Side Effects in Time Discounting Procedures: Fixed Alternatives Become the Reference Point (original) (raw)

Abstract

Typical research on intertemporal choice utilizes a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) paradigm requiring participants to choose between a smaller sooner and larger later payoff. In the adjusting-amount procedure (AAP) one of the alternatives is fixed and the other is adjusted according to particular choices made by the participant. Such a method makes the alternatives unequal in status and is speculated to make the fixed alternative a reference point for choices, thereby affecting the decision made. The current study shows that fixing different alternatives in the AAP influences discount rates in intertemporal choices. Specifically, individuals' (N = 283) choices were affected to just the same extent by merely fixing an alternative as when choices were preceded by scenarios explicitly imposing reference points.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (46)

  1. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez M (1989) Delay of gratification in children. Science 244: 933-938. PMID: 2658056
  2. Moffitt TE, Arseneault L, Belsky D, Dickson N, Hancox RJ, Harrington H, et al. (2011) A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 2693-2698.
  3. Reynolds B, Schiffbauer R (2005) Delay of gratification and delay discounting: A unifying feedback model of delay-related impulsive behavior. The Psychological Record 55: 439-460.
  4. Loewenstein G (1988) Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science 34: 200-214.
  5. Baron J, Greene J (1996) Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: Contri- bution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence. Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy: Applied 2: 107-125.
  6. Benzion U, Rapoport A, Yagil J (1989) Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management science 35: 270-284.
  7. Hardisty DJ, Thompson KF, Krantz DH (2013) How to measure time preferences: An experimental comparison of three methods. Judgment and Decision Making 8: 236-249.
  8. Rachlin H, Raineri A, Cross D (1991) Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 55: 233-244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233 PMID: 2037827
  9. Appelt K, Hardisty D, Weber E (2011) Asymmetric discounting of gains and losses: A query theory account. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 43: 107-126.
  10. Robles E, Vargas PA (2007) Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks: Order of presentation. Behavioural Processes 75: 237-241. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.014 PMID: 17368757
  11. Holt DD, Newquist MH, Smits RR, Tiry AM (2014) Discounting of food, sex, and money. Psychonomic bulletin & review 21: 794-802.
  12. Du W, Green L, Myerson J (2002) Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Record 52: 479-492.
  13. Holt DD, Green L, Myerson J (2012) Estimating the subjective value of future rewards: Comparison of adjusting-amount and adjusting-delay procedures. Behavioural processes 90: 302-310. doi: 10.1016/ j.beproc.2012.03.003 PMID: 22445576
  14. Yoon H, Chapman GB (2015) A Closer Look at the Yardstick: A New Discount Rate Measure with Pre- cision and Range. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making: n/a-n/a.
  15. Mazur JE, Biondi DR (2009) Delay-Amount Tradeoffs in Choices by Pigeons and Rats: Hyperbolic ver- sus Exponential Discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 91: 197-211. doi: 10. 1901/jeab.2009.91-197 PMID: 19794834
  16. Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 443-477.
  17. Myerson J, Green L, Warusawitharana M (2001) Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 76: 235-243. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235 PMID: 11599641
  18. Malanowski P, Marcinkowska J (2012) Działalność Centralnego Rejestru Sprzeciwo ´w. Poltransplant 20: 49-53.
  19. Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG (2003) Do defaults save lives? Science 302: 1338-1339. doi: 10.1126/ science.1091721 PMID: 14631022
  20. Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG (2004) Defaults and donation decisions. Transplantation 78: 1713-1716. PMID: 15614141
  21. John P, Smith G, Stoker G (2009) Nudge nudge, think think: two strategies for changing civic behav- iour. The Political Quarterly 80: 361-370.
  22. Thaler R, Sunstein C (1976) Nudge. London: Penguin.
  23. Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1992) Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 573-597.
  24. Białek M, Sawicki P (2014) Can taking the perspective of an expert debias human decisions? The case of risky and delayed gains. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 989. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00989 PMID: 25237307
  25. Bickel KW, Odum LA, Madden JG (1999) Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in cur- rent, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146: 447-454. PMID: 10550495
  26. Breuer W, Soypak KC (2015) Framing effects in intertemporal choice tasks and financial implications. Journal of Economic Psychology 51: 152-167.
  27. Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2008) An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 16: 264-274. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.264 PMID: 18540786
  28. Scholten M, Read D (2010) The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psychological Review 117: 925-944. doi: 10.1037/a0019619 PMID: 20658858
  29. Green L, Myerson J (1996) Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time. American Zoologist 36: 496-505.
  30. Read D (2001) Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? Journal of risk and uncertainty 23: 5-32.
  31. Thaler R (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters 8: 201-207.
  32. Shelley MK (1993) Outcome signs, question frames and discount rates. Management Science 39: 806-815.
  33. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T (2002) Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 351-401.
  34. Scholten M, Read D (2011) Descriptive Models of Intertemporal Choice Part 2: The Delay-Speedup Asymmetry and Other Anomalies. Available at SSRN 1849705.
  35. Israel A, Rosenboim M, Shavit T (2014) Using priming manipulations to affect time preferences and risk aversion: An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.
  36. Hershfield HE, Goldstein DG, Sharpe WF, Fox J, Yeykelis L, Carstensen LL, et al. (2011) Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research 48: S23-S37. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S23 PMID: 24634544
  37. Hardisty DJ, Thompson K, Krantz D, Weber EU (2011) How to Measure Discount Rates? An Experi- mental Comparison of Three Methods. SSRN Working Paper Series.
  38. Bialek M, Sawicki P (2016) Cognitive reflection and asymmetry in time discounting: a query theory account. Theory & Decision in press.
  39. Weber EU, Johnson EJ, Milch KF, Chang H, Brodscholl JC, Goldstein DG (2007) Asymmetric dis- counting in intertemporal choice a query-theory account. Psychological science 18: 516-523. doi: 10. 1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.x PMID: 17576265
  40. Johnson EJ, Ha ¨ubl G, Keinan A (2007) Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33: 461-474. doi: 10.1037/ 0278-7393.33.3.461 PMID: 17470000
  41. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The journal of economic perspectives 5: 193-206.
  42. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 1039-1061.
  43. Białek M, Markiewicz Ł, Sawicki P (2015) Introducing conjoint analysis method into delayed lotteries studies: its validity and time stability are higher than in adjusting. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 23. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00023 PMID: 25674069
  44. Marzilli Ericson KM, White JM, Laibson D, Cohen JD (2015) Money Earlier or Later? Simple Heuristics Explain Intertemporal Choices Better Than Delay Discounting Does. Psychological Science 26: 826- 833. doi: 10.1177/0956797615572232 PMID: 25911124
  45. Chapman GB, Winquist JR (1998) The magnitude effect: Temporal discount rates and restaurant tips. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5: 119-123.
  46. Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1991) Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management science 37: 770-786.