while countries with more capacity such as Costa Rica have not. I explain that the history and strength of transnational advocacy networking determines the creation and performance of these new state institutions, as opposed to efforts located and initiated primarily within the state or within local civil society. Transnational advocacy networks help to solve the twin problems of lack of will within the state and lack of resources within civil society by providing external pressure and funding. To support this argument, I draw heavily on 18 months of fieldwork with over 200 in-depth interviews conducted in Latin America with actors in the state, civil society, and international organizations between 2007 and 2014. Engendering State Institutions makes a unique contribution to existing scholarship both in terms of its empirical contribution (it is the first on the topic of responsiveness to violence against women that focuses comparatively on Central American countries) as well as its theoretical contribution (it is the first to advance a theoretical framework explaining how states build institutions to protect women victims of violence). Please see http://www.d.umn.edu/\~sdwalsh for updates and further information.
Intimate Partner Violence against Women: Prevalence, Formal Reporting, and Risk Factors in Chile
Policy Research Working Papers
The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent.
Social and Public Policy Responses to Domestic Violence in Argentina and Cuba
CESLA No 3, 2002
Este artículo fue publicado en: Los Derechos Humanos de las Latinoamericanas: el Cuerpo Importa. Edición a cargo de Marta Zabaleta. Revista del CESLA Nº 3. Aquí se ofrece un análisis comparado de información de primera mano recogida en Buenos Aires y en La Habana por la autora, respecto a la respuesta a la violencia doméstica en dichas ciudades. El trabajo se concentra en los dispositivos existentes para frenar la violencia y asistir a las víctimas de la misma. El artículo ofrece también una aproximación al debate existente sobre la intervención o no intervención del Estado para frenar la violencia doméstica, tanto en países anglosajones como en América Latina, para contextualizar dicha intervención en los países de estudio. El estudio concluye señalando los aspectos positivos de cada respuesta, y aquellos que podrían verse mejorados.
This article analyses the specific ways in which Latin American countries have judicialised domestic violence over the last decade. In particular, it highlights the new definitions of spousal abuse and procedures adopted in both criminal and non-criminal courts. The region has seen two countervailing tendencies, the first to criminalise, through penal codedefinitions and higher penalties, the second to divert this offence into legal arenas that tend, either implicitly or explicitly, towards effective decriminalisation and downgrading of this form of social violence due to their emphasis on conciliation and transactional procedures. This has resulted, in many cases, in a two-track, hybridised treatment of domestic violence that is ultimately unsatisfactory in meeting the various needs of women victims.
Resisting patriarchy within the State: Advocacy and family violence in Mexico
Women's Studies International Forum, 2010
all but three states in the Mexican Federation passed laws dealing specifically with family violence. These laws are more symbolic than substantive for protecting women's rights given their unbridgeable duality of objectives: one the one hand affirming the sanctity of the family, while on the other protecting family members from the threat of family violence. The patriarchal attitudes that permeate the State are reflected in the terms and objectives of family violence legislation. Although the formal aim of the legislation has been to protect women from partner violence, the subordination of its contents and implementation to the goal of preserving families has worked against protecting the victims of partner violence. This article adopts a poststructuralist feminist perspective on the State, conceptualizing it not as a unified entity, but in terms of the collaborations and conflicts of the multiple agencies, agents, and agendas which constitute it. Using Giddens' structuration theory, I examine patterns of resistance both to the patriarchal social structure and to the State that is reproducing it. Some State employees-most of whom are women-who work in agencies that provide direct assistance to victims of family violence and design prevention programs work around the familist agenda by reinterpreting and ignoring regulations, investing their own time and resources to protect victims of partner violence. This article explores the agency of these individuals and examines how they strategically challenge or derail the reproduction of patriarchal structures by the State, working from within it.