Archaeology and Tourism: a Synergy Between Uzbekistan and Italy Archaeological Maps As Opportunities For Local Development (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Dozen Years of Central Asia: an archaeologist’s blog. Kulturní studia 18:1 (2022). 57-80.
Kulturní studia , 2022
The paper provides, in a series of anecdotal observations and accounts, an impression of the main political and cultural conditions under which archaeology is being conducted in Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan) in the early years of the 21st century. The author uses almost exclusively the experience of his own work in the region since 2009. The observations made over the best part of a dozen years suggest an amalgam of factors influencing the work of archaeologists there, ranging from post-Soviet national and ethnic ideologies voluntarily adopted by some native practitioners, to quite open and complete control and even suppression by the authorities in parts of the region. The status and behaviour of foreign archaeologists is often ambiguous, with a degree of compliance with 'local conditions' usually required in order to do any work at all. The attraction of the tremendously rich archaeology of Central Asia, as well as hopes of contributing to changes for the better, often appear to outweigh individual concerns about collaboration with the local powers that be.
Archaeological Sites, Cultural Heritage, and Sustainable Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan
Intech, 2019
This paper addresses the problem of protecting and preserving archaeological sites from the Bronze Age through the Medieval Period (ca. 2500 BC-1500 CE) as part of sustainable development that includes such economic and social benefits as (1) promoting national status; (2) integrating archaeological sites into the Silk Route narrative; (3) developing tourism related to historic and cultural heritage; and (4) creating a citizenry that values its cultural and historic resources in the face of rapid economic development and changing natural and cultural landscapes. Two UNESCO World Heritage sites will be discussed briefly: Otrar and the surrounding oasis, a medieval complex of sites along the Great Silk Route, and Tamgaly, a petroglyph and archaeological reserve. These two UNESCO World Heritage archaeological sites or preserves will be contrasted with the Talgar Iron Age sites (400 BC-100 CE) situated in a rapidly changing landscape due to economic development and infrastructure (pipelines, railways, roads, and housing) about 12-15 km east of the major city of Almaty. The goal of this article is to discuss the complexity of the entangled sectors of cultural and historic preservation, economic development, tourism, and global transnational heritage within the framework of sustainability.
Development And Future Of Archaeology Independet Kazakstan
2021
With the ancient Altai and Ural regions, Zhetysu, Jaxartes, and Balkhash basin and Mankyshlak and Saryarka valleys it features, Kazakhstan’s geography is among the earliest that has been shaping the Turkish since the archaic period. In these regions, there exist numerous substantial archeological monuments, kurgans, rock carvings (petroglyphs) and urban remains of Eurasia’s Turkish archeological heritage from the Stone, Bronze and Iron Ages and the Early Medieval Age. Throughout Kazakhstan’s deep-rooted and multifaceted past, the Scythian, Hsienpi, Kangly, Wusun, Hsiongnu, Kokturk, Turgish, Karluk, Kimek, Oghuz, Seljuk, Kipchak and Golden Horde states ruled in its lands. Five archeological remains are present in UNESCO’s World Heritage List of cultural and natural historic sites. To date, the total number of heritages that are critical in terms of history and culture is 219. The list of region’s significant historic and cultural statues contains 11.273 archeological remains. The ninth-largest geography of the globe, Kazakhstan offers a unique and multicultural scope to the researchers in archeological and historical studies. This study shall examine the archeological researches and finds’ contribution to General Turkish History. In this context, we will be examining the studies carried out during the Tsarist Period (1850-1917), USSR Period (1925-1991), and the Independent Kazakhstan Period (1991-2018) and their approaches to the archeological finds in Kazakhstan
New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2019
The aim of this study is to review some problems of formation of the tourism industry at the Kazakh sectors of the Silk Routes. The study conducted a literature review method. The conclusion has appeared that among the most promising projects of the XXI century the international program for the revival of the Silk Road on the right holds a special place in its historical and universal scale. Mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi, in the city of Turkestan, and Tamgaly petroglyphs (Almaty region) are included in the list of World Cultural Heritage by UNESCO. This is a clear proof that our ancestors left a rich heritage and recognised worldwide. We have a unique of its kind, the only post-Soviet state program 'Cultural Heritage' in the country. Thanks to her, we have restored dozens of landmarks. Kazakhstan is rich in historical monuments of the country and some objects of archeology are a thousand year old. Not surprisingly, we go to the historians from many countries.
Studia Hercynia 26/2, 2022
Tepa sites have often been the focus of archaeological investigations in the lowland areas of Soviet and post-Soviet Central Asia. This bias frequently led to paying only a little attention to the surrounding landscape and its potential for the study of historical settlement and land use. Moreover, in these environs archaeologists face particularly unfavourable conditions in the landscape, which has been radically transformed by decades of mechanised agriculture and settlement growth. The newly launched project of the Czech-Uzbekistani Archaeological Mission aims to answer the challenges of research in the heavily exploited lowlands of southern Uzbekistan and explore the surroundings, supposedly an economic territory, of Khaytabad Tepa, a walled settlement occupied between the Achaemenid period and the Middle Ages. For the investigation of various parts of a culturally and physically diverse landscape (village areas, fields, tepa mounds), a flexible methodology was developed, building on an intensive surface survey as the dominant research component to analyse the Khaytabad Tepa surroundings. Given the initial stage of the research, this report focuses on the background, objectives, and methodology of the project and evaluates the 2021 pilot season. The amount and chronological range of collected material point to the great potential of the adopted approach as well as the research area itself. The identified artefact scatters indicate a substantially more complex settlement development than has been acknowledged so far: The collected pottery assemblages largely correspond to the occupation timespan of the central walled settlement. The widespread distribution of Iron Age and Middle Ages material suggests an extensive exploitation of the area in these particular periods.