New Nordic Exceptionalism: Jeuno JE Kim and Ewa Einhorn’s The United Nations of Norden and other realist utopias (original) (raw)

At the 2009 Nordic Culture Forum summit in Berlin that centered on the profiling and branding of the Nordic region in a globalized world, one presenter stood out from the crowd. The lobbyist Annika Sigurdardottir delivered a speech that called for the establishment of ‘‘The United Nations of Norden’’: A Nordic union that would gather the nations and restore Norden’s role as the ‘‘moral superpower of the world.’’ Sigurdardottir’s presentation generated such a heated debate that the organizers had to intervene and reveal that the speech was a performance made by the artists Jeuno JE Kim and Ewa Einhorn. This article takes Kim and Einhorn’s intervention as a starting point for a critical discussion of the history and politics of Nordic image-building. The article suggests that the reason Kim and Einhorn’s speech passed as a serious proposal was due to its meticulous mimicking of two discursive formations that have been central to the debates on the branding of Nordicity over the last decades: on the one hand, the discourse of ‘‘Nordic exceptionalism,’’ that since the 1960s has been central to the promotion of a Nordic political, socio- economic, and internationalist ‘‘third way’’ model, and, on the other hand, the discourse on the ‘‘New Nordic,’’ that emerged out of the New Nordic Food-movement in the early 2000s, and which has given art and culture a privileged role in the international re-fashioning of the Nordic brand. Through an analysis of Kim and Einhorn’s United Nations of Norden (UNN)-performance, the article examines the his- torical development and ideological underpinnings of the image of Nordic unity at play in the discourses of Nordic exceptionalism and the New Nordic. By focusing on how the UNN-project puts pressure on the role of utopian imaginaries in the construction of Nordic self-images, the article describes the emergence of a discursive framework of New Nordic Exceptionalism.

Reconstructing Nordic Significance in Europe on the Threshold of the 21st Century

2009

The paper deals with examples of reconstructing the significance of Northern Europe (Norden) in the post-modern social reality. After decades of being regarded as a trailblazer of the social modernisation project from the 1960 to the 1980s, the Nordic societal model and the Nordic identity deriving from it experienced a period of crisis in the beginning of the 1990s. As noted by a leading Danish specialist of international relations, the past ideas and self-images of being better than Europe, upon which the Scandinavian model had been founded, started to give way to fears of the Nordic area becoming a periphery in the new geopolitical setting after the Cold War. The European Union and the Baltic Sea region became the nodal co-ordinates of the discourse that aimed at counteracting the alleged peripherization of this area. The paper attempts to point at the actors and sketch the scope of the discourses that contributed to the process of construction of the new identity as a part of the emerging Baltic Sea region identity. This involved reshaping of the Nordic social and geographical space of reference and reconstructing nodal points of the Nordic identity in a post-modern fashion. Institutional and individual actors that constructed the new reality are presented along with the new structures that have arisen as a result of their actions. Particular attention has been paid to the political agenda that made regionalization in the Baltic Sea area a prominent theme of the Nordic identity formation after the Cold War.

Reinvention through Nordicness: values, traditions, and terroir

The Nordic Wave in Place Branding: Poetics, Practices, Politics, 2019

In this chapter we seek to develop the notion of ‘the Nordic’ as brand further. We propose to see ‘the Nordic’ as a complex umbrella brand strategy that is based on materializations and performances of Nordicness, even if the different brands under the general umbrella does not explicitly use the term ‘Nordic’ in the brand name or other central denotations of the product or service. ‘Nordicness’ can refer to aesthetics, images, myths, social concepts such as ‘hygge’ or even socioeconomic concepts such as ‘Nordic welfare’ and the surrounding ideologies and values (Linnet 2011; 2015; Østergaard et al. 2014).

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.