A Space Of Their Own: Institutions and Gendered Space (original) (raw)

Piddock, S (2011) To Each a Space: Class, Classification and Gender in Colonial South Australian Institutions. Historical Archaeology. 45 (3), 89-105

In South Australia government authorities in a fledging colony were required to build institutions to care for the poor and the pauper insane, and they drew on designs from England, where workhouses and county asylums were being built in response to new laws. From a simple glance at the plans of the Destitute Asylum, which was built to house the deserving poor, and of the Adelaide and Parkside Lunatic asylums, it would appear that gender divisions dominated life in these institutions. A study of the material culture of the asylums, however, indicates a complex range of factors was, in fact, informing the experience of the asylum for the inmates. Gender, classification, social class, and the organizational purpose of the particular institution were all to play a role in determining the access to and use of the space and rooms of the asylums.

Equity and Gender in Australian Archeology: A Survey of the “Women in Archaeology” Conference, 1991

Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2008

In February 1991 the initial "Women in Archaeology" conference was held in Australia. This was the first conference in Australia that had been dedicated entirely to an examination of gender issues both in the development of archeology theory and in the archeological workplace and career structures. Prior to this meeting only a handful of papers explicitly exploring gender issues had been presented at Australian conferences, and fewer had appeared in Australian archeological publications. When discussions of gender issues were presented publicly, it was often in an atmosphere of disinterest and, on occasion, hostility. Australian archeology is by no means unusual in this, and one of the issues raised at the conference was that of why an interest in gender issues had arisen at the time they had. As Wylie put the question: "why is an archaeology of gender emerging (only) now?" (Wylie 1991, 1992).

Gender in Aboriginal archaeology: Recent research

Australian Archaeology, 1994

Feminist knowledge and its impact on other academic disciplines arose in the 1970s, but it has had an uneven impact in different disciplines. We argue that gender as a theoretical concept has challenged both sociology and archaeology but analyses of gender practices and embodiment which challenge the homogenous categories of 'women' and 'men' have made much less impact in archaeology -particularly the archaeology of deep time. The paper concludes by suggesting that feminist archaeology's exploration of the origins of gender offers critical insights concerning the ways in which feminist sociologists defi ne their theories with and against the 'Western folk model' of sex and gender.

On the Margin: Women, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage - An Australian Case Study

Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2008

Heritage Consultants, Australia INTRODUCTION Many writings about women in archeology deal with the issues of women's access to education and jobs. This article describes a situation where an institutional culture may facilitate the employment of women archeologists, but subsequently limit their effectiveness. In such a case, where archeology itself, in the form of cultural resource management, is marginal, women archeologists can find themselves in a double bind. The situation also creates a contradictory situation for male archeologists, and for Aboriginal people who work in Aboriginal heritage, but who do not generally have professional qualifications. This analysis is based on my experiences and observations as an archeologist with the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), one of the largest employers of archeologists and other specialists in cultural resource management in Australia. Women comprise the majority of archeologists employed in an organization that is otherwise predominantly male, and women have always held the most senior cultural heritage management positions.

Gender and Archaeology

Oxford Online Bibliographies in Anthropology, 2022

Detailed annotated anglophone bibliography on gender and archaeology including historiography, heritage activities, theories, approaches and scales of analysis

PROGRAMME TO PRACTICE: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology (with Margaret Conkey)

Annual Review of Anthropology, 1997

In the past decade, archaeologists have given considerable attention to research on gender in the human past. In this review, we attempt to acknowledge much of this diverse and abundant work from an explicitly feminist perspective. We focus on reviewing a selection of approaches to gender that are anchored to specific theoretical standpoints. In addition, we highlight several approaches that challenge an archaeology ofgender that does not explicitly engage with the implications of this topic fbr research, practice, and interpretation. From our perspective, we suggest the value of situating gender research within an explicitly feminist framework. and we draw attention to some of the impofiant insights for archaeology from the wider field of feminist critiques of science. Last, we draw attention to the crucial implications for the practice of archaeolosv.

To Each a Space: Class, Classification, and Gender in Colonial South Australian Institutions

Historical Archaeology, 2011

FRORQ\ were required to build institutions to care for the poor and the pauper insane, and they drew on designs from England, where workhouses and county asylums were being built in response to new laws. From a simple glance at the plans of the Destitute Asylum, which was built to house the deserving poor, and of the Adelaide and Parkside Lunatic asylums, it would appear that gender divisions dominated life in these institutions. A study of the material culture of the asylums, however, indicates a complex range of factors was, in fact, informing the experience of the asylum for the inmates. Gender, FODVVL¿FDWLRQ VRFLDO FODVV DQG WKH RUJDQL]DWLRQDO SXUSRVH RI the particular institution were all to play a role in determining the access to and use of the space and rooms of the asylums.

PROGRAMME TO PRACTICE: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology

In the past decade, archaeologists have given considerable attention to research on gender in the human past. In this review, we attempt to acknowledge much of this diverse and abundant work from an explicitly feminist perspective. We focus on reviewing a selection of approaches to gender that are anchored to specific theoretical standpoints. In addition, we highlight several approaches that challenge an archaeology ofgender that does not explicitly engage with the implications of this topic fbr research, practice, and interpretation. From our perspective, we suggest the value of situating gender research within an explicitly feminist framework. and we draw attention to some of the impofiant insights for archaeology from the wider field of feminist critiques of science. Last, we draw attention to the crucial implications for the practice of archaeolosv.

Engendering Origins: Theories of Gender in Sociology and Archaeology

Australian Archaeology, 2008

Feminist knowledge and its impact on other academic disciplines arose in the 1970s, but it has had an uneven impact in different disciplines. We argue that gender as a theoretical concept has challenged both sociology and archaeology but analyses of gender practices and embodiment which challenge the homogenous categories of 'women' and 'men' have made much less impact in archaeology-particularly the archaeology of deep time. The paper concludes by suggesting that feminist archaeology's exploration of the origins of gender offers critical insights concerning the ways in which feminist sociologists defi ne their theories with and against the 'Western folk model' of sex and gender.