Interventions in Conflict: International Peacemaking in the Middle East (original) (raw)
Related papers
War, peace, and Mediation in the Middle East
The text outlines and analyzes the main negotiation processes undertaken in the Middle East since 1947. The first section deals with the period between the partition and the Six Day War; the second section analyzes the period between that point and the Oslo Accords of 1993; the third section goes from Oslo to the present day. It concludes that no specific method will solve the situation, and points to the immense costs to be incurred by any person or organization purporting to be a mediator.
The unresolved international conflicts over the years clearly indicate that current policies and practices in world politics failed in bringing peace to every part of the world. The failure of peace efforts in the Middle East was a major disappointment for the entire world, but its impact was mostly felt by the Palestinian and the Israeli people. This study depicts the prevailing process shaped mainly on the problematic relations between Israel and Palestine. After analyzing the dead ends in the peace negotiations, the challenges and prospects are presented by reviewing the literature and multiculturalism theory. The study proposes that reconstruction of the conditions that makes cooperation possible and effective between conflicted parties is necessary to evaluate the distortions that impede the dialogue and cause terrorism.
Mediating international conflicts: Challenges and opportunities
This study focusses on lessons learned from four case studies - Guatemala, Tajikistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Sudan -, looking at mediation in light of the complexity and adaptability. Ultimately, the author suggests that the gains from the field's quantitative studies can be enhanced through qualitative analyses that reflect on peace processes and their successes and failures.
Diplomacy on the Jordan: International Conflict and Negotiated Resolution
2001
List of Figures. List of Tables. List of Appendices. Foreword. Acknowledgments. I: Plans for the Jordan River Basin. II: Resorting to Diplomacy. III: Attempts at Reconciliation - The Johnston's Shuttle. IV: Preventive Diplomacy. V: Spinning Out of Control. VI: Water for the Jordan Valley. VII: The Sand Bar. VIII: The Middle East Peace Process. IX: The Common Agenda. X: The Process Continues. XI: The Peace Treaty. XII: The Challenge of Implementation. Appendices. Index.
Patterns of peacemaking: when do we see mediation, and what are the impacts?
International mediation is a form of diplomatic interven- tion aimed at reaching negoti- ated solutions to armed con- flict, political violence and in- ternational crises. Used by states, organizations, groups or individuals, mediation con- tinues to be an important form of peacemaking. This brief outlines the major trends in international mediation, iden- tifies relevant empirical trends and discusses implications for policy.
What is new in Annapolis? What are the useful lessons from the past? What is the different from the President Clinton's attempt at Camp David, a half year before he left his office? What are the chances of success? What is the cost of failure? How effective are the American Role? What are the motivations for all the parties to reach •an agreement ? An important motivation To tell the truth, all the leaders have a motivation and desperate needs for success. Like they say, Olmert, the Israeli prime minister was humiliated in Lebanon in 2006 and he faces a multiple corruption, investigations and he has to deal with a fragile coalition could splinter or collapse.M.Abbas the Palestine President faces a problem with Hamas who controlled Gaza and Israel who controlled the west Bank. He has only Ramallah and Nablus in the daytime .
The Failed Peace Process in the Middle East 1993-2010
Since 1977, the Israeli society is split over the question of peace versus land. The aim of this paper is to outline some of the developments that took place since the signing of the Oslo Accords in September 1993. It is argued that the peace framework agreement was like a Swiss cheese with one difference: the holes were so big as to question the essence of the cheese. I analyze the major mistakes that were made along the way by Israeli leaders. I also analyze Arafat's conduct, arguing that brinkmanship policy is very dangerous when one or both sides are willing to pay a high price with blood. The danger of escalating the situation into a comprehensive regional war is very much alive and real. It is argued that the way to escape the deadlock is to rely on the Clinton parameters and the Geneva Accord. Both documents lay the foundations for resolving all issues of contention.
Keys for Peace in the Middle East: Interview with Ambassador Itamar Rabinovich
Israel Affairs , 2019
This article records my interview with Professor Ambassador Itamar Rabinovich. We discussed the keys for successful peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians; the differences between Camp David 1978 and Camp David 2000; The Oslo Accords; the role of the United States as a mediator and the potential of other countries to become mediators; the viability of a two-state solution; peace with Syria; Taba; Annapolis; the Israeli evacuation of Gaza, and the rise of Hamas. The interview assesses the positive and negative lessons and implications of the peace process, and the likelihood of bringing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to a close.